FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Bolton’s Battle With Government Censorship

Drawing by Nathaniel St. Clair

Former national security adviser John Bolton is about to learn that the government’s pre-publication review process is little more than a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech rights.  Bolton’s book, “The Room Where It Happened,” which exposes the perfidy of the Trump administration’s orchestrated extortion of the Ukrainian government, is scheduled for release in March 2020.  The book is already proving more damaging to Donald Trump than the 448-page Mueller report, and rivals the attention given to the CIA whistleblower’s account of Trump’s efforts to bribe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.  But there are indications that the government will demand the deletion of significant portions of the manuscript, and will do its best to delay publication as long as possible.

Having survived the review of numerous book-length manuscripts by the censors of the Central Intelligence Agency, I am in a position to offer Mr. Bolton several warnings and even a suggestion.  First of all, the pre-publication review process is arbitrary and capricious.  Manuscripts that offer praise of a government agency, particularly one in the intelligence community, get a cursory review that rarely takes more than a week or two.  Former CIA directors Robert Gates and Leon Panetta, for example, suffered no changes in their manuscripts, and Panetta didn’t even bother to submit his manuscript until the book was scheduled for delivery to book stores.  Former CIA director Stansfield Turner was allowed to discuss the overseas activities of CIA station chiefs; I was told my discussion compromised essential security issues.

Critics of an agency, however, are subjected to extensive delays that can last more than one year.  My book on whistleblowing at the CIA to call attention to the politicization of intelligence and to stop the confirmation of Gates as CIA director was held up for eleven months.  The book contained no classified information, and I had left the CIA nearly three decades before the manuscript was submitted for review.  One of the redactions concerned a footnote that carried the title of an article from the New York Timesthat the the CIA censor said was classified.  The title was classified, according to the CIA, because it mentioned CIA secret prisons that resorted to torture and abuse.  Hardly a secret!

Other redactions concerned CIA drones in Southwest Asia that the CIA considers classified.  The fact that CIA drone activity is regularly reported in the news media and that former president Barack Obama discussed it in public speeches meant nothing to the CIA reviewers.

Bolton will learn that the White House censors are not required to offer any explanation for their demands for redaction of certain items.  Moreover, Bolton will have no real opportunity to discuss the changes that are demanded.  And even if he were to pursue legal action, Bolton will quickly learn that the courts are biased in favor of the government in virtually all national security cases.

Bolton will also learn that government censors are not as interested in the publication of genuine national security secrets, which are leaked by government officials to favored journalists on a regular basis, but are really trying to stop information that would be embarrassing to an agency or its director or to the president of the United States.

In other words, the pre-publication review system throughout the government is in fact a secret system to censor legitimate information that should be in the hands of congressional committees, news organizations, and particularly the larger public.  Justice Sonia Sotomayor opined in 2014 that the speech of public employees “holds special value precisely because these employees gain knowledge of matters of public concern through their employment.”

The Congress demanded several years ago that the government, particularly the intelligence community, reform the pre-publication review system to allow for judicial review of redactions; to establish enforceable deadlines; and to create clear censorship standards.  I am currently involved in a case before the federal court in Maryland in order to end the government’s censorship and use of prior restraint against former federal employees.  The case is being argued by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.  I invite Mr. Bolton to join our small group of plaintiffs.

More articles by:

Melvin A. Goodman is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and a professor of government at Johns Hopkins University.  A former CIA analyst, Goodman is the author of Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA and National Insecurity: The Cost of American Militarism. and A Whistleblower at the CIA. His most recent book is “American Carnage: The Wars of Donald Trump” (Opus Publishing), and he is the author of the forthcoming “The Dangerous National Security State” (2020).” Goodman is the national security columnist for counterpunch.org.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
April 03, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Omar Shaban
Gaza’s New Conflict: COVID-19
Rob Urie
Work, Crisis and Pandemic
John Whitlow
Slumlord Capitalism v. Global Pandemic
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Strange Things Happening Every Day
Jonathan Cook
The Bigger Picture is Hiding Behind a Virus
Paul Street
Silver Linings Amidst the Capitalist Coronavirus Crisis
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Control of Nature
Louis Proyect
COVID-19 and the “Just-in-Time” Supply Chain: Why Hospitals Ran Out of Ventilators and Grocery Stores Ran Out of Toilet Paper
Kathleen Wallace
The Highly Contagious Idea
Kenneth Good
The Apartheid Wars: Non-Accountability and Freedom for Perpetrators.
Andrew Levine
Democracy in America: Sorry, But You Can’t Get There from Here.
Ramzy Baroud
Tunisia Leads the Way: New Report Exposes Israel’s False Democracy
David Rosen
Coronavirus and the State-of-Emergency Pandemic
Matthew Stevenson
Will Trump Cancel the Election? Will the Democrats Dump Joe?
Ron Jacobs
Seattle—Anti-Capitalist Hotbed
Michael T. Klare
Avenger Planet: Is the COVID-19 Pandemic Mother Nature’s Response to Human Transgression?
Jack Rasmus
COVID-19 and the Forgotten Working Class
Werner Lange
The Madness of More Nukes and Less Rights in Pandemic Times
J.P. Linstroth
Why a Race is Not a Virus and a Virus is Not a Race
John Feffer
We Need a Coronavirus Truce
Thomas S. Harrington
“New Corona Cases”: the Ultimate Floating Signifier
Victor Grossman
Corona and What Then?
Katie Fite
Permanent Pandemic on Public Lands: Welfare Sheep Ranchers and Their Enablers Hold the West’s Bighorns Hostage
Patrick Bond
Covid-19 Attacks the Down-and-Out in Ultra-Unequal South Africa
Eve Ottenberg
Capitalism vs. Humanity
Nicky Reid
Fear and Loathing in Coronaville Volume 2: Panic On the Streets of Tehran
Jonas Ecke
Would Dying for the Economy Help Anybody?
Jeff Mackler
Capitalism is the Virus!
Andrew Moss
Incarceration, Detention, and Covid-19
Farzana Versey
Prayers, Piffle and Privation in the Time of Pandemic
Will Solomon
In the New Dystopia
Dean Baker
The Relative Generosity of the Economic Rescue Package: Boeing vs. Public Broadcasting
Dr. Leo Lopez, III
We Need a Lot More Transparency From the CDC
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Reflections on a Glass of Homemade Cider
Rashid Nuri
Homegrown Crisis Response: Who Grows Your Food?
Mark Luskus
Worst Case Scenario: Healthcare Workers Need Masks, ASAP
Volker Franke
The Virus That May Bring us Together
Mitchell Zimmerman
A Q & A on the GOP’s Call for Elder Sacrifice
Olfat al-Kurd
COVID-19 Could Be Catastrophic for Us: Notes From Gaza
Eileen Appelbaum - Roesmary Batt
Hospital Bailouts Begin…for Those Owned by Private Equity Firms
Nabri Ginwa
Carcinogens
Jill Richardson
Efficiency vs. Resilience
Lee Ballinger
Eddie Van Halen and the Future of Humanity
David Yearsley
Beset by Bach
Robert Koehler
Developing a Vaccine Against War
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail