FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Forget About Human Rights

The Donald J. Trump’s indifference to human rights, law, and basic morality was on display again in December 2019. For example, his

+ Greeting the Russian Foreign Minister in the Oval Office while Ukraine’s president never got there, another reminder of Trump’s reluctance to support Ukraine against a Russian invasion;

+ Readiness to excuse Saudi Arabia for one of its officers killing three sailors and wounding eight others;

+ Pleasure at securing a more than $700 billion defense budget while stripping food support (“SNAP”) from hundreds of thousands of needy Americans.

The president’s “ignore human rights” syndrome also extends to North Korea, where the U.S. delegation to the United Nations for a second year refused to put North Korea’s human rights on the Security Council agenda for Human Rights Day, December 10, 2019. Eight of the Council’s fifteen members signed a letter to schedule the meeting but needed a ninth signature, which the United States again refused to provide.

“Once again, the U.S. has prevented the U.N. Security Council from scrutinizing North Korea’s abysmal human rights record, apparently because of President Trump’s special relationship with Kim Jong Un,” said Louis Charbonneau, the U.N. director for Human Rights Watch. “By blocking this meeting, which was set to go ahead on Human Rights Day…the Trump administration is sending a message to Kim that the U.S. no long considers arbitrary detention, starvation, torture, summary executions, sexual violence and other crimes against the North Korean people a priority,” Charbonneau added: “North Korea and many other abusive governments can now rest assured that they have little to fear from the Trump administration when it comes to human rights.”

The South Korean government also joined the effort to buy the North’s good will by appeasement. In mid-November 2019 Seoul  withdrew from a list of more than forty co-sponsors of a General Assembly resolution condemning “the grave human rights situation” in North Korea. This was the first time since 2008, the era of South Korea’s Sunshine Policy toward North Korea, that Seoul declined to co-sponsor the resolution.

The General Assembly resolution tried to advance the 2014 report of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic (DPRK). The commission accused the DPRK of crimes against humanity, including murder, enslavement, torture, rape, forced abortions, and persecution. The inquiry found that “the gravity, scale, and nature of these violations reveal a state that does not have any parallel in the contemporary world.” The decision-making process for these abuses “is dominated by the Supreme Leader and a small group of people” in the Workers’ Party of Korea and the National Defence Commission, some of whom are “relatives of the Supreme Leader.”

In December 2014 the UN General Assembly urged the Security Council to refer these human rights accusations to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Security Council then voted to discuss DPRK human rights as an agenda item separate from nonproliferation. China and Russia voted against this decision but could not veto it, because the issue was “procedural.”

In March 2017 the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights moved to help its field office in Seoul develop a depository for evidence regarding suspected violations of international law. In 2018 the UN General Assembly again urged the Security Council to consider taking the DPRK rights abuses to the ICC. Since China, Russia, and perhaps the United States might veto the measure, however, this discussion did not take place. In 2018 and 2019 the Trump administration made sure that the DPRK abuses were not even debated on “Human Rights Day.”

While Seoul and Washington sought to secure the good will of North Korea’s Great Leader, the DPRK launched one ballistic rocket after another (thirteen since May) and tested an engine that could propel an ICBM across the Pacific. It appeared that the U.S. president would suffer the worst of two worlds—a gradual improvements in Kim Jong Un’s nuclear missile forces and no easing of Kim’s repression of human rights. There were also signs that Moscow and Beijing were developing closer ties with Pyongyang. On December 11, 2019 China’s U.N. Ambassador Zhang Jun said it was “imperative” for the UN Security Council to ease sanctions on North Korea to support talks between Pyongyang and Washington.

If all this did not disturb the U.S. president’s composure, the scorn heaped on him by NATO allies and the widening penumbra of impeachment could hardly brighten his horizon. As such pressures mounted, they were unlikely to alter his disdain for human rights.

More articles by:

Walter Clemens is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Boston University and Associate, Harvard University Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies. He wrote Complexity Science and World Affairs (SUNY Press, 2013).

Weekend Edition
July 10, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Lynnette Grey Bull
Trump’s Postcard to America From the Shrine of Hypocrisy
Anthony DiMaggio
Free Speech Fantasies: the Harper’s Letter and the Myth of American Liberalism
David Yearsley
Morricone: Maestro of Music and Image
Jeffrey St. Clair
“I Could Live With That”: How the CIA Made Afghanistan Safe for the Opium Trade
Rob Urie
Democracy and the Illusion of Choice
Paul Street
Imperial Blind Spots and a Question for Obama
Vijay Prashad
The U.S. and UK are a Wrecking Ball Crew Against the Pillars of Internationalism
Melvin Goodman
The Washington Post and Its Cold War Drums
Richard C. Gross
Trump: Reopen Schools (or Else)
Chris Krupp
Public Lands Under Widespread Attack During Pandemic 
Alda Facio
What Coronavirus Teaches Us About Inequality, Discrimination and the Importance of Caring
Eve Ottenberg
Bounty Tales
Andrew Levine
Silver Linings Ahead?
John Kendall Hawkins
FrankenBob: The Self-Made Dylan
Pam Martens - Russ Martens
Deutsche Bank Fined $150 Million for Enabling Jeffrey Epstein; Where’s the Fine Against JPMorgan Chase?
David Rosen
Inequality and the End of the American Dream
Louis Proyect
Harper’s and the Great Cancel Culture Panic
Thom Hartmann
How Billionaires Get Away With Their Big Con
REZA FIYOUZAT
Your 19th COVID Breakdown
Danny Sjursen
Undercover Patriots: Trump, Tulsa, and the Rise of Military Dissent
Charles McKelvey
The Limitations of the New Antiracist Movement
Binoy Kampmark
Netanyahu’s Annexation Drive
Joseph G. Ramsey
An Empire in Points
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
COVID-19 Denialism is Rooted in the Settler Colonial Mindset
Ramzy Baroud
On Israel’s Bizarre Definitions: The West Bank is Already Annexed
Judith Deutsch
Handling Emergency: A Tale of Two Males
Michael Welton
Getting Back to Socialist Principles: Honneth’s Recipe
Dean Baker
Combating the Political Power of the Rich: Wealth Taxes and Seattle Election Vouchers
Jonah Raskin
Edward Sanders: Poetic Pacifist Up Next
Manuel García, Jr.
Carbon Dioxide Uptake by Vegetation After Emissions Shutoff “Now”
Heidi Peltier
The Camo Economy: How Military Contracting Hides Human Costs and Increases Inequality
Ron Jacobs
Strike!, Fifty Years and Counting
Ellen Taylor
The Dark Side of Science: Shooting Barred Owls as Scapegoats for the Ravages of Big Timber
Sarah Anderson
Shrink Wall Street to Guarantee Good Jobs
Graham Peebles
Prison: Therapeutic Centers Or Academies of Crime?
Zhivko Illeieff
Can We Escape Our Addiction to Social Media?
Clark T. Scott
The Democrat’s Normal Keeps Their (Supposed) Enemies Closer and Closer
Steve Early - Suzanne Gordon
In 2020 Elections: Will Real-Life “Fighting Dems” Prove Irresistible?
David Swanson
Mommy, Where Do Peace Activists Come From?
Christopher Brauchli
Trump the Orator
Gary Leupp
Columbus and the Beginning of the American Way of Life: A Message to Indoctrinate Our Children
John Stanton
Donald J. Trump, Stone Cold Racist
Nicky Reid
The Stonewall Blues (Still Dreaming of a Queer Nation)
Stephen Cooper
A Kingston Reasoning with Legendary Guitarist Earl “Chinna” Smith (The Interview: Part 2)
Hugh Iglarsh
COVID-19’s Coming to Town
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail