Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal

If you are able to donate $100 or more for our Annual Fund Drive, your donation will be matched by another generous CounterPuncher! These are tough times. Regardless of the political rhetoric bantered about the airwaves, the recession hasn’t ended for most of us. We know that money is tight for many of you. But we also know that tens of thousands of daily readers of CounterPunch depend on us to slice through the smokescreen and tell it like is. Please, donate if you can!


The Power Behind the Pipeline


The “Dakota Access” Pipeline (DAPL) is a $3.8 billion, 1,100 mile fracked-oil pipeline that is currently under construction running from the Bakken shale fields of North Dakota to Peoria, Illinois. DAPL is slated to cross Lakota Treaty Territory at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation where it would be laid underneath the Missouri River, the longest river on the continent.

Construction of the DAPL would impact many sites that are sacred to the Standing Rock Sioux and numerous other indigenous nations. DAPL would also, engender a renewed fracking-frenzy in the Bakken shale region, as well as endanger a source of fresh water for the Standing Rock Sioux and 8 million people living downstream.

This massive infrastructure project is being built and financed by a complex network of dozens of shady oil companies and banks with presences all over the world. Research into the pipeline’s ownership shows us that virtually every major bank in the world is financially connected to the companies involved in the project and numerous oil and gas companies will have ownership interests in the project. But who is driving the construction of the pipeline, and more importantly who has the power to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline?

The Ownership Interest

The Dakota Access Pipeline project is owned by a convoluted network of oil and pipeline companies, joint ventures, and holding companies. Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners and its wholly-owned subsidiary Sunoco Logistics (ETP/SLX) currently own 38.25% of the pipeline; MarEn Bakken Company LLC, a joint venture between Enbridge Energy Partners and Marathon Petroleum Company owns 36.75% of the pipeline (ultimately Enbridge and Marathon hold 27.6% and 9.1% ownership interests in the pipeline); and a subsidiary of Phillips 66 owns the remaining 25% of the project.

Energy Transfer Partners is overseeing the construction of the pipeline and if the Dakota Access Pipeline were to be completed completed Sunoco Logistics would take over as the operator of the pipeline.

As the company with, by far, the largest ownership interest and the company overseeing the construction and the theoretical operation of the pipeline Energy Transfer Partners is clearly responsible for driving this destructive project and the player in the best position to bring it to a halt.

Energy Transfer Partners is itself a complicated company. It’s actually three different companies–Energy Transfer Partners, Energy Transfer Equity, and Sunoco Logistics–that are controlled by a single general partnership company. While it is publicly traded it is relatively tightly held and controlled by a small group of key investors led by the flamboyant billionaire Kelcy Warren. In addition to his love of making money and destroying the earth Warren also owns a record label, Music Road Records, and he fancies himself as a major philanthropist. He’s a regular at the major gala dinners around his hometown of Dallas, TX and he even paid $10 million to name a park in downtown Dallas after his son Klyde.

The Money Behind the Pipeline

The oil companies behind the pipeline are rich, but they aren’t rich enough to shell out the $3.8 billion needed to build the pipeline on their own. While each of the companies involved holds lines of credit with numerous banks and financial institutions, the money that is ear marked specifically for the project is a $2.5 billion project finance loan.

The loan, which closed on August 2, 2016 was coordinated by Citibank along with the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Mizuho Bank and TD Securities. The interesting piece of this loan is that under the credit agreement the borrowers could only access $1.1 billion immediately. The other $1.4 billion would not become available until the pipeline received the appropriate permits.

As of the closing of the loan agreement $860.7 million of that original $1.1 billion had already been borrowed. If Citibank, the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Mizuho Bank and TD Securities were to hold back remaining $1.4 billion the cash for the pipeline could dry up and the project could come grinding to a potentially permanent halt.

Protected by an Army for Hire

One additional company in this web of corporate greed deserves a dishonorable mention. G4S, a UK-based security multinational is providing armed mercenaries to harass and brutalize defenders of the water in North Dakota. This isn’t G4S’ first foray into human rights abuses. The company is the target of a years-long global campaign for its role in profiting from the inhumane treatment of Palestinians in Israeli prisons and the torture of children.

Water protectors in the Red Warrior Camp and the Camp of the Sacred Stone have been subjected to chemical weapons, arrest, dog attacks and other mistreatment at the hands of private security guards and law enforcement. While removing G4S from their posts in North Dakota would do little to slow the destruction, shining a spotlight on these goons could help to keep them in check and help to keep the water defenders safer.

Taking Action to Cut Off the Power Behind the Pipeline

As Utah Phillips once famously said, “the earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.” With virtually every single major bank in the world and a gaggle of oil and gas companies standing to rake in huge profits off this destructive and irresponsible project there are simply too many names to name and addresses to list. But we do know where the power behind the pipeline is.

Of the four banks most involved in underwriting the project finance agreement—and the four banks that have the authority to yank the second half of the loan out from under this project—two have a major presence in North America: Citibank and TD Bank. Their customers need to know what these banks are up to and their executives need to know that we’ll disrupt business as usual until they stop the pipeline.

Energy Transfer Partners, the main driver behind the construction of the pipeline, is unlikely recognize the error in its ways and stop this reckless project. But until funding is pulled ETP and its flamboyant CEO, Kelcy Warren, needs to be isolated and marginalized. He shouldn’t be able to host concerts with his record label, Music Road Records; attend charity galas, or plaster his family’s name on buildings and public parks without being confronted for his central role in the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Hundreds of institutions and individuals are involved in financing, permitting, and building the Dakota Access Pipeline and they are each culpable in the destruction of sites that are sacred to the Standing Rock Sioux and numerous other indigenous nations. But Citibank, TD Bank and Kelcy Warren have the power to stop the pipeline and they are within our movements’ reach. Water protectors are taking bold and inspiring action in North Dakota and Iowa to put their bodies on the line to stop the pipeline; NGO’s and lawyers are battling the permits and approvals in courts and the halls of Congress. But we can continue to extend this fight across the continent and around the world by cutting off the power behind the pipeline.

Tapping into the New Currency: Direct Action

In early September, the Red Warrior Camp in partnership with the Camp of the Sacred Stones issued a call to action that stated: “Water is a necessity for all life. Water is life. Now is the time for all people from all walks of life to join together to stop the desecration and destruction of water, land and life!”

Around the globe, tapping into a “currency of moods” through these weeks of action, we saw disruptions at corporate events, vigils, protests, civil disobediences and constant digital and media communications. Rising Tide North America, the FANG collective and many other groups organized an effort that saw over one hundred actions and events in this two week period.

*In Dallas, TX, at the headquarters of Energy Transfer Partners in a bold night time action,“Anti-colonialists Against Billionaires” locked the building’s parking garage doors shut with U-locks and left a banner saying “Kelcey Warren is an Asshole. Solidarity with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. No DAPL”
In Philadelphia, the city’s #NoDAPL Solidarity organizers put together a “tour of shame” that marched hundreds through the streets and shut down at least five TD Securities branches with non-violent direct action.

*In Vermont, over fifty people occupied a Michels construction site building another pipeline locally.

*In Pittsburgh, more than one hundred people shut down Liberty Avenue, a major thoroughfare, in front of the offices of the Army Corps of Engineers during a busy afternoon rush hour.

*Dozens of actions targeting banks from New Orleans to Chicago to San Francisco to Tucson to Washington D.C. sent a clear message to the financiers of the pipeline that “if you fund it, we will find you.” Dozens more held solidarity vigils and gatherings, fundraisers and supply drives.

Solidarity with the fight against the Dakota Access Pipeline to a larger and larger scale was an important goal in September. People regularly put their bodies on the line in North Dakota to stop the pipeline, the call to action was for allies with privilege to do the same.

Lessons Moving Forward

Important ongoing lessons moving forward in the fight against the Dakota Access Pipeline and other fossil fuel infrastructure projects include:

*Fight in solidarity with Indigenous communities and other frontline communities. As stated above, the September actions were a call for allies to take action and escalate in support of Indigenous rights and stopping the Dakota Access Pipeline. The oil and coal barons of the world seek to exploit land and people. They regularly use race and class to divide and further their interests. Allies must take action and fight in solidarity with Indigenous and other frontline communities.

*Revoke the social and political license of carbon intensive industries to operate in the political economy. Oil companies own the U.S. political system and are major players in every part of the economy. Furthermore, the inevitability of the fossil fuel industry is a too accepted part our culture. That narrative must change. Aggressive campaigns targeting companies, CEOs, pro-industry pundits and thought-leaders is the key.

*Make militant direct action the organizing strategy, not just a tool in the toolbox. Big Green groups describe non-violent direct action as just one “tool in a toolbox.” Movements around the world use confrontational action as a strategy, not just as a tactic. Militant movements in Serbia ousted Milosevic, in Bolivia booted out Bechtel, and in Seattle shut down the World Trade Organization (WTO) and sent it into a tailspin. Militant direct action is a strategy we use to build real movements, change power dynamics, shift societies and even remove governments. Fighting oil companies, banks and pipelines, it creates a crisis in the business model.

*The Democratic Party is not our friend. Despite green groups like the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Center praising President Obama as a “climate hero” and framing their strategies in 2016 around preserving his “climate legacy,” the industry friendly policies on both the Dakota Access Pipeline and numerous other fossil fuel infrastructure projects remain decidedly unfriendly to the climate and communities impacted by them. Obama’s “All Of The Above” energy policy coupled with the FBI surveilling organizers, but refusing to investigate private security firms run amok are a long existing systemic pro-energy industry bias within his administration. The Democrats are not our friends. Whether it is the Obama Administration or the upcoming Clinton Administration.

*Fight capitalism and corporate power. A systemic critique of the existing economic system is required to delegitimize fossil fuels. This movement has its roots in anti-globalization, anti-austerity and Occupy movements. Portion of it have incorporated this critique into a vision for a better world. “Like corporate globalization, climate and related ecological crisis affects everyone, everywhere, so gives us an amazing opportunity to organize across the many things that keep us divided and ruled” reflects veteran street organizer David Solnit. “The challenge is to define the climate crisis deeply in a way that understands that it is rooted in an economic and political system that is hardwired to be anti-democratic and exploit the earth and people for profit.”

October 18, 2017
Patrick Cockburn
Seizing Kirkuk
John Wight
Weinstein as Symptom: Notes From Hollywood
Matthew Hoh
Bowe Bergdahl: Traitor to American Exceptionalism and White Supremacy
Chris Ernesto
Funding for War vs. Natural Disasters
Aidan O'Brien
Where’s Duterte From and Where’s He Going To?
Jon Bailes
Mental Health and Neoliberalism: an Interview with William Davies
Ramzy Baroud
The Real Reason Behind Trump’s Angry Diplomacy in North Korea
Paul Craig Roberts
Washington, Not China, is the Biggest Threat to American Power
Mike Davis
El Diablo in Wine Country
Binoy Kampmark
Trump’s Iran Deal
Lara Merling
Remember Puerto Rico Needs Fair Medicaid Funding Too
Phil Rockstroh
2 or 3 Things I Know About Capitalism
Eoghan O’Suilleabhain
Rambo Wept: Our Commandos Good, Your Terrorists Bad
Dimitris Bellantis
On Catalonia: Debates in the Greek Left
Robert Koehler
The Calm Before the Storm
Mike Hastie
Napalm Sticks to Kids
October 17, 2017
Suzanne Gordon – Ian Hoffmann
Trumpcare for Veterans? VA Outsourcing Will Create Healthcare Industry Bonanza
Patrick Cockburn
The Real Destabilizer in the Middle East is Not Iran But Trump
Jonathan Cook
The Real Reasons Trump is Quitting UNESCO
Murtaza Shibli
My Friend From ISIS in Raqqa
Kathy Kelly
Wrongful Rhetoric and Trump’s Strategy on Iran
David Bonner
Beyond Taking a Knee: Duane Thomas, Where are You When We Need You?
Tom Gill
Austerity, Macron-Style
Liaquat Ali Khan
Pakistan Faces a Life-Threatening Military Coup
Jeff Mackler
Is Trump a ‘Moron?’
Amena Elashkar
If You Work for Justice in Palestine, Why Won’t You Let Palestinians Speak?
John Feffer
Trump’s Unprecedented Right-Turn on Foreign Policy
Ariel Dorfman
Trump’s War on the Mind
Dean Baker
The Republican Tax Plan to Slow Growth
Gerry Brown
The Return of One-Man Rule in China?
Binoy Kampmark
Climate Change Insurgent: Tony Abbott’s Crusade
Kent Paterson
Assassination in Guerrero: the Murder of Ranferi Hernandez Acevedo
Rob Okun
Men and Sexual Assault in the Age of Trump
October 16, 2017
Vijay Prashad
A Tale of Two Islands
Ben Dangl
Profiting from America’s Longest War: Trump Seeks to Exploit Mineral Wealth of Afghanistan
Jan Oberg
Trump is Moving Toward War With Iran
Thomas S. Harrington
The Baseless Myth of the Poor, Propagandized Catalans
Steve Brown
When a Radio Host Interviews a War Criminal, Is It Churlish to Ask About His War Crimes?
Howard Lisnoff
Capturing the Flag
Patrick Cockburn
ISIS is Facing Near Total Defeat, But It Has Been Beaten and Come Back Before
Julian Vigo
The Fall of Harvey Weinstein and the Sexual Blindspot of Misogyny
James Munson
The Rich Can’t Achieve Plurality, But the Poor Can
Amitai Ben-Abba
The NIMPE Critique of Antifa
Robert Fisk
We Will Soon See What the Word “Unity” Means for the Palestinian People
Alice Donovan
Civil War in Venezuela: a US Joint Operation with Colombia?