FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Chance of a Military Draft in the US? Less Than Zero!

Wouldn’t it be the height of hypocrisy if Mr. Bone Spur approved a military draft (with the help of Congress)? The fact that the Selective Service website crashed following the drone assassination of Iranian General Suleimani (“US government agency website crashes amid panic over military draft,” Guardian, January 4, 2020), and will lead to a draft, is the stuff of pure imagination. The repercussions will not be comical, however, since the insatiable appetite for profit in the war industry and the expansion of empire is nothing but dangerous and ugly. Since September 11, 2001, and the democracy movements in some countries in the Middle East and in some countries in Africa, the drumbeat and horror of endless wars has been deafening for those who care about these issues and are willing to listen.

The military seems to be getting all the members it needs because good jobs are not available for lots of people from the first 20 percent of income distribution (labelled as the fifth quintile), an economic class that includes many people of color.

Here in the US, the reporting from the war zones where endless wars have been fought for nearly two decades is almost nonexistent, and that keeps any real scrutiny of US wars out of the media and far away from personal and national consciousness. It isn’t like the early days of the War on Terror when most embedded reporters became part of the campaign to glorify war. News from war zones hardly makes it to the front pages of major newspapers, or within the endless babble and chatter of television and Internet media.

Try to imagine the response of male middle-class young adults if a draft was voted in by Congress. The streets would explode. Even Nixon the consummate warmonger knew this in 1973, when he ended the military draft and created the volunteer military. There haven’t been many times since that the draft was even a remote possibility for the middle class. The prospects of a draft seemed possible during the Iranian hostage crisis of 1979-1981, but that quickly evaporated with Reagan. Even as the US expanded the volunteer military when the war in Afghanistan morphed into another war in Iraq, the military began to issue waivers that allowed for the acceptance of some who had committed crimes and some with limited intellectual ability. Since then, economics has done the job of bringing in the needed troops.

There have always been those who joined the military for reasons they identify as patriotic and an elite corps of officers trained at military academies and colleges, but the rank and file of volunteers come from the lowest 20 percent slice of the economic pie.

Women, now accepted in all military specialties, would automatically be exempted from a draft, although it is likely that some feminists and feminist organizations would demand equal treatment if a draft was implemented.

Being in harm’s way or subject to a military draft is something that most who have come of age following the Vietnam War era can’t even imagine. The government wants to keep it that way. Even with reduced fatalities and injuries from battle today, with massive military might and war sometimes waged from the skies, both from drones and from piloted aircraft, the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq produced many horrific injuries, especially at the onset of the war in Afghanistan, with troops going into battle and on missions where they were subjected to attack by improvised explosives that ripped apart the poorly shielded vehicles in which they rode. Those kinds of horrific injuries would drive potential draftees into the streets because few want to even remotely have their own skin in the “game.” Even fewer want the horrific psychological injuries that war creates.

Here’s a quote from a professor at Rutgers University:

I don’t know what it means in a democracy that you let some people fight your wars and everybody is not responsible,” she said. “American citizens are not implicated in the consequences — bodily human life, economically — of war, and they should be. (“Will There Be a Draft? Young People Worry After Military Strike,” New York Times, January 3, 2020).

Well, first we’d need a just cause, then a just war, and finally a democracy. We have none of those here! What we do have is the thread that holds the potential of a nuclear holocaust that could be unleashed in an environment of endless war and incompetent leaders.

More articles by:

Howard Lisnoff is a freelance writer. He is the author of Against the Wall: Memoir of a Vietnam-Era War Resister (2017).

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
February 26, 2020
Matthew Hoh
Heaven Protect Us From Men Who Live the Illusion of Danger: Pete Buttigieg and the US Military
Jefferson Morley
How the US Intelligence Community is Interfering in the 2020 Elections
Patrick Cockburn
With Wikileaks, Julian Assange Did What All Journalists Should Do
Manuel García, Jr.
Climate Change and Voting 2020
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Russiagate: The Toxic Gift That Keeps on Giving
Andrew Bacevich
Going Off-Script in the Age of Trump
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Anti-Russian Xenophobia Reaches Ridiculous Levels
Ted Rall
Don’t Worry, Centrists. Bernie Isn’t Radical.
George Wuerthner
Whatever Happened to the Greater Yellowstone Coalition?
Scott Tucker
Democratic Socialism in the Twenty-First Century
Jonah Raskin
The Call of the Wild (2020): A Cinematic Fairy Tale for the Age of Environmental Disaster
George Ochenski
Why We Shouldn’t Run Government Like a Business
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Imperium’s Face: Day One of the Extradition Hearings
Nozomi Hayase
Assange’s Extradition Hearing Reveals Trump’s War on Free Press Is Targeting WikiLeaks Publisher
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon? (Part Two)
Max Moran
Meet Brad Karp, the Top Lawyer Bankrolling the Democrats
David Swanson
Nonviolent Action for Peace
Ed Sanders
The Ex-Terr GooGoo Eyes “The Russkies Did it!” Plot
February 25, 2020
Michael Hudson
The Democrats’ Quandary: In a Struggle Between Oligarchy and Democracy, Something Must Give
Paul Street
The “Liberal” Media’s Propaganda War on Bernie Sanders
Sheldon Richman
The Non-Intervention Principle
Nicholas Levis
The Real Meaning of Red Scare 3.0
John Feffer
Cleaning Up Trump’s Global Mess
David Swanson
How Are We Going to Pay for Saving Trillions of Dollars?
Ralph Nader
Three Major News Stories That Need To Be Exposed
John Eskow
What Will You Do If the Democrats Steal It from Sanders?
Dean Baker
What If Buttigieg Said That He Doesn’t Accept the “Fashionable” View That Climate Change is a Problem?
Jack Rasmus
The Nevada Caucus and the Desperation of Democrat Elites
Howard Lisnoff
The Powerful Are Going After Jane Fonda Again
Binoy Kampmark
Viral Losses: Australian Universities, Coronavirus and Greed
John W. Whitehead
Gun-Toting Cops Endanger Students and Turn Schools into Prisons
Marshall Sahlins
David Brooks, Public Intellectual
February 24, 2020
Stephen Corry
New Deal for Nature: Paying the Emperor to Fence the Wind
M. K. Bhadrakumar
How India’s Modi is Playing on Trump’s Ego to His Advantage
Jennifer Matsui
Tycoon Battle-Bots Battle Bernie
Robert Fisk
There’s Little Chance for Change in Lebanon, Except for More Suffering
Rob Wallace
Connecting the Coronavirus to Agriculture
Bill Spence
Burning the Future: the Growing Anger of Young Australians
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Binoy Kampmark
The Priorities of General Motors: Ditching Holden
George Wuerthner
Trojan Horse Timber Sales on the Bitterroot
Rick Meis
Public Lands “Collaboration” is Lousy Management
David Swanson
Bloomberg Has Spent Enough to Give a Nickel to Every Person Whose Life He’s Ever Damaged
Peter Cohen
What Tomorrow May Bring: Politics of the People
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon?
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail