FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Bernie Sanders and the Dance of the Seven Veils

When we infuse Faith, Hope and Charity into political analysis it mutates into the willful blindness of “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.” So it should be no surprise that die-hard Sanders supporters still cling to Bernie’s studied ambiguity as a sign that he’s planning some kind of Hail Mary pass.

Over the months, the Sandernistas have generally insisted that their loyal support for Bernie is not at all like the Obamamania that put Bonnie Prince Barry on the Oval Office throne in 2008. Because Bernie Sanders is an altogether different kind of person and politician, which is sort of true, then, “This time it’s different.”

Perhaps unconsciously, they attribute the same Political Ninja Master qualities and motivations to this decidedly “different” candidate. They are convinced that Bernie’s coy reluctance to unambiguously declare his support for Clinton must be a signal that he’s “up to something” that will result in pulling victory from the jaws of defeat in this strange electoral Dance Of the Seven Veils.

He’s dead, but he won’t lie down. So he must have something up his sleeve! And indeed he does. Unfortunately, since the California primary, Sanders has been rhetorically rolling up his sleeves and revealing “I ♥ Hillary & the Democratic Party” tattoos.

For better or worse, it appears that Team Sanders chose to employ the term ‘revolution’ as a sanitized marketing buzzword to give the campaign a certain pizzazz– especially to attract and capture the youth vote. Tragically, to some extent it worked and now they are stuck with it. So Bernie is compelled to characterize his oft-stated intention to gracefully admit defeat and support the Democratic Party and its pre-chosen nominee, as just another front in the “revolutionary” Long Game.

Although he will essentially be campaigning for what he seemingly campaigned against, Sanders and his spokespersons and allies will shamefully deny the contradiction — or hypocrisy — and instead try to have it both ways. Because pragmatism in politics is the art of compromise. “Realistically” it is, “Anybody But Trump.” Priorities, people! Cognitive dissonance be damned.

Team Sanders must deflect and downplay the unfortunate “Judas goat” aspect of his soft challenge to the Democratic Establishment and seek to persuade his followers that this capitulation is at worst a disagreeable but necessary turn of events. It’s tricky because he can’t openly characterize supporting Clinton as “taking a step backwards to move two steps forward.” Unlike the progressive-liberal punditocracy, Sanders can’t validate his supporters’ profound disappointment, skepticism and loathing of Hillary by urging them to “hold their noses” and vote the Democratic ticket.

Instead, as Sanders slowly lets the proverbial cat out of the bag, his devoted supporters seem determined to misinterpret what they’re seeing. Nevertheless, he will eventually have to express an “authentic” personal enthusiasm for a Clinton administration — one that can’t be dismissed as mere gentlemanly courtesy or good sportsmanship.

At present, the Sanders campaign is launching its principled capitulation with a familiar fusillade of Exciting, Optimistic Big Ideas for stepping up the Bernie-inspired “movement” to challenge the corrupt and decadent duopoly. He is rallying lots of urgent grassroots activism to support more and better progressive politicians. Thus far this translates into ‘progressive’ Democrats. No third party “spoilers” need apply.

My guess is they will continue the generic reassurances that the “revolution” is only beginning. It will be interesting to see if — and how many — Sanders supporters will buy into the hype that the “revolution” is as alive as ever; it’s just prudently going underground the way Occupy did.

But how can Bernie possibly escape the corner he has systematically painted himself into? How can he distance himself from a year of gallantly treating Hillary Clinton as a worthy opponent, even as Democratic Party dirty tricks consistently victimized his own supporters? How can he walk back his insistence that the Democratic Party is the only viable path to political salvation, ripe for “revolutionary” reform, if only he can nail a few ‘progressive’ planks into the Party platform?

It’s bad enough that the corporate/mainstream mass-media commentariat, not to mention the Clinton campaign, would have a field day characterizing any major course changes as a “flip-flop” or the desperate flailing of a “sore loser”. But it could be even worse for Bernie if his opponents and detractors pile on to discredit him as he becomes a pariah among his congressional colleagues.

The more salient question is how will Bernie supporters react if he suddenly “rises to the occasion” in a way he has publicly refused to do from the very beginning of his campaign. Those who are still “Feeling the Bern” may rejoice at any indication that Bernie may not go gentle into that good night. But Sanders supporters capable of critical thinking will have to reconcile any drastic changes to the campaign with what has gone before.

They will have to accept that a “New Sanders” is as ostensibly honest and authentic as the original version. At least the younger ones won’t remember the dubious precedent of the “New Nixon.”

In any case, it should be obvious by now that this is not who Sanders *is*. He is either unwilling to lead or is incapable of leading a “revolution” — even a revolution that is limited to breaking out of the established electoral farce. He’s not going to do it — not now, during or after the convention.

Remember. This is the candidate who told Hillary Clinton he was “sick and tired” of hearing about her damn emails.

But by all means people, please, please give ‘em hell in the streets!!

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
November 14, 2019
Laura Carlsen
Mexico’s LeBaron Massacre and the War That Will Not Cease
Joe Emersberger
Oppose the Military Coup in Bolivia. Spare Us Your “Critiques”
Ron Jacobs
Trump’s Drug Deal Goes to Congress: Impeachment, Day One
Paul Edwards
Peak Hubris
Tamara Pearson
US and Corporations Key Factors Behind Most Violent Year Yet in Mexico
Jonah Raskin
Love and Death in the Age of Revolution
Robert Hunziker
Climate Confusion, Angst, and Sleeplessness
W. T. Whitney
To Confront Climate Change Humanity Needs Socialism
John Feffer
Examining Trump World’s Fantastic Claims About Ukraine
Nicky Reid
“What About the Children?” Youth Rights Before Parental Police States
Binoy Kampmark
Incinerating Logic: Bush Fires and Climate Change
John Horning
The Joshua Tree is Us
Andrew Stewart
Noel Ignatiev and the Great Divide
Cesar Chelala
Soap Operas as Teaching Tools
Chelli Stanley
In O’odham Land
November 13, 2019
Vijay Prashad
After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia
Charles Pierson
How Not to End a Forever War
Kenneth Surin
“We’ll See You on the Barricades”: Bojo Johnson’s Poundshop Churchill Imitation
Nick Alexandrov
Murder Like It’s 1495: U.S.-Backed Counterinsurgency in the Philippines
George Ochenski
Montana’s Radioactive Waste Legacy
Brian Terrell
A Doubtful Proposition: a Reflection on the Trial of the Kings Bay Plowshares 7
Nick Pemberton
Assange, Zuckerberg and Free Speech
James Bovard
The “Officer Friendly” Police Fantasy
Dean Baker
The Logic of Medical Co-Payments
Jeff Mackler
Chicago Teachers Divided Over Strike Settlement
Binoy Kampmark
The ISC Report: Russian Connections in Albion?
Norman Solomon
Biden and Bloomberg Want Uncle Sam to Defer to Uncle Scrooge
Jesse Jackson
Risking Lives in Endless Wars is Morally Wrong and a Strategic Failure
Manuel García, Jr.
Criminalated Warmongers
November 12, 2019
Nino Pagliccia
Bolivia and Venezuela: Two Countries, But Same Hybrid War
Patrick Cockburn
How Iran-Backed Forces Are Taking Over Iraq
Jonathan Cook
Israel is Silencing the Last Voices Trying to Stop Abuses Against Palestinians
Jim Kavanagh
Trump’s Syrian See-Saw: From Pullout to Pillage
Susan Babbitt
Fidel, Three Years Later
Dean Baker
A Bold Plan to Strengthen and Improve Social Security is What America Needs
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Trump’s Crime Against Humanity
Victor Grossman
The Wall and General Pyrrhus
Yoko Liriano
De Facto Martial Law in the Philippines
Ana Paula Vargas – Vijay Prashad
Lula is Free: Can Socialism Be Restored?
Thomas Knapp
Explainer: No, House Democrats Aren’t Violating Trump’s Rights
Wim Laven
Serve With Honor, Honor Those Who Serve; or Support Trump?
Colin Todhunter
Agrarian Crisis and Malnutrition: GM Agriculture Is Not the Answer
Binoy Kampmark
Walls in the Head: “Ostalgia” and the Berlin Wall Three Decades Later
Akio Tanaka
Response to Pete Dolack Articles on WBAI and Pacifica
Nyla Ali Khan
Bigotry and Ideology in India and Kashmir: the Legacy of the Babri Masjid Mosque
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail