FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

U.S. Political Class Looks Away as Cuba Details Impact of U.S. Blockade

Politicians whose job is to save crisis-ridden U.S. capitalism steer clear of wealth distribution; therefore, they won’t be solving the climate – change problem or fixing inequalities in health care, education, and housing.  They exalt the U. S. military as a profit-center and a brake on rival power centers. And they beat up on a Cuba working on a better way.

Voices of those desperate for solutions are barely heard in mainstream circles now.  Circus-like distraction prevails, put in play by a skilled performer in a theater of the absurd masked as a presidency. Adept with venom, lies, and bullying, he monopolizes attention.

Meanwhile, projects of the extreme rightwing advance via executive actions and President Trump’s opponents lack focus on solving big problems. U. S. maltreatment of Cuba, perceived as a lesser one, must inhabit the back region of their consciousness.

Now, information is recently available concerning the U.S. economic blockade of Cuba, particularly the toll it exacts in money and suffering. In different circumstance the story of terrible abuse of the Cuban people might rank as a big issue. Actually, when the circus leaves town and if struggle for decent relations with Cuba comes into its own, sure knowledge about a dreadful impact will be an essential tool.

Cuba made facts and data available ahead of November 1, 2017, the day when the United Nations General Assembly, for the 26th consecutive year, will vote on a Cuban resolution calling for an end to the U. S. blockade. Before the vote, Cuba’s foreign ministry invariably issues a report detailing the blockade’s adverse effects. Now there is a trail of documents testifying to these realities.

In truth, Cuba generates these annual reports less to persuade members of the Assembly than to use the occasion for informing world opinion about the blockade. Cuba by now can be confident about how the vote will go. The General Assembly has always approved Cuba’s resolution overwhelmingly.  Last year all nations voted Yes, except for the United States and Israel, who abstained.

All 47 pages of the 2017 report are accessible here. It begins: “The economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the Government of the United States against Cuba for almost 60 years still persists, continues to cause suffering to the Cuban people, and obstructs the economic development of the country.” This report centers on Cuba’s experience between April 2016 and June 2017.

According to the report, Cuba’s “situation began to worsen” under the Obama administration, despite diplomatic relations with Cuba having been restored. The U. S. Treasury Department imposed frequent fines “on foreign companies that maintained commercial relations with Cuba.” Fearing sanctions, many international financial institutions opted to not engage with Cuba. The Treasury Department finally in early 2016 allowed Cuba to use dollars in international transactions, but implementation was lacking.

According to Cuba’s calculations, the blockade over the decades has caused Cuba to lose $822.2 billion, figured in terms of devaluated dollars, or $130.2 billion, expressed as their current value. Since April 16, 2016, the blockade has cost Cuba $4.3 billion. These totals represent extra costs associated with obtaining goods in places other than the United States, income lost due to the unavailability of U.S. goods and supplies, and earnings unrealized due to the U. S. ban on imports from Cuba.  That these losses exceed the billions of dollars Cuba receives as direct foreign investment suggests the extent to which financial drain jeopardizes Cuba’s economic development.

President Obama’s reforms had their limitations. State enterprises were still barred from exporting to and importing from the United States. New allowances for tele-communications equipment represented only a tiny exception. U. S. travel still faced rstrictions.  Cuban financial entities were still unable to open accounts in U. S. banks. Cargo ships visiting Cuban ports still faced a six-month long ban on docking in a U. S. port.

The report cites 18 “main blockade measures” imposed since May 2016. Here’s an example: “On June 8, 2017, [the U. S. Treasury Department] imposed a 87,255 dollar fine on the company American Honda Finance Corporation (AHFC) because one of its subsidiaries in Canada – Honda Canada Finance Inc. – approved and financed 13 vehicle leasing agreements between the Cuban embassy in Canada and a concessionary of Honda in Ottawa between February of 2011 and March of 2014.”

The report documented eight instances of U.S. interference with the “Right to Health and Food.” For example, “Cuban hospitals cannot have any state-of-the-art technology or equipment that is exclusively manufactured in the United States …Cuba [therefore] had to send a group of patients and their companions to foreign hospitals, at a cost of 1,066,600 dollars.” Unable to import drugs and medical equipment from the United States, Cuba must find them in third countries. That obligation entails marked-up prices and extra charges for insurance, freight, storage, and payments to intermediaries.  Extra spending on health – care, due to the blockade, amounted to $87 million during one year.

In the same year, Cuba’s food sector lost almost $348 million. Cuban food manufactures import 70 percent of the equipment and raw materials they need.  Having to rely on distant sources adds expense and requires Cuba to have large inventories on hand.

Importation of education supplies from countries other than the United States adds almost $3 million to Cuba’s costs. The blockade still hinders educational exchanges, deprives schools and universities of U. S. – licensed computer software, and causes shortages of laboratory equipment. Much equipment needed for Cuba’s sports, cultural, and artistic programs is also obtainable only in third countries – at great cost – and often is unavailable.

The report provides dozens of examples of impediments to Cuba’s development. New equipment for refashioning the island’s water system in the face of severe drought is usually off limits. Cuba’s large biomedical industry must cope with shortages of materials and equipment. Cuba’s mining, chemical, alternative energy, telecommunications, metallurgy, construction, and aviation industries lack access to U.S. sources of new or replacement equipment. They have to look elsewhere, and pay more.

Cuba’s relations with third – country banks and corporations went awry long ago. The report emphasizes that the “blockade is not a bilateral issue between the United States and Cuba. Its extraterritorial character persists and is fully implemented, with absolute impunity and in open violation of International Law.”

Interconnections pervade today’s global economy. Many U.S. corporations are multi-national in scope and have banking relationships throughout the world. These are circumstances calling the blockade into play, especially when a foreign subsidiary serves Cuban needs.

The report offers dozens of examples of interventions such as foreign banks being sanctioned for handling Cuba-related transactions, or Cubans not receiving pay for what they do overseas or goods they provide, or Cuban bio-medical products being unavailable to U.S. hospitals and physicians.

The authors are clear: “The blockade continues to be a massive, flagrant and systematic violation of the human rights of all Cubans and qualifies as an act of genocide.” Furthermore, “The economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the Government of the United States against Cuba is being tightened.”  And, “This policy continues to be the only obstacle to the development of the Cuban economy.”

In contrast with previous reports, this one doesn’t speak much of national sovereignty or of international law. It does hint at the Geneva Conventions, which say that combatants in a war must assure that non-combatants survive, especially civilians. But the U. S. government, not even waging war with Cuba, purposefully has visited great harm upon Cuban civilians.

More articles by:

W.T. Whitney Jr. is a retired pediatrician and political journalist living in Maine.

Weekend Edition
July 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Atwood
Peace or Armageddon: Take Your Pick
Paul Street
No Liberal Rallies Yet for the Children of Yemen
Nick Pemberton
The Bipartisan War on Central and South American Women
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Are You Putin Me On?
Andrew Levine
Sovereignty: What Is It Good For? 
Brian Cloughley
The Trump/NATO Debacle and the Profit Motive
David Rosen
Trump’s Supreme Pick Escalates America’s War on Sex 
Melvin Goodman
Montenegro and the “Manchurian Candidate”
Salvador Rangel
“These Are Not Our Kids”: The Racial Capitalism of Caging Children at the Border
Matthew Stevenson
Going Home Again to Trump’s America
Louis Proyect
Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders and the Dilemmas of the Left
Patrick Cockburn
Iraqi Protests: “Bad Government, Bad Roads, Bad Weather, Bad People”
Robert Fantina
Has It Really Come to This?
Russell Mokhiber
Kristin Lawless on the Corporate Takeover of the American Kitchen
John W. Whitehead
It’s All Fake: Reality TV That Masquerades as American Politics
Patrick Bobilin
In Your Period Piece, I Would be the Help
Ramzy Baroud
The Massacre of Inn Din: How Rohingya Are Lynched and Held Responsible
Robert Fisk
How Weapons Made in Bosnia Fueled Syria’s Bleak Civil War
Gary Leupp
Trump’s Helsinki Press Conference and Public Disgrace
Josh Hoxie
Our Missing $10 Trillion
Martha Rosenberg
Pharma “Screening” Is a Ploy to Seize More Patients
Basav Sen
Brett Kavanaugh Would be a Disaster for the Climate
David Lau
The Origins of Local AFT 4400: a Profile of Julie Olsen Edwards
Rohullah Naderi
The Elusive Pursuit of Peace by Afghanistan
Binoy Kampmark
Shaking Establishments: The Ocasio-Cortez Effect
John Laforge
18 Protesters Cut Into German Air Base to Protest US Nuclear Weapons Deployment
Christopher Brauchli
Trump and the Swedish Question
Chia-Chia Wang
Local Police Shouldn’t Collaborate With ICE
Paul Lyons
YouTube’s Content ID – A Case Study
Jill Richardson
Soon You Won’t be Able to Use Food Stamps at Farmers’ Markets, But That’s Not the Half of It
Kevin MacKay
Climate Change is Proving Worse Than We Imagined, So Why Aren’t We Confronting its Root Cause?
Thomas Knapp
Elections: More than Half of Americans Believe Fairy Tales are Real
Ralph Nader
Warner Slack—Doctor for the People Forever
Lee Ballinger
Soccer, Baseball and Immigration
Louis Yako
Celebrating the Wounds of Exile with Poetry
Ron Jacobs
Working Class Fiction—Not Just Surplus Value
Perry Hoberman
You Can’t Vote Out Fascism… You Have to Drive It From Power!
Robert Koehler
Guns and Racism, on the Rocks
Nyla Ali Khan
Kashmir: Implementation with Integrity and Will to Resolve
Justin Anderson
Elon Musk vs. the Media
Graham Peebles
A Time of Hope for Ethiopia
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Homophobia in the Service of Anti-Trumpism is Still Homophobic (Even When it’s the New York Times)
Martin Billheimer
Childhood, Ferocious Sleep
David Yearsley
The Glories of the Grammophone
Tom Clark
Gameplanning the Patriotic Retributive Attack on Montenegro
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail