Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Deny Santa If You Wish, But You Can’t Deny This

Earlier this week a junior school in England was forced to apologize after a teacher used a worksheet with a class of ten year olds revealing that Santa Claus was a myth. The students had to make up replies from mail staff to children’s letters to Santa asking for presents, explaining why they couldn’t have them.

One parent said: “My wife and I made a special effort to keep the belief in Santa in our daughter’s mind. What gives the school the right to decide when children should know the truth, when knowing the truth does take away that little bit of magic?”

The headmistress of the school said the choice of worksheet had been a sad mistake and it would never be used again. “As a school we delight in the magic of childhood and believe that Christmas is a special time.”

The Hamilton Trust, which produced the worksheet, didn’t think it would come as much of a shock to children of that age, claiming that by the age of 10 children tend to know that Santa does not exist.

And yet millions of parents in the West persist in feeding the lie of Father Christmas to their innocent trusting children for as long as possible, until they realize they’re being punked, and maybe I shouldn’t trust mommy and daddy so much any more? It’s an accepted acceptable untruth. Santa deniers are killjoys and spoilsports, not to be listened to. They have the right to deny, of course. One wouldn’t dream of jailing them for simply stating their opinion. After all, aren’t we in the West entitled to freedom of speech and belief? You may not agree with me, but I have the right to say what I think — don’t I?

Denial of something more serious than Santa has been making news of late. A Holocaust Denial conference held last week in Iran, which called into question the systematic murder of six million European Jews by Nazi Germany, suggesting that the history of the genocide has been falsified to justify the foundation of Israel, was described by British Prime Minister Tony Blair as “shocking beyond belief”, and by the White House as “an affront to the entire civilized world.”

So what is this Holocaust denial, and why is it so bad? Isn’t it just like a Conspiracy Theory? Like, you can believe that the American government masterminded the 9/11 attacks on the twin towers in order to spark Armaggedon, and tell other people what you think, without fear of being arrested in the United States, where freedom of speech is protected in the first amendment. A lot of people might call you a crank. We want proof. Give us the evidence.

But if you’re living in Europe, and you suggest that some facts and figures were rigged in the historic presentation of the Second World War in order gain guilty sympathy for, and facilitate the exodus of European Jews to the then newly born state of Israel — you are likely to find yourself in prison for your views, cranky or no. You are guilty of the crime of ‘Holocaust denial’.

Apart from being a crime in Israel itself, Holocaust denial is a penal offence in Germany, France, Belgium, Switzerland and several other European countries, one of them being Austria, from where British historian David Irving was released this week, after having served 13 months of a three-year sentence in an Austrian prison for denying the Holocaust. Lord Janner, president of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said Mr. Irving’s release was “unwarranted”, and Lord Foulkes of the Labour Friends of Israel, said he should be watched closely by the police since his return to England.

So what do Holocaust deniers (who actually prefer to be known as ‘Holocaust revisionists’) actually say, that causes such offence? They don’t, of course, deny the death of a huge number of Jews, but they dispute the number, claiming the figure of 5-6 million is exaggerated, saying that many emigrated or escaped. They claim that gas chambers were not used to mass murder Jews, nor were cremation ovens used to dispose of millions of extermination victims. They say that most of the photos and film shown after the war were manufactured propaganda by the Allies against the Nazis; that Jews as a group were not in particular singled out from other persecuted people such as Romanies, gays or Communists, and that the Holocaust in general is nothing more than an elaborate Zionist hoax.

I’m sure there are many who hold stranger and uglier views, (and those who stir up antagonism on the basis of either race or religion should be accountable to the law), but like the ‘Conspiracy Theory’ it resembles, Holocaust denial should not be an imprisonable offence. I don’t like David Irving. He supported apartheid in South Africa, describes himself as ‘a mild fascist,’ but he should not have been jailed for his views. As Voltaire put it: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

There are many other examples of genocidal denials around the world. In Turkey for instance, it’s a crime to refuse to deny the alleged Armenian atrocity, and we have yet to hear an American President stand up and apologize for his white countrymen’s ancestors for extinguishing numberless tribes of indigenous people in the land they came to conquer which they named America.

Whether the Holocaust happened or not, there is no denying that people can be very cruel to other people, especially when they are in the position of power, now and in the past. The world is full of examples, everywhere. The Jews certainly suffered terribly under the Nazi regime, and those Jews in power now years later in their own State of Israel certainly seem to have learned a few tricks from their former overlords. The harsh conditions to which they subject the Palestinian people resembles the way the Jews themselves were treated under Hitler, putting thems into prison camp getthoes, creating an apartheid system, stealing their land, destroying their homes and fields, imprisoning thousands, and causing the deaths of countless innocent people and children in bombings and shellings, all of this is really “shocking beyond belief”, and “an affront to the entire civilized world.”

Deny Santa if you wish. You may even deny the Holocaust. It’s your right. But you can’t deny this affront. It’s happening now.

MICHAEL DICKINSON is an English teacher who lives and works in Istanbul.

 

 

 

More articles by:

Michael Dickinson can be contacted at michaelyabanji@gmail.com.

October 23, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
The Middle East, Not Russia, Will Prove Trump’s Downfall
Ipek S. Burnett
The Assault on The New Colossus: Trump’s Threat to Close the U.S.-Mexican Border
Mary Troy Johnston
The War on Terror is the Reign of Terror
Maximilian Werner
The Rhetoric and Reality of Death by Grizzly
David Macaray
Teamsters, Hells Angels, and Self-Determination
Jeffrey Sommers
“No People, Big Problem”: Democracy and Its Discontents In Latvia
Dean Baker
Looking for the Next Crisis: the Not Very Scary World of CLOs
Binoy Kampmark
Leaking for Change: ASIO, Jakarta, and Australia’s Jerusalem Problem
Chris Wright
The Necessity of “Lesser-Evil” Voting
Muhammad Othman
Daunting Challenge for Activists: The Cook Customer “Connection”
Don Fitz
A Debate for Auditor: What the Papers Wouldn’t Say
October 22, 2018
Henry Giroux
Neoliberalism in the Age of Pedagogical Terrorism
Melvin Goodman
Washington’s Latest Cold War Maneuver: Pulling Out of the INF
David Mattson
Basket of Deplorables Revisited: Grizzly Bears at the Mercy of Wyoming
Michelle Renee Matisons
Hurricane War Zone Further Immiserates Florida Panhandle, Panama City
Tom Gill
A Storm is Brewing in Europe: Italy and Its Public Finances Are at the Center of It
Suyapa Portillo Villeda
An Illegitimate, US-Backed Regime is Fueling the Honduran Refugee Crisis
Christopher Brauchli
The Liars’ Bench
Gary Leupp
Will Trump Split the World by Endorsing a Bold-Faced Lie?
Michael Howard
The New York Times’ Animal Cruelty Fetish
Alice Slater
Time Out for Nukes!
Geoff Dutton
Yes, Virginia, There are Conspiracies—I Think
Daniel Warner
Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question
Priti Gulati Cox – Stan Cox
Mothers of Exiles: For Many, the Child-Separation Ordeal May Never End
Manuel E. Yepe
Pence v. China: Cold War 2.0 May Have Just Begun
Raouf Halaby
Of Pith Helmets and Sartorial Colonialism
Dan Carey
Aspirational Goals  
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail