FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Greed and Politics Should Not Drive Forest Policy

Clearcut. Photo: Jeffrey St. Clair.

The Custer Gallatin National Forest should withdraw its North Bridger Forest Health Project (2,296 acres of commercial logging, including 667 acres of clear-cutting). Despite the government’s claims, there is nothing particularly unhealthy about the public forest in and around Fairy Lake, Battle Ridge Campground and Brackett Creek.

Yes, the snow is deep, growing season short and the soil is thin, but trees somehow make a living in challenging conditions. Clear-cutting in these amazing high-elevation, alpine environments demonstrates how far removed the Forest Service-USDA has become from the public values of a typical local resident. Most individuals and families who travel the short distance to the North Bridgers are expecting a quiet weekend of camping close to town, or a peaceful day of hiking, fishing, hunting or sight-seeing. These are the values important to locals. Out-of-town visitors come to enjoy similar experiences on their national forest. These are sacred places.

It is self-evident that the Forest Service doesn’t value the forest in the same way. Why is this so hard for the Forest Service to understand? National (top-down) timber goals dominate the current system. Same as it ever was. Clear-cutting unroaded alpine forests defies common sense, is contrary to scientific knowledge, and lacks any sense of moral integrity to the public and the forestry profession. What a ridiculous place to manage a tree farm.

Major environmental laws passed in the 1970s to reign in the agency’s obsession with logging have not achieved the “multiple-use; sustained-yield” goals what Congress hoped for. The consistent agency behavior is industrial timber production. The good news is: Congress is currently considering a comprehensive remedy for this outrageous perversion of values (H.R. 1321/S. 827) based on ecosystems and linkage corridors, not corporate greed.

The reason the agency finds itself in federal court is its failure to conduct routine environmental analysis of the forest prior to designating it for inclusion in the government’s latest “insect and disease treatment program.” The logging project also shares a boundary with the Bridger Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA). Unroaded forest adjacent to the IRA should have been evaluated for its unique wilderness characteristics and potential for congressional wilderness designation. In their haste to lay waste to these unroaded areas the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Plaintiffs have requested that the court set aside (declarative judgment and injunctive relief) the ill-advised project. The Forest Service could simply drop the project to avoid yet another knock-down, drag-out court battle and self-inflicted public exposure to its habitual abuse of special places the American public holds dear.

The assumption that bulldozing new logging roads, clear-cutting and “thinning” primeval forests will mitigate insect activity, cure disease, preclude large, high-severity wildfires or “restore” forest ecosystems is not supported by science or common sense. The assumption is simply wrong. Climate dictates forest health, not the USFS-USDA. Drought, high temperatures, low humidity and high winds drive the big fires everyone fears most.

The change we seek in the agency’s behavior is blockaded by the simple truth that Congress funds the Forest Service each year expecting unrealistic timber-production goals. And that sabotages any reasonable hope for sound management of our national forests. It’s extortion. No change will come until management is based on the land’s capability, respect for natures limits and economic reality.

Greed and politics prevent protection of the most important of all public-forest values: water, wildlife habitat, wilderness, responsible recreation and carbon storage. When we change the politics, we can change forest policy. Until then, the fight will continue. Don’t be a spectator, and remember always, in a totalitarian top-down government silence is consent.

More articles by:

Steve Kelly is a an artist and serves as a member of the board of directors of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies. He lives in Bozeman, Montana.  

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
July 16, 2019
Conn Hallinan
The World Needs a Water Treaty
Kenneth Surin
Britain Grovels: the Betrayal of the British Ambassador
Christopher Ketcham
This Land Was Your Land
Gary Leupp
What Right Has Britain to Seize an Iranian Tanker Off Spain?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Democratic Virtues in Electing a President
Thomas Knapp
Free Speech Just isn’t That Complicated
Binoy Kampmark
The Resigning Ambassador
Howard Lisnoff
Everybody Must Get Stoned
Nicky Reid
Nukes For Peace?
Matt Johnson
The United States of Overreaction
Cesar Chelala
Children’s Trafficking and Exploitation is a Persistent, Dreary Phenomenon
Martin Billheimer
Sylvan Shock Theater
July 15, 2019
David Altheide
The Fear Party
Roger Harris
UN High Commissioner on Human Rights Bachelet’s Gift to the US: Justifying Regime Change in Venezuela
John Feffer
Pyongyang on the Potomac
Vincent Kelley
Jeffrey Epstein and the Collapse of Europe
Robert Fisk
Trump’s Hissy-Fit Over Darroch Will Blow a Chill Wind Across Britain’s Embassies in the Middle East
Binoy Kampmark
Juggling with the Authoritarians: Donald Trump’s Diplomatic Fake Book
Dean Baker
The June Jobs Report and the State of the Economy
Michael Hudson – Bonnie Faulkner
De-Dollarizing the American Financial Empire
Kathy Kelly
Remnants of War
B. Nimri Aziz
The Power of Our Human Voice: From Marconi to Woods Hole
Elliot Sperber
Christianity Demands a Corpse 
Weekend Edition
July 12, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Skull of Death: Mass Media, Inauthentic Opposition, and Eco-Existential Reality in a Pre-Fascist Age of Appeasement
T.J. Coles
“Strategic Extremism”: How Republicans and Establishment Democrats Use Identity Politics to Divide and Rule
Rob Urie
Toward an Eco-Socialist Revolution
Gregory Elich
How Real is the Trump Administration’s New Flexibility with North Korea?
Jason Hirthler
The Journalists Do The Shouting
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Pâté Politics in the Time of Trump and Pelosi
Andrew Levine
The Electoral Circus as the End of Its Initial Phase Looms
David Swanson
Earth Over the Brink
Ron Jacobs
Presidential Papers
Robert Hunziker
The Flawed Food Dependency
Dave Lindorff
Defeating the Trump Administration’s Racist, Republican-Rescuing Census Corruption
Martha Rosenberg
Pathologizing Kids, Pharma Style
Kathleen Wallace
Too Horrible to Understand, Too Horrible to Ignore
Ralph Nader
An Unsurpassable Sterling Record of Stamina!
Paul Tritschler
Restricted View: the British Legacy of Eugenics
John Feffer
Trump’s Bluster Diplomacy
Thomas Knapp
Did Jeffrey Epstein “Belong to Intelligence?”
Nicholas Buccola
Colin Kaepernick, Ted Cruz, Frederick Douglass and the Meaning of Patriotism
P. Sainath
It’s Raining Sand in Rayalaseema
Charles Davis
Donald Trump’s Fake Isolationism
Michael Lukas
Delisting Wolves and the Impending Wolf Slaughter
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Shaking Off Capitalism for Ecological Civilization
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail