FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

When a President is Unfit

The forces aligned against President Trump are many and varied. This much is clear, and even more, brought clear by the organs that guard state power, not the least of these being inherently pro-state, corporate media.

A recently revealed memo by Rich Higgins, a top official of the National Security Council, was very interesting on this count and was responsible for his firing. Penned in May under the title, Potus & Political Warfare, he offers a full array of Trump’s opposing forces, his intention seeming to be to leave nobody out.

His dominant theme is that cultural Marxism erodes the nation’s Judeo-Christian culture. He restricts cultural Marxism to relate to “programs and activities that arise out of Gramsci Marxism, Fabian Socialism and most directly from the Frankfurt School. The Frankfurt strategy deconstructs societies through attacks on culture by imposing a dialectic that forces unresolvable contradictions under the rubric of critical theory. The result is induced nihilism, a belief in everything that is actually the belief in nothing.”

Those either benefited by, or captured by, the cultural Marxist meme include mainstream media, academia, the deep state, global corporatists & bankers, both leaderships in our two-party state, and Islamists. At the international level they are joined by the European Union, the UN, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the Organization of Islamic Co-operation, and the International Muslim Brotherhood.

Higgins details the political warfare directed against Trump — “operating in a battle-space that reflects the left’s vision” —  that are “structured to force him to assume a reactive posture that assures inadequate responses”. He goes further, concluding that “the defense of President Trump is the defense of America”.

Strangely, for this he was fired by NSC head, H.R. McMaster. The thinking is that, without directly naming him, Higgins placed McMaster as enabling this sinister cabal, and McMaster caught wise.

It’s easy to read Higgins’ memo as the ravings of a right-winger, but harder to deny the multitude of forces aligned against Trump. The common professional politician, the noble business titan, and the learned psychiatrist may all make the observation that Trump is unfit to be president.

This is an interesting word, unfit. Merriam-Webster offers three definitions:

1/ not adapted to a purpose (unsuitable)

2/ not qualified (incapable, incompetent)

3/ physically or mentally unsound

The psychiatrist will be centered on (c). The politician and the businessman will be centered on (b). All three will be quick to agree that (b) and (c), taken together, comprise a set of necessary conditions for the unfit label to be attached to Trump.

One can go further and say that all the unfit accusations we have heard so far from any source in any discipline are based predominantly on (b) and (c), and, if based on (a), the purpose would be left ambiguous and not rigorously defined.

Now, because there is no doubt that the deep state and the military-industrial-intelligence-security complex together with neoconservative elements are intent on bringing Trump down, what is it about his unfit condition that inspires their hostility?

We had eight years of George W. Bush. Cartoonists had a field day. He was the subject of great ridicule. The conditions of (b) and (c) for his being unfit were said to apply by many on the left, but he was not met with the hostile forces mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

Trump in many ways exceeds Bush. He’s not only a fool but seems to relish it. No humility, no honesty, character flaws coming out of his ears. On (b) and (c) he is trump but the opposition to him is on a different level than was Bush.

A point can be made that it is within condition (a), not adapted to a purpose, that opposition to him is manifest. The purpose that he is not adapted to is the continuation of America’s drive for world hegemony to include enlargement of NATO and the continuing encirclement of our necessary enemies, Russia and China.

Once he signaled that Russia didn’t have to remain an enemy, and offered that Putin seemed like a decent fellow, he was deemed unfit by this establishment. They couldn’t care less about his personality. They were through that with Bush. What’s needed is obedience to method and this is where he differed from Bush.

Putin had a cute response to the Russian election interference slander. What is the United States, a banana republic that we can interfere with their election?

For the right or the wrong reasons, Trump tied his ship to Russia. The interests that want Russia brought down immediately went to work on bringing Trump down.

If someone has followed this reasoning, what is there to root for when the military-industrial-intelligence-security complex has its way, with or without Trump?

More articles by:

James Rothenberg can be reached at:  jrothenberg@taconic.net

September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savoir
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail