FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

The Great Wall of UC Berkeley vs. Baby Face Shapiro

Photo by Gage Skidmore | CC BY 2.0

The UC administration has gone AWOL, deserting their posts and responsibilities as leaders of one of the world’s finest public universities.  The  current threat is Baby Face Ben Shapiro, a smart aleck, wisecracking, racist, sexist, misogynist, Islamaphobic jerk to be sure. The little bully right wing prodigy argues that transgender people are delusional and suffering from mental illness — after all, so many commit suicide during their transitions —  and  that Israel is a victim state justifying its verging on its  genocidal human rights abuses against Palestinians, that Black people are poor, criminally inclined, drug addicted, homicidal losers because of their undeveloped culture, that abortion is evil and women who have an abortion should be criminalized, that the concept of white privilege is an  excuse for racism against white people, that ‘Black Bodies Matter’ is a stupid and violent mobilization of people who hate police, law and order.  He thinks it is a crime against American families  that schools educate young students to respect gays and transgender students in their classrooms. And these are just a few of his talks available on You Tube.  So he’s a jerk and the university is giving this schmuck all the publicity he wants, and he wants there to be riots – he tells the media that he expects riots,  and he says it with a smirk. Gotcha, Berkeley!

It is unbelievable that our university —  and can we still call it ‘our’ university when there is no shared governance in these decision — is  putting up  obstructions, temporary walls but walls all the same  to close down the very  center of the student free speech arena. Not only is this ridiculous, overkill, it is insulting to our student body and an unintentional dog whistle to our students to riot. The majority of our students have no idea who Shapiro is, but they know or will know as soon as the barricades go up, that he is a very dangerous, extremely controversial,  physical threat  them.  Meanwhile,  Baby Face is laughing, making fools of the free speech campus and basking in the narcissistic  personal drama.

If the clichéd but useful  answer to hate speech  is more speech, why is the university closing down buildings that include  the student centers including the   student learning center (for  students with disabilities)  and canceling  lectures, closing meeting rooms and classrooms, and in our department of anthropology canceling our 2017 Distinguished Lecturer, Prof. Anna Tsing (UCSC)  because her talk was to take place later this month during Milo Yiannopoulos herald return to the Berkeley campus.

Why aren’t department leaders, faculty, GSIs  and  Student Organizations  hosting counter events, teach- ins, timed and presented during  the controversial atl right line up of fall speakers:  Shapiro,  Milo,  and Coulter’s tirades?  Where are the  alternatives? Its not to late to hold conferences, debates, public events  and non-violent  demonstrations around  these talks.

Our university administrators’ fall back position is: ignore it, turn you backs, don’t go there.  Or, Feeling bad? feeling sad? We will provide free counseling and tissues. Your classes are interrupted, your student union is closed by the disruptions?  Why not go shopping?  See a shrink? We shrinking ourselves. We need to be as strong as we can be.  Its OK to cry, its appropriate to feel sick to your stomach, but  look for support from your friends and colleagues on campus.

The university simply cannot play possum any longer.  We have values, mores, rules of conduct, rules  of engagement, all of which are being overturned by fear: fear of law suits, fear of the ACLU, fear of wealthy donors, fear of being more than a passive instrument surrounded by lawyers in  closed door meetings.  We need transparency.

And, we absolutely do not have to accept every single ‘hate man’ or woman who wants to the right to demean, dehumanize , threaten,  provoke and upend our primary university mission as seekers of truth and guardians of intellectual freedom.  The first amendment is a work in progress. It evolves, there can be and have been amendments.  At present we are ’stuck’ with the Skokie affair that gave the right to the KKK to march through the village of Skokie (National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie432 U.S. 43 (1977).  That ruling needs to be corrected.  We need strong legal  scholars and thinkers and researchers  to push against it, to recognize when the rule of law is illegal (  as Laura Nader put it).  The current  law  fetishizes free speech to include  the rights of a neo-Nazi organization that is  to this day responsible for killing Black citizens in Alabama and disposing  their bodies in the Alabama River. (see Scheper-Hughes “No on Sessions” Berkeley blog). The KKK in Mississippi beat up Mario Savio in 1964. In 1967  I was in a truck with local civil rights leaders, Jesse  and Ethel Brooks of Wilcox County, Alabama when a car of  KKK guys shot a bullet that grazed Ethel Brooks’ forehead. The KKK are still killers today.

Beyond that, hate speech harms people;  there is no doubt about it.  “Words are deeds”, according to Wittgenstein.  J. L. Austin (1975) and John R. Searle (1970) wrote  books and essays on speech act theory.  They identified  “performative utterances “ and  “illocutionary acts” that only assert facts or values but that actually bring about some new state of affairs.

Hate speech can make people hate themselves, it can  make one want to crawl into a  corner and disappear.  It can makes one wish one was dead or worse had never been born, the  ultimate existential black hole.  Hate speech is a speech act  that can harm the central nervous system, it can result in PTSD, and  when used by police and jailers to humiliate prisoners   hate speech is  psychological torture, a civil rights and  human rights violation.  In short, Hate speech is an act of violence.  The First Amendment is ignorant of the vast research on these topics by medical anthropologists, clinical psychologists,  and neurological scientists.

More articles by:

Nancy Scheper-Hughes is Chancellor’s Professor of Medical Anthropology, University of California Berkeley. Scheper-Hughes participated in a Vatican plenary on Human Trafficking in April 2015. She has published a series of articles on the “conversion” of Pope Francis, including, “Can God Forgive Jorge Bergoglio?” (2013, CounterPunch,;  “The Final Conversion of Pope Francis” (with Jennifer S. Hughes),  and “Face to Face with Pope Francis”  (2015), Huffington Post.  

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
February 26, 2020
Matthew Hoh
Heaven Protect Us From Men Who Live the Illusion of Danger: Pete Buttigieg and the US Military
Jefferson Morley
How the US Intelligence Community is Interfering in the 2020 Elections
Patrick Cockburn
With Wikileaks, Julian Assange Did What All Journalists Should Do
Manuel García, Jr.
Climate Change and Voting 2020
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Russiagate: The Toxic Gift That Keeps on Giving
Andrew Bacevich
Going Off-Script in the Age of Trump
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Anti-Russian Xenophobia Reaches Ridiculous Levels
Ted Rall
Don’t Worry, Centrists. Bernie Isn’t Radical.
George Wuerthner
Whatever Happened to the Greater Yellowstone Coalition?
Scott Tucker
Democratic Socialism in the Twenty-First Century
Jonah Raskin
The Call of the Wild (2020): A Cinematic Fairy Tale for the Age of Environmental Disaster
George Ochenski
Why We Shouldn’t Run Government Like a Business
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Imperium’s Face: Day One of the Extradition Hearings
Nozomi Hayase
Assange’s Extradition Hearing Reveals Trump’s War on Free Press Is Targeting WikiLeaks Publisher
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon? (Part Two)
Max Moran
Meet Brad Karp, the Top Lawyer Bankrolling the Democrats
David Swanson
Nonviolent Action for Peace
Ed Sanders
The Ex-Terr GooGoo Eyes “The Russkies Did it!” Plot
February 25, 2020
Michael Hudson
The Democrats’ Quandary: In a Struggle Between Oligarchy and Democracy, Something Must Give
Paul Street
The “Liberal” Media’s Propaganda War on Bernie Sanders
Sheldon Richman
The Non-Intervention Principle
Nicholas Levis
The Real Meaning of Red Scare 3.0
John Feffer
Cleaning Up Trump’s Global Mess
David Swanson
How Are We Going to Pay for Saving Trillions of Dollars?
Ralph Nader
Three Major News Stories That Need To Be Exposed
John Eskow
What Will You Do If the Democrats Steal It from Sanders?
Dean Baker
What If Buttigieg Said That He Doesn’t Accept the “Fashionable” View That Climate Change is a Problem?
Jack Rasmus
The Nevada Caucus and the Desperation of Democrat Elites
Howard Lisnoff
The Powerful Are Going After Jane Fonda Again
Binoy Kampmark
Viral Losses: Australian Universities, Coronavirus and Greed
John W. Whitehead
Gun-Toting Cops Endanger Students and Turn Schools into Prisons
Marshall Sahlins
David Brooks, Public Intellectual
February 24, 2020
Stephen Corry
New Deal for Nature: Paying the Emperor to Fence the Wind
M. K. Bhadrakumar
How India’s Modi is Playing on Trump’s Ego to His Advantage
Jennifer Matsui
Tycoon Battle-Bots Battle Bernie
Robert Fisk
There’s Little Chance for Change in Lebanon, Except for More Suffering
Rob Wallace
Connecting the Coronavirus to Agriculture
Bill Spence
Burning the Future: the Growing Anger of Young Australians
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Binoy Kampmark
The Priorities of General Motors: Ditching Holden
George Wuerthner
Trojan Horse Timber Sales on the Bitterroot
Rick Meis
Public Lands “Collaboration” is Lousy Management
David Swanson
Bloomberg Has Spent Enough to Give a Nickel to Every Person Whose Life He’s Ever Damaged
Peter Cohen
What Tomorrow May Bring: Politics of the People
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon?
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail