Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Reproductive Sovereignty or Bust!

A radical feminist group’s goal is reproductive sovereignty.

Sovereignty means being independent or autonomous.  A nation is sovereign when it has its own set of laws that it can enforce within its boundaries without interference.  A woman is sovereign when she can decide her own destiny without State interference.

The Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 did not give women reproductive sovereignty; it gave us the right to an abortion, but States can regulate if, how and when we get abortion.  For example, some State legislatures require minors to get parental consent, and now some States are closing down abortion clinics through oppressive regulations.

I’d like to propose that women revive the meetings with other women to share vaginal self-examination to build a movement that could actually seize the means to gain sovereignty for themselves, and to change the power relationship between all women and the State?

Unless a substantial number of us learn how to reliably and safely prevent or terminate pregnancy ourselves, reproductive rights activists’ strategies will be limited to demanding, begging, petitioning, voting, and/or, lobbying, suing, or rabble-rousing whenever the political climate changes worsens.

It is feasible for many of us to become more in charge of our own health position.  Women’s health activists discovered in the 1970s how to control our fertility with safe, effective contraception and how to abort early pregnancies safely with herbal abortafascients or with simple equipment in a group of minimally-trained women.  Additionally, we trained ourselves as midwives to assist women having safe and natural home birth.  Many U.S. women established on-going self-help clinics, women-controlled abortion and birth control and well-woman clinics and midwifery services.  Self-Helpers learned artificial insemination.  We shared home remedies to treat common vaginal infections.  We fitted each other with barrier method devices, such as diaphragms and cervical caps; we observed the changes in our cervix to enable us to avoid exposure to sperm during the times we were likely to be fertile, greatly enhancing the reliability of the fertility awareness method.  We learned we could detect conditions to alert us to seek diagnosis and treatment from medically trained personnel.

Yes, gaining sovereignty necessitated us doing more than reading books and attending sex education classes (as valuable as books and classes are).  Women researched existing medical literature and made the basic information available to all.  In self-examination groups and in running women-controlled clinics, we learned about most of women’s gynecological and obstetrical needs.  Today, when this knowledge is shared with small groups by peer facilitators, large numbers of women could learn how to incorporate it into their own health care.  In these peer-conducted groups, women would learn directly by actually seeing other women’s cervixes, thus learning what our bodies look like and how they function.

Unless there are many wider and deeper changes in our society, peer women’s health education would not be the choice of the majority.  Due to religious or other personal beliefs or convenience, they will rely on a medically certified person for health education and routine health care.  Politically, that’s not a big problem.  In order to effectively fight oppressive legislation, it would not be necessary to have all, or even a majority of women, adopt women-controlled health care.

A robust network of women’s health centers throughout the nation, staffed by women trained through self-help, would make it possible for any woman to use safer methods of birth control, or terminate an early pregnancy without having to go to a clinic.  And when a significant number of women have access to this body of knowledge and use it, the State would be deterred from arbitrarily depriving women of access to health care.  There would be general outrage, and the State would know that large numbers of women could defy it successfully.

It’s a tall order to spread this knowledge.  But, so is any other approach.  We’ll have to raise millions to help sisters travel to get abortions.  We can distribute drugs by mail to cause early abortion, but this has its legal and physical dangers also, and the State can cut off our supply.  Dramatic protests draws attention to injustice, but they will at best just spark wider protests; we’ll have to bring out massive turnouts of women again and again.

We see our reproductive rights shrinking.  The Courts are not supporting us, and the State legislatures are gutting our reproductive rights, so isn’t this a good time to start playing a new game?

The good news is that the number of women who choose to have a natural birth at home is increasing, as are midwives.  We still have feminist health centers which provide abortion and well-woman care.  There is a burgeoning movement of alternative health providers, such as breast-feeding consultants, fertility-awareness teachers, full spectrum doulas.  These providers are making women-controlled health care a reality.  We need to build on these solid gains made by feminists over the last 40 years.

Would the State attack women learning to take charge of our health care?  Probably.  We will need to support midwives and alternative providers when that happens.  However, isn’t it time to stop putting all of our radical feminist energies into political agitation to fight for access to medical services that can be regulated away.  Isn’t it time to exert our collective efforts to independently provide those services to ourselves?

Carol Downer introduced the concept of vaginal self-examination in 1971 and co-founded the Feminist Women’s Health Center in 1972.  She is the editor and/or co-author of several books, including A New View of a Woman’s Body.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
Victor Grossman
A Big Rally and a Bavarian Vote
James Bovard
Groped at the Airport: Congress Must End TSA’s Sexual Assaults on Women
Jeff Roby
Florida After Hurricane Michael: the Sad State of the Unheeded Planner
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Bradley Kaye
The Policy of Policing
Wim Laven
The Catholic Church Fails Sexual Abuse Victims
Kevin Cashman
One Year After Hurricane Maria: Employment in Puerto Rico is Down by 26,000
Dr. Hakim Young
Nonviolent Afghans Bring a Breath of Fresh Air
Karl Grossman
Irving Like vs. Big Nuke
Dan Corjescu
The New Politics of Climate Change
John Carter
The Plight of the Pyrenees: the Abandoned Guard Dogs of the West
Ted Rall
Brett Kavanaugh and the Politics of Emotion-Shaming
Graham Peebles
Sharing is Key to a New Economic and Democratic Order
Ed Rampell
The Advocates
Louis Proyect
The Education Business
David Yearsley
Shock-and-Awe Inside Oracle Arena
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail