FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

How Donald Trump Successfully Wagged the Dog, and More

Although I have never seen Donald Trump with a pet, I do believe that he wagged the dog when he ordered the assassination of the Iranian General Qasem Soleimani. The expression “wag the dog” comes from a 1997 film satire in which a president, caught up in a sex scandal, uses a war to divert attention from his peccadillo. It was released at about the time of the Monica Lewinsky/ President Clinton scandal and later U.S. bombing in Sudan. In Trump’s case, he more than wagged the dog. By ratcheting up tensions with Iran, he also increased his stature as commander-in-chief to the detriment of Democratic candidates and reinforced his image as a rogue head of state.

That Donald Trump had the Iranian general killed to minimize his impeachment cannot be proven or denied. Nevertheless, U.S. government officials continue to seek justification for the killing of a foreign government official on foreign soil with all kinds of shaky explanations of why it was done to counter an imminent danger that has never been convincingly explained. No legal justification seems reasonable. In fact, a State Department spokesperson indicated that no legal justification was even necessary.

So, given that there seems no reasonable legal justification, the wag the dog theory has possibilities.

But beyond the wag the dog theory, there is also the question of what it means for Trump’s Democratic opponents. Can you see Elizabeth Warren as commander-in-chief? Or Bernie Sanders? Neither Warren nor Sanders gains by the projection of Trump as a decisive military leader in case the conflict with Iran escalates, perhaps Bernie less so as he repeatedly reminds us that he has been against wars going back to Vietnam.

And Mayor Pete? Although Buttigieg did serve in the military, the 37-year-old was an intelligence officer and armed driver. Neither of these positions indicate that he would have the necessary experience or command authority in case of a serious confrontation with the Islamic Republic.

Which leads us to Joe Biden. Although Trump and others maintain that Biden would be Trump’s most serious opponent, the former vice-president has no military background. Given that the Democratic party is usually considered soft on defense, and that Biden was an agreeing vice-president under a president who refused to assassinate Soleimani or punish Syria when the red line of using chemical weapons was crossed, for a certain electorate Trump trumps Biden as being decisive and strong.

In addition, Biden was whole heartedly in favor of the Iraq War, which he has since had to explain away, just as he has had to explain away how he ran the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination process. After announcing his candidacy in 2019, Biden reportedly called Anita Hill to “express his regrets.” Not the stuff of a decisive leader that seems to be the new normal as a Trumpian criteria.

And beyond U.S. politics, the world now looks at the United States president as a madman. The madman theory goes back to Richard Nixon’s foreign policy. While government officials use rational choice theory to anticipate the next moves of other countries’ leaders, the madman theory tries to portray a leader as irrational and volatile, giving that leader the advantage of being difficult to predict.

The media tells us that Trump was given a list of Iranian scenarios to choose from. The assassination, we are told, was the most radical. Some even said that the planners hesitated to give it to Trump because they thought he would never accept it. In other words, for the people within the government, assassinating Soleimani was not a reasonable choice. Hence, the order to go ahead with the assassination plays into portraying Trump as impulsive, which is meant to throw off other countries’ calculations of what he will do.

The descriptions of the behind-the-scene of Trump’s order to kill is intended to put all rational formula on hold. The madman theory fits perfectly into all we are being given as information about Trump’s decision-making process.

(Perhaps Soleimani’s death will also lead people to re-examine the decision-making process by which U.S. presidents order assassinations. And this not just as far as Executive vs. Congressional authority is concerned as well as the War Powers Act. What criteria did Barack Obama use when he fingered people to be killed by U.S. agents? The major difference here is that Trump ordered a government official to be killed while Obama, we are told, was targeting mere civilians.)

The movie “Wag the Dog” was a satire. But just as the virtual has become real and the normal has become the new normal, Donald Trump has taken the political beyond film and satire. And he doesn’t even need a pet to wag the dog.

More articles by:

Daniel Warner is the author of An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations. (Lynne Rienner). He lives in Geneva.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
February 24, 2020
Stephen Corry
New Deal for Nature: Paying the Emperor to Fence the Wind
M. K. Bhadrakumar
How India’s Modi is Playing on Trump’s Ego to His Advantage
Jennifer Matsui
Tycoon Battle-Bots Battle Bernie
Robert Fisk
There’s Little Chance for Change in Lebanon, Except for More Suffering
Rob Wallace
Connecting the Coronavirus to Agriculture
Bill Spence
Burning the Future: the Growing Anger of Young Australians
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Binoy Kampmark
The Priorities of General Motors: Ditching Holden
George Wuerthner
Trojan Horse Timber Sales on the Bitterroot
Rick Meis
Public Lands “Collaboration” is Lousy Management
David Swanson
Bloomberg Has Spent Enough to Give a Nickel to Every Person Whose Life He’s Ever Damaged
Peter Cohen
What Tomorrow May Bring: Politics of the People
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon?
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
Jefferson Morley
On JFK, Tulsi Gabbard Keeps Very Respectable Company
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up for Left Literature: In India, It Can Cost You Your Life
Gary Leupp
Bloomberg Versus Bernie: The Upcoming Battle?
Ron Jacobs
The Young Lords: Luchadores Para La Gente
Richard Klin
Loss Leaders
Gaither Stewart
Roma: How Romans Differ From Europeans
Kerron Ó Luain
The Soviet Century
Mike Garrity
We Can Fireproof Homes But Not Forests
Fred Baumgarten
Gaslighting Bernie and His Supporters
Joseph Essertier
Our First Amendment or Our Empire, But Not Both
Peter Linebaugh
A Story for the Anthropocene
Danny Sjursen
Where Have You Gone Smedley Butler?
Jill Richardson
A Broken Promise to Teachers and Nonprofit Workers
Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission for Julian Assange
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail