Convenient Untruths About “Human Nature:” Can People Deal with Climate Change and Nuclear Weapons?

At this most critical of times, do current erroneous assumptions about human nature play a role at a deep level in the prevalent responses to catastrophes?   Apropos,  Raymond Williams summarized Antonio  Gramsci’s view of hegemony as a “central system of practices, meanings and values saturating the consciousness of a society at a much deeper level than ordinary notions of ideology.”[1]

There are new and old normals and it is hard to know where public knowledge is on this.    Movies from similar times evoked normal, even beautiful scenes from daily life, of intimacy and love, but with ordinary life shadowed by foreboding threats:  The Garden of the Finzi Continis  under Nazism, Burnt by the Sun under Stalin’s terror, Hiroshima Mon Amour and nuclear holocaust.  Focusing on Trump and immediate realities is urgent, but now looms the specter of human extinction.

Trump has brought increased attention to social pathology.  An observation made by Canadian First Nations lawyer Pamela Palmater pinpoints a core problem in Canada when it comes to understanding people and society, but it is applicable to the broad public.    She writes that “the difficult part about public discourse related to genocide is that the majority of Canadians don’t have all the facts.” The public knows even less about the extinction threat of nuclear weapons and climate change.

Cognitive science, biology and American psychiatry now assume the mantle of defining human nature.   Behavior is said to be hard-wired, “in the brain”, programmed,  in the DNA. [2] Humans are presumed to be addicted to consumption, unable to forego gratification, unable to endure stress and frustration, require optimism and success.  They are primarily motivated by self-interest, do not have a rational understanding of time as they are unable to think much beyond the immediate future, are capable of relating or empathizing at most to a small group of people, and predisposed to fight/flight/freeze reactions.

Human psychology is understood through algorithms and brain imaging.    The field of Game Theory gave us the Prisoners  Dilemma which is about self-serving behavior.   Artificial Intelligence can be programmed to make moral decisions.  Emotions are said to come from a primitive part of the brain.  This is all far removed from what people actually do.  Real prisoners have great capacity to cooperate such as in prisoners’ strikes, and even the most violent criminal acts cannot be reduced to a formula but are highly individual.   Rage, too, can be moral:   Benjamin Ferencz, the 97-years-old,  last-surviving Nuremberg prosecutor, says that he is “boiling with anger all the time” and “won’t give up fighting for peace”.

This human nature model arose at the same time as neo-liberalism and management theory.  William James wrote about a distinctly American version coming from the widespread practice of instantaneous born-again religious experience – no crise de conscience required.   The enshrining of the pursuit of happiness, positive thinking, and optimism glosses over the actual state of the world and over the wide range of human experience.   The individualistic ideal of “full self-realization of human potential” is a compelling promise of capitalist and even some anti-capitalist movements and is libertarian and ahistorical.

The words “people”, “person”, and “human” are themselves corrupted.  In today’s world, many people are not considered persons at all.  As the late poet Eduardo Galeano writes, more and more of the world’s people are “The nobodies: nobody’s children, owners of nothing. The nobodies: the no-ones, the nobodied, … Who are not human beings, but human resources.  Who do not have names, but numbers.”  Monbiot exposed how Britain’s chief economist, Nicholas Stern, quantified people’s right to live on the basis of wealth:  Stern  justified expanding Heathrow airport capacity because a rich person would lose money having to wait for a flight, and this wealth was worth more than the wealth of people dying due to aviation’s high greenhouse gas emissions (Heathrow is slated to add 260,000 extra flights/year, and aviation emissions remain exempt under Kyoto).

“Personhood” leaves out real people.   Corporations, citizens from certain countries, and special categories of refugees qualify for various personhood rights.   Populationists and some environmentalists fetishize a pristine nature without people and  believe that there are “too many people” for the Earth’s carrying capacity (billions too many according to GAIA guru James Lovelock).    Only select persons suffer trauma and “humanitarian disasters.”  “Humanitarian” is degraded by the doctrine of the “least possible evil” which allows horrific violence if it is calculated to be less than even worse possible violence. [3]

Inaction about the critical situation is often attributed to denial.  But is it really denial if the facts are not even known.  And does knowledge about severe threats necessarily lead to denial?    Other psychological processes differ from the prevalent human nature framing.

Anxiety can arise because of the realistic perception of a danger situation.  Freud’s view is that anxiety does not necessarily become overwhelming.  The signal of anxiety can lead to a pause that delays action and that allows time to assess a threat.

There is a maturational capacity to understand objective reality, what Freud called “secondary process” thinking.   This contrasts with  “primary process” as seen in dreams and in the thinking of young children: the absence of a realistic sense of the duration of time,  egocentric theories of causality, conflating words with things,  reversal of meanings, confusions about animate and inanimate.    These early forms of thinking can persist for many reasons.

Mature adults are capable of having a constant sense of other people’s existence so that no one is invisible.  This is closely tied to being able to feel ambivalence, that the world is not simply divided between ideal good people and evil bad people.  Early on, young children comfort themselves with ideal good objects like soft furry animals.   The soft, furry polar bear on melting ice has come to signify the tragedy of climate change; what about concern for the tragedy of all other people in the world?

The world’s people are generally left out of discourses on climate change and nuclear weapons.  Manhattan Project Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman reported that after the first atom bomb test at Alamogordo, “’There were tears and laughter…. We beat each other on the back, our elation knew no bounds ….  the gadget worked!’ Feynman got his bongo drums out and led a snake dance through the whole Tech Area.” [4]  In a recent talk about Los Alamos, Feynman recalled how he looked at the world differently, picturing destroyed bridges and buildings — but how about the people?  It is only since the 2014 Vienna Humanitarian Pledge that there is focus on the human consequences of nuclear war.

As in the animistic thinking of young children, climate change is discussed as a de-personalized threat to the “planet”, to ”civilization as we know it”, to “organized civilization”, but not as a current killer of hundreds of thousands of people.    Climate itself is personified,  as in fighting, defeating, battling, combating climate rather than the people and practices causing it.  Reports of species extinctions leave out the catastrophe for people.  The geological term “Anthropocene” puts into the perspective of eons the rapidity and extent of anthropogenic climate change,  but it also  abstracts and distracts from the specific people who are so wholly culpable and from the time scale of a miniscule few years for the needed radical changes.

There are wild gaps in reality testing.    Jim White, a climate scientist begins a lecture by dropping a pencil on the ground.  He demonstrates the physical law of gravity which he cannot change, but he can change his own behavior and choose not to drop the pencil.  Obama spoke at Hiroshima as if atom bombs just dropped out of the sky.  Current agreements and solutions to  climate and nuclear threats ignore the physical laws of nature, as if physical laws can wait,  and as if  humans are incapable of stopping.   Since the 1960s when both extinction threats were known, the response has been to “transition”.

Time frames are cited arbitrarily and without context.   Launch time for nuclear weapons on high-alert is inconsistently reported as several minutes, 9 minutes, 15 minutes.  The human context is that Russians do not have a missile defense system that can detect missiles over the horizon, so their decision to launch a strike would have to be made within minutes, without accurately knowing whether there are indeed incoming nuclear missiles.  President Trump is impulsive so there is no time for thinking and for reality testing.

The number signifying global temperature is reified as a thing in itself.    In a recent interview, Naomi Klein told Jeremy Scahill “we still have a chance of halting warming at 2C, or even the Paris target of 1.5C. But if we do everything we can and mobilize wartime efforts, we could move quickly enough to prevent warming of more than two degrees, or if we are extremely lucky, 1.5 degrees Celsius.”[1]   This is incorrect.  The baseline for measuring the 1.2C rise in temperature due to climate change is inconsistently reported as  1780, 1880, 1945 – the dating makes a huge difference in understanding the accelerated rate of change because there has been a 0.2C in just the last few years.   Overshooting the 1.5C target is inevitable within a few years.  1.5C is twice the global average temperature increase that has already caused major shifts in the entire Earth climate system.

In the climate system,  heat absorption in the ocean, and the changing proportion of fresh to salt water due to melting ice, already cause changes in ocean stratification leading to decreased oxygen, to shifting ocean currents (changing Gulf Stream), interactions with the atmosphere (changing jet stream), accelerated melting of ice shelves from below due to contact with the warming ocean,  powerful waves eroding the  grounding line so that melting glaciers can flow into the sea. The effect of fresh water infusion becomes self-generating and amplifying.   Climate modelling has substantially underestimated the amount of sea level rise and of oxygen depletion.

There are many human causes of these disasters, but not hard-wiring.   The safety of humanity becomes secondary to group loyalty,  subservience to authority, association with narcissistic leaders.  Climate scientists  write about these processes within scientific groups that interfere with objectivity. [5]  Robert J. Lifton describes intense male bonding among groups of nuclear weapons scientists who “didn’t want to appear weak”.  Male narcissism is endemic in the national security insider group and puerile male bonding in elite financial cliques like the Bohemian Club and Yale’s Skull and Bones.  [6]

Climate scientists at times put forth erroneous assumptions about human nature.  James Hansen’s fee-and-dividend carbon tax assumes that only higher carbon prices combined with monetary rewards will change behavior.  Climatologist Michael Mann assumes that drought was a main cause of Syrian violence, overlooking severe immiseration due to neo-liberal restructuring and land enclosures that caused huge migration into urban slums.  Historically, droughts and water conflict in themselves do not cause violence; people have customarily worked out agreements to share resources.  The misinterpretation of violence is accepted as fact and has already become the rationale for the militarization of climate security.  Guy McPherson advises people to enjoy today — carpe diem, as if people cannot sustain a range of difficult feelings, hard work, interdependence, and a realistic sense of what needs to be done right now and in the long term.

After years of proliferating nuclear weapons and greenhouse gas emissions, the main solutions remain war and “green” technology.   It is simply assumed that people can’t talk together and plan the logical cutbacks that would Immediately reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water loss and save lives.  The big energy and water users are aviation and shipping, the military, mining, inessential manufacturing, industrial agriculture, cement and steel production, the internet.  Saving lives requires open borders and debt abolition – not just renewable energy.   There is a magical wish that progressive institutions will someday fix everything without taking into account the critical time frame posed by the Earth’s physical laws.  The bogeyman is economic collapse, even though that economy is destroying the world’s majority population.   Current efforts to address these crises are partial and in disarray.  In Greek tragedy, the chorus bemoans too late what could have been known and simply waits for the deus ex machina.   Our survival depends on mature concern and responsibility for all people.


[1] Perry Anderson. The Heirs of Gramsci.”  New Left Review. July/Aug 2016.  P. 73.

[2] Richard Levins and Richard Lewontin(1985), The Dialectical Biologist, Harvard University Press, and Biology Under the Influence (2007).  Monthly Review Press.

[3] Eyal Weizman, (2011). The Least of All Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza. Verso.

[4]  Jennet Conant (2005). 109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the secret city of Los Alamos. Simon and Schuster: New York.  P. 314-316.

[5] for example, James Hansen (2009) Storms of My Grandchildren (2009), Peter Wadhams (2016) A Farewell to Ice, David Wasdell https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/may/15/ipcc-un-climate-reports-diluted-protect-fos

[6]  Robert Jay Lifton and Eric Markusen (1990), The Genocidal Mentality (Basic Books), p. 145.   Michael Glennon (2015), National Security and Double Government,   Marc Pilisuk and Jennifer Rountree (2008). Who Benefits from Global Violence and War?

More articles by:

Judith Deutsch is a member of the Socialist Project, Independent Jewish Voices, and  former president of Science for Peace. She is a psychoanalyst in Toronto. She can be reached at:   judithdeutsch0@gmail.com.

February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams
Thomas Knapp
The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC
Mitchel Cohen
A Tale of Two Citations: Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and Michael Harrington’s “The Other America”
Jake Johnston
Haiti and the Collapse of a Political and Economic System
Dave Lindorff
It’s Not Just Trump and the Republicans
Laura Flanders
An End to Amazon’s Two-Bit Romance. No Low-Rent Rendezvous.
Patrick Walker
Venezuelan Coup Democrats Vomit on Green New Deal
Natalie Dowzicky
The Millennial Generation Will Tear Down Trump’s Wall
Nick Licata
Of Stress and Inequality
Joseph G. Ramsey
Waking Up on President’s Day During the Reign of Donald Trump
Elliot Sperber
Greater Than Food
Weekend Edition
February 15, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Matthew Hoh
Time for Peace in Afghanistan and an End to the Lies
Chris Floyd
Pence and the Benjamins: An Eternity of Anti-Semitism
Rob Urie
The Green New Deal, Capitalism and the State
Jim Kavanagh
The Siege of Venezuela and the Travails of Empire
Paul Street
Someone Needs to Teach These As$#oles a Lesson
Andrew Levine
World Historical Donald: Unwitting and Unwilling Author of The Green New Deal
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Third Rail-Roaded
Eric Draitser
Impacts of Exploding US Oil Production on Climate and Foreign Policy
Ron Jacobs
Maduro, Guaidó and American Exceptionalism
John Laforge
Nuclear Power Can’t Survive, Much Less Slow Climate Disruption
Joyce Nelson
Venezuela & The Mighty Wurlitzer
Jonathan Cook
In Hebron, Israel Removes the Last Restraint on Its Settlers’ Reign of Terror
Ramzy Baroud
Enough Western Meddling and Interventions: Let the Venezuelan People Decide
Robert Fantina
Congress, Israel and the Politics of “Righteous Indignation”
Dave Lindorff
Using Students, Teachers, Journalists and other Professionals as Spies Puts Everyone in Jeopardy
Kathy Kelly
What it Really Takes to Secure Peace in Afghanistan
Brian Cloughley
In Libya, “We Came, We Saw, He Died.” Now, Maduro?
Nicky Reid
The Councils Before Maduro!
Gary Leupp
“It’s All About the Benjamins, Baby”