FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Answering the Moral Warriors

This is an open letter in response to David Aaronovitch’s invitation in The Guardian (G2 18.02.03) to the peace marchers of London to answer a few questions. But it is also an answer to his more evangelical colleagues like Christopher Hitchens, whose piece in The Mirror on Tuesday (18.02.03) came closest to giving the fundamentalist rantings of the Bush cabinet some rhetorical coherence. They are the moral warriors who consciously or otherwise have become apologists for George Bush’s new world order and welcome the proposed full spectrum dominance of the United States. They constitute a minority, but a minority in positions of disproportionate power, both in media and politics. Their invitations to engage in debate must not, and have not, be neglected.

So this is to you David, an old marcher, from a marginally younger one. You ask a hell of a lot of questions, but I hope this answers their general drift. You pretend to misunderstand Tony Benn when he calls for inspections in USA, Israel and Britain. But surely a person of your intelligence and moral integrity cannot deny that these states have stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, WMDs like ‘bunker buster’, cluster bombs and Depleted Uranium shells and a history of using them directly as in Hiroshima,Vietnam, Serbia, Afghanistan, and Iraq. More sinisterly, they actively encourage the exporting of these weapons and technologies globally. I cannot name a Welsh village that ahs been chemically attacked by Britain but I can name Britain and USA as being the chief suppliers of Saddam’s arsenal in his war against Iran and his massacre of Kurds. So pardon me if I don’t swallow the line about this war being against the proliferation of WMDs. If you think war is a sound strategy of containment of aggressive states with a track record of using WMDs, are you prepared to back the invasions of India, Pakistan, and North Korea?

No court in the world is powerful to try those in power. But you seem to find the fact that we find people like Richard Perle, John Negroponte and Donald Rumsfeld little better than criminals astonishing. As an advisor to the extremist Netanyahu government in Israel, Perle advocated a no-negotiation policy with Palestinians and forcible expulsion of civilians from West bank and Gaza. Negroponte personally oversaw covert anti-democratic operations in Nicaragua and Honduras. They are responsible for aiding, planning and abetting the murder, torture and expulsion of civilians in the middle ?east and Latin America, these individuals are criminals in our books. Are we wrong to be sceptical of their proposed role in Iraq? That their ousting of Saddam Hussein will lead to the appointment of a similar anti-democratic regime, but this time a pro-U.S. one? This is already the fears of Iraqis in exile like Kanaan Makiya, whose cause you pretend to champion.

You sneer at us for being the majority. To illustrate fears of mob rule, you cite the case of anti-asylum hysteria in Britain. This, David, is a clear but clever case of false analogy. Some of us have been working against the BNP and tabloid- engineered lies about illegal immigrants in poor deprived British cities. You should come and see us sometime in places like Sunderland and Burnley. So we don’t actually need a warning about mob hysteria. Especially since, contrary to what The Sun would like to believe, the majority of people in Britain are tolerant and welcoming of the multi-racial society and sympathetic to the plight of the refugees when they are not being constantly misinformed. I defy the BNP and the Sun to muster up not 2 million, but half that number, to demonstrate in favour of keeping refugees out of Britain. They are not the majority. Why doesn’t Blair demonstrate his moral courage against them? Why back down and appease them all the time? Why withdraw the plans for asylum centres when a misinformed third of some small town carry placards when he is determined not to listen to millions on Iraq? Do you detect hypocrisy there and how wrong you are to compare us to them?

We are against war and not containment. The total volume of surveillance on Iraq is among the heaviest in the world. Today (18.02.), Iraq has agreed to let U2 spy planes to fly into its airspace. By all means let us keep up the scrutiny. Let us support permanent inspections and let us actively discourage any arms trade with the regime. Let human rights monitoring be a permanent part of the inspection regime. A vast majority of us are in favour of all this. What we are not in favour of, and what people like CASI and ARROW have been tirelessly campaigning for more than a decade now, is to end the sanctions that play directly into the hand of Saddam Hussein and has led to the unimaginable sufferings of the Iraqi civilians. To now argue that only a war can end that suffering that USA and Britain have actively promoted in the first place is not only morally repugnant, but strategically disastrous. We have no doubts that France and Russia have their own agendas in their opposition to war. But at least the fallout of that policy is far less destructive for Iraq that the Blair-Bush doctrine.

This position, whether you agree with it or not, is much more cohesive and thought out than your portrait of us as confused collaborators of Saddam Hussein suggests. I have been in Britain for six years now, and been teaching in a British university for the last three years. For much of this time I have been wailing at the political apathy of Britons young and old. But I have never been as proud to be in this country as I was on Saturday when I saw school kids marching with CND veterans of the 60s, and when my students ran out of coaches to come down from Newcastle to London because every single one of them had been booked already. What we are saying is that we will not play this fatal game of Bush and Bin Laden and the doctrine of unending war anymore. Have a look at Afghanistan where things have now reverted to warlords and fiefdoms and Pashtun discontent. Where attacks on UN and US forces are growing by the month and where members of the unpopular (and as yet unelected) government have routinely suffered assassination attempts. Is this what you call hopeful? Instead of scorning us and supporting the anti-democratic diktats of Britain and US, I wish you could have been there, free of fear and mistrust, just like you were in the days when you marched against the killings in Soweto.

Dr PABLO MUKHERJEE teaches in the school of english at University of Newcastle. He can be reached at: pablo.mukherjee@ncl.ac.uk

 

More articles by:
June 20, 2018
Henry Giroux
Trump’s War on Children is an act of State Terrorism
Bill Hackwell
Unprecedented Cruelty Against Immigrants and Their Children
Paul Atwood
“What? You Think We’re So Innocent?”
Nicola Perugini
The Palestinian Tipping Point
K.J. Noh
Destiny and Daring: South Korean President Moon Jae-In’s Impossible Journey Towards Peace
Gary Leupp
Jeff Sessions and St. Paul’s Clear and Wise Commands
M. G. Piety
On Speaking Small Truths to Power
Dave Lindorff
Some Straight Talk for Younger People on Social Security (and Medicare too)
George Wuerthner
The Public Value of Forests as Carbon Reserves
CJ Hopkins
Confession of a Putin-Nazi Denialist
David Schultz
Less Than Fundamental:  the Myth of Voting Rights in America
Rohullah Naderi
The West’s Over-Publicized Development Achievements in Afghanistan 
Dan Bacher
California Lacks Real Marine Protection as Offshore Drilling Expands in State Waters
Lori Hanson – Miguel Gomez
The Students of Nicaragua’s April Uprising
Russell Mokhiber
Are Corporations Behind Frivolous Lawsuits Against Corporations?
Michael Welton
Infusing Civil Society With Hope for a Better World
June 19, 2018
Ann Robertson - Bill Leumer
We Can Thank Top Union Officials for Trump
Lawrence Davidson
The Republican Party Falls Apart, the Democrats Get Stuck
Sheldon Richman
Trump, North Korea, and Iran
Richard Rubenstein
Trump the (Shakespearean) Fool: a New Look at the Dynamics of Trumpism
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Protect Immigrant Rights; End the Crises That Drive Migration
Gary Leupp
Norway: Just Withdraw From NATO
Kristine Mattis
Nerd Culture, Adultolescence, and the Abdication of Social Priorities
Mike Garrity
The Forest Service Should Not be Above the Law
Colin Todhunter
Pro-GMO Activism And Smears Masquerade As Journalism: From Seralini To Jairam Ramesh, Aruna Rodrigues Puts The Record Straight
Doug Rawlings
Does the Burns/Novick Vietnam Documentary Deserve an Emmy?
Kenneth Surin
2018 Electioneering in Appalachian Virginia
Nino Pagliccia
Chrystia Freeland Fails to See the Emerging Multipolar World
John Forte
Stuart Hall and Us
June 18, 2018
Paul Street
Denuclearize the United States? An Unthinkable Thought
John Pilger
Bring Julian Assange Home
Conn Hallinan
The Spanish Labyrinth
Patrick Cockburn
Attacking Hodeidah is a Deliberate Act of Cruelty by the Trump Administration
Gary Leupp
Trump Gives Bibi Whatever He Wants
Thomas Knapp
Child Abductions: A Conversation It’s Hard to Believe We’re Even Having
Robert Fisk
I Spoke to Palestinians Who Still Hold the Keys to Homes They Fled Decades Ago – Many are Still Determined to Return
Steve Early
Requiem for a Steelworker: Mon Valley Memories of Oil Can Eddie
Jim Scheff
Protect Our National Forests From an Increase in Logging
Adam Parsons
Reclaiming the UN’s Radical Vision of Global Economic Justice
Dean Baker
Manufacturing Production Falls in May and No One Notices
Laura Flanders
Bottom-Up Wins in Virginia’s Primaries
Binoy Kampmark
The Anguish for Lost Buildings: Embers and Death at the Victoria Park Hotel
Weekend Edition
June 15, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Dan Kovalik
The US & Nicaragua: a Case Study in Historical Amnesia & Blindness
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Yellow Journalism and the New Cold War
Charles Pierson
The Day the US Became an Empire
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail