Rojava, a Popular Imperial Project

Young activists are coming out in support of Kurdish independence in Syria.    They see themselves of ‘subjects’ of an inexorable empire and look for ways to accomplish some good.   Of course we elders don’t want to see ourselves as ‘subjects of empire’ but  the current youth didn’t grow up with the same illusions that those of us who were teenagers in the postwar WWII US of the fifties and sixties.    Most of us were clueless about the horrors visited on the world by our country until the Vietnam war interrupted our lives due to the draft.   Even then, we felt empowered within our own country.   Our personal lives weren’t constrained by it the way theirs are.  Today’s young people are hemmed in by empire on all sides and they don’t see any easy way out.   So, they adapt.   It they can’t be empowered against the empire, maybe they can use it to further a positive objective.   That’s the slippery slope but it’s real and understandable..

We older folks avoid the reality even when our best writers say over and over again what a brutal power our country is on the world scene.  Although the youth seem too ready to adapt (in my opinion) many of us older folks don’t even now recognize the truth of what the US is. We have been right where the youth stand today.  We supported the creation of, and growth of Israel.   We opposed  Mao’s China and the Soviet Union and didn’t much notice all the awful things the US was doing in the global south at the time.   We in the US have a very hard time letting other peoples develop at their own rate, make their own mistakes and grow in their own way from their own roots.   Our sense of our own benevolence and power lures us into the same mistakes as previous generations have made.

An  immediate problem is the concept that we need to use the power of empire in a benevolent way and support this or that movement.   As soon as we do that we cede all power to the empire and Syria is one more  case where that ideology has been used against the people of the region over and over.  The fate of the Kurds in Iraq is dismissed but they were openly attacked by the Iraqi government during the Iran/Iraq war during the 80s.   Even so, in 2009, many Kurdish young people told me they were Iraqi citizens.   They were ready to try again.   But the old leadership was not with them.

Today, the Kurds in Iraq aren’t doing so well.   They were great during the war because the war wasn’t happening there.  But, now, as a US protectorate, they are paying their dues.   Jalal Talabani, who was President of Iraq for a long time, whose party used to balance the local Kurdish government of Masoud Barzani so it looked like a democracy, is gone.   In it’s place is a ‘Change’ party that was educated on Democracy through USAID trips to European parliaments, and which claims the mantle of ‘democracy’ for itself alone.    The ‘Change; party, which was formed in a hostile break from Talabani’s PUK while he was still in power in Baghdad, has no roots, neither local nor national roots.   Now  Kurdistan is an emerging dictatorship run by a tribal chieftain who has outlasted his one significant opponent but not changed his ethos,

The leadership of Iraqi Kurdistan have unrealistic goals.  They talk about democracy and freedom but they have never dealt realistically with the issues of poverty and diversity.     And now,  the opportunity is waning.   They got better deals from the US and Turkey so the KRG  (Kurdish Regional Government) refused to pay their dues to the federal government of Iraq.   Now they are dumping their oil in Turkey on the cheap through the same channel  ISIS uses and they can’t get their allowance from the federal government of Iraq.  What   goes round comes round, as they say.     The Kurds have US forces using their country as a base, like Kosovo, South Korea, the Philippines, Honduras, Djibouti and many other countries around the world.   And the Peshmerga function as an extension of the imperial forces.   But what are they really getting back?

Turkey, an important NATO (imperial) ally  is bombing Iraqi Kudistan on a daily basis just as it was in 2009.  They say they are attacking PKK camps, but they have killed many civilians and destroyed much of the productive farmland in Kurdistan and poisoned the hills where the water comes from.    The Iraqi Kurds want to do everything in Kurdish but there are few books written in Kurdish so they have traded Arabic for English as the contextual language through which they interact with the wide world.  When I was there they were talking about uniting with the Rojava Kurds, and giving up writing their language in Arabic script.   The western Kurds use the Turkish alphabet.  But Turkey and the wars have taken this opportunity off the table for the time being.

The Kurdish middle class which was rising on a huge wave of hope when I was there in 2009, is losing their mentors and their resources and the connections that supported their aspirations.   They are inundated with refugees from larger Iraq, threatened by ISIS and running out of money.   Yet their government is still pushing to take  more territory from Iraq for their Kurdish nation.      But they can’t take care of or be appropriately responsive to the population they are already responsible for.

It was a terrible shame that the Kurds lost their opportunity to have their own country on the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.   But the United States had a hand in that decision as well.   The decision was made to empower Attaturk, a European born General of the Ottoman Empire who planned to ‘modernize’ (read ‘westernize’) Turkey.   That time has passed and circumstances are changed.  The countries that currently exist in the Middle East may or may not survive but for us here to decide their fates is a continuation of a gross imperial violation of the rights of the people of that region.   When will we learn?

We can’t decide which force in these war torn regions is really the one that will be best for the people there based on our assumptions about their reality.   That is why we have to withdraw from the field rather than attempt to determine what is best for the people and manage events so it will happen.   We can’t control the empire.  We can only resist it’s drive.    For us to decide what is best for the people there is like religious people who think they can apprehend God and God’s will in a particular way.   Our imaginations aren’t big enough to encompass God.  We can’t play god and make decisions for these regions where imperial decision makers have bee wreaking havoc for two centuries.

Rojava is an interesting example of this phenomenon.  The campaign for a free Kurdistan/Rojava was created by empire from the dreams of a lost empire.   The leaders of the Rojava movement are Turkish Kurdish immigrants whose families came to Syria a few decades ago to escape Turkish pogroms against Kurds.   The are not Syrian Kurds.    They are not the majority in the region they covet control over.   There are many Syrian Christians of different stripes living there and other Arabs along with the Syrian Kurds who have established communities there that have existed there for millennia, and have been part of Syria since the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

The YPG are good fighters and advised by the Turkish PKK because they are an extension of the PKK.   To this day, the majority of Kurdish people and Kurdish lands are in Turkey.   Kurdish oppression in Turkey needs to end, but no one is even addressing that issue.   Kurds in Turkey are currently being slaughtered with impunity, sacrificed to President Erdogan’s paranoid grasp on power there.   Even so,  the possibility of independence has been ceded and there is an understanding that somehow the Kurds must become a respected part of Turkish society.

Independent Rojava has a minority of people in Northern Syria supporting it and the YPG were allied with the Syrian government until the Americans came and convinced them,  that they might have their own country just as they convinced the Muslim Brotherhood and other extremist factions in Syria that if  only they would fight the US would a) make sure they won and b) hand them power over the country as allies of the US, Turkey, Israel, the Gulf Emirs etc.   The leaked conversation between Secretary of State John Kerry and representatives of the Syrian ‘opposition’ on the sidelines of a conference last year makes this very clear.   The Turkish reaction to the Kurdish expansion during the war is proof that an independent Rojava is a non-starter on the international chessboard.

The Rojava Kurds talk about democracy in freedom but, presenting themselves as Marxists, and have been taking land from the people who have long lived there and dividing it among the poor,  themselves.   Many of the old Kurdish families are represented among the middle and upper middle class in Damascus.  The Kurdish refugees in Syria have not lived in any kind of unique poverty.    Syria has always been a friendly space for refugees.   The reason the Turkish Kurds didn’t receive Syrian citizenship until shortly after the war  began is related to the fact that none of the many refugees who settled in Syria since the first waves of Palestinians arrived more than 50 years ago have citizenship.

I agree this is a problem, but in the region it has not been the top priority with the people or the government – except the Kurds who came to northern Syria in the 80s.    That is because, for a century,  the the Turkish government of their native homeland has refused them full citizenship.   At the same time,  refugees in Syria have lived well, participated in Syrian society, received ungrudging benefits from the state including education and medical care, and the right to participate in the economy without the particular limitations that exist in many neighboring countries.     Most of the Kurds who had immigrated into northern Syria from Turkey were given Syrian citizenship in 2012 under the initiative taken then to bring the country together and meet the demands of dissident forces that were being drawn into the war against their own country at that time.

Now the Americans want to give them  their own country in a region that is neither their traditional homeland nor ours to give.   The talk about Democracy and Freedom is a great aspiration and they can work on it in a reunited Syria within their own communities if Syria can survive this war without being torn apart..  It is not ours to decide whether or not this should happen any more than it is our right to decide  whether the Syrian government  should  enlist international allies to aid their resistance to an international war of aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic.

We cannot control evolution!   To think we can is to merely embrace another flavor of empire and colonial outreach that feels better to us than the imperial alternatives we understand.   It may feel empowering to believe that we can utilize the forces of empire for some perceived good, but there will always be unintended consequences.   Allowing the people of the region to make their own internal decisions gives them the freedom to express their aspirations in a local context and to deal with their own unintended consequences; to relate to the world around them freely rather than be used by the powerful for the ends of the powerful.

More articles by:

Weekend Edition
January 18, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Melvin Goodman
Star Wars Revisited: One More Nightmare From Trump
John Davis
“Weather Terrorism:” a National Emergency
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Sometimes an Establishment Hack is Just What You Need
Louisa Willcox
Sky Bears, Earth Bears: Finding and Losing True North
Robert Fisk
Bernie Sanders, Israel and the Middle East
Robert Fantina
Pompeo, the U.S. and Iran
David Rosen
The Biden Band-Aid: Will Democrats Contain the Insurgency?
Nick Pemberton
Human Trafficking Should Be Illegal
Steve Early - Suzanne Gordon
Did Donald Get The Memo? Trump’s VA Secretary Denounces ‘Veteran as Victim’ Stereotyping
Andrew Levine
The Tulsi Gabbard Factor
John W. Whitehead
The Danger Within: Border Patrol is Turning America into a Constitution-Free Zone
Dana E. Abizaid
Kafka’s Grave: a Pilgrimage in Prague
Rebecca Lee
Punishment Through Humiliation: Justice For Sexual Assault Survivors
Dahr Jamail
A Planet in Crisis: The Heat’s On Us
John Feffer
Trump Punts on Syria: The Forever War is Far From Over
Dave Lindorff
Shut Down the War Machine!
Mark Ashwill
The Metamorphosis of International Students Into Honorary US Nationalists: a View from Viet Nam
Ramzy Baroud
The Moral Travesty of Israel Seeking Arab, Iranian Money for its Alleged Nakba
Ron Jacobs
Allen Ginsberg Takes a Trip
Jake Johnston
Haiti by the Numbers
Binoy Kampmark
No-Confidence Survivor: Theresa May and Brexit
Victor Grossman
Red Flowers for Rosa and Karl
Cesar Chelala
President Donald Trump’s “Magical Realism”
Christopher Brauchli
An Education in Fraud
Paul Bentley
The Death Penalty for Canada’s Foreign Policy?
David Swanson
Top 10 Reasons Not to Love NATO
Louis Proyect
Breaking the Left’s Gay Taboo
Kani Xulam
A Saudi Teen and Freedom’s Shining Moment
Ralph Nader
Bar Barr or Regret this Dictatorial Attorney General
Jessicah Pierre
A Dream Deferred: MLK’s Dream of Economic Justice is Far From Reality
Edward J. Martin
Glossip v. Gross, the Eighth Amendment and the Torture Court of the United States
Chuck Collins
Shutdown Expands the Ranks of the “Underwater Nation”
Paul Edwards
War Whores
Alycee Lane
Trump’s Federal Government Shutdown and Unpaid Dishwashers
Martha Rosenberg
New Questions About Ritual Slaughter as Belgium Bans the Practice
Wim Laven
The Annual Whitewashing of Martin Luther King Jr.
Nicky Reid
Panarchy as Full Spectrum Intersectionality
Jill Richardson
Hollywood’s Fat Shaming is Getting Old
Nyla Ali Khan
A Woman’s Wide Sphere of Influence Within Folklore and Social Practices
Richard Klin
Dial Israel: Amos Oz, 1939-2018
Graham Peebles
A Global Battle of Values and Ideals
David Rovics
Of Triggers and Bullets
Elliot Sperber
Eddie Spaghetti’s Alphabet
January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall