The Photo That Went Round the World
Around 3:30 am Sept 2, Aylan Kurdi, his brother, mother and nine others drowned trying to reach a Greek island from Bodrum Turkey.
Around 6 am that morning, the staff photographer from Dogan News Agency came upon Aylan’s body on the beach, and took the famous photograph.
In a few hours it was published online and ‘went viral’ on Turkish then English language social media. Washington Post Beirut chief Liz Sly posted the photo with comment that Aylan’s death is “emblematic of world’s failure in Syria”. Minutes later, Nadim Houry of Human Rights Watch (HRW) posted the photo with comment that it’s an “indictment of collective failure”.
Media worldwide began featuring video and stories showing refugees traveling by land in Europe. The crisis that burst into view on Sept 2 has been building for years. But can the raised consciousness address the root cause of the crisis?
Countries Accepting More Refugees
The Media and numerous organizations have shone a bright light on the refugee crisis. North European countries with low birth rates and aging populations are accepting more refugees. Germany will reportedly accept 800,000 over the next year. Many other countries including the USA are promising to accept more refugees from Syria. This is welcome news. However it’s not a solution because:
* Syrian refugees accepted in Europe or the west are a small part of the total need. There are four million Syrian refugees living in bordering countries and another 7 to 8 million displaced Syrians living in government controlled areas within Syria.
* Permitting more Syrians to emigrate addresses a symptom but not the root cause. Most Syrians do not want to emigrate to Europe or elsewhere. A Syrian boy trying to reach Europe said “Stop the war in Syria then we won’t want to go to Europe.”
Most Syrians just want the war in their country to stop. Two days after his children and wife drowned, on his way back to his hometown of Kobane Syria, the father of Aylan Kurdi said simply “All I want is peace in Syria”.
But the forces driving the war are not changing their approach.
Hostile Governments Continue to Demand “Regime Change”
Since Aylan’s death, the countries waging war on Syria through proxy armies continue to demand change in government and/or direct intervention through the sweet sounding name “secure zone”.
* On Sept 4, Turkish Prime Minister Davutoglu said “ I have been trying…to persuade world leaders for the need of the establishment of a secure zone inside Syria. … There are developments just like the ones occurred in Srebrenica if secure zones are not established.” His comparison to Srebrenica hints at the beginning of potential NATO bombing and is ironic since Srebrenica had been declared a “safe zone” years before the city became a symbol of death and war.
* On Sept 9, UK Prime Minister Cameron confirmed the UK goals for Syria: “Assad has to go, Isil has to go and some of that will require not just spending money, not just aid, not just diplomacy, but it will on occasion require hard military force.”
* On Sept 14, US Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition against ISIL, General John Allen said to the BBC: “We have envisaged from the beginning that this was going to be a long term struggle…. It’s not just about dealing with Daesh. It’s about dealing with the conditions that created them. Bashar al Assad has got to go. He is both a point and representation of what has caused so much instability in the region.”
General Allen talks easily about “long term struggle” while Syrians have their country attacked by foreign funded mercenaries and fanatics. The total population of Syria is less than 10% the population of the USA yet more Syrian soldiers have died defending their country than all the US soldiers killed in Vietnam. What would he think if the USA was being invaded by tens of thousands of heavily armed and financed terrorists streaming across the Canadian and Mexican borders?
Western NGOs Continue to Campaign for Intervention
There are many “non governmental organizations” (NGOs) working on Syria. The “White Helmets” is such an organization, created by the US and UK with training in Turkey. They claim to be “neutral” but are not. They posted an illustration of Aylan Kurdi linking to an article calling for an “aerial bombardment free zone” in southern Syria. They effectively used Aylan’s death to promote a USA or NATO enforced No Fly Zone.
On Sept 3, HRW Director Ken Roth wrote an editorial suggesting “the biggest thing Europe could do to slow the refugee flow: stop Assad’s barrel bombing civilians”. Roth ignores the support of proxy armies by the USA and allies; he ignores or trivializes the sectarian and fanatic ideology of the armed opposition.
According to his analysis the core problem is Assad government attacks on civilians. In reality:
* There are few civilians in the areas controlled by the violent opposition. In the recent Syrian government attack on the violent opposition in Douma, for example, it is claimed the attack was on civilians in a vegetable market place. As shown in this investigation, the fatalities were almost all young fighting age males, a curious demographic for a vegetable market.
* “Barrel Bombs” are just home-made bombs of less cost and power, especially compared with US manufactured bombs supplied to Saudi Arabia and Israel.
* These bombs fall to earth by gravity so people on the ground can avoid them more easily than guided bombs. People on the ground can monitor overhead aircraft and find shelter if there is risk of falling “barrel bomb”.
The characterization of the Syria conflict by western NGOs and neocons is simple: the problem is the evil Assad. Although it is true the Syrian government needs reform, laying blame for the Syrian war at its feet is simplistic and inaccurate. By demonizing the Syrian government HRW is undermining the chance for compromise and negotiation. Shouldn’t they be working for a Syrian resolution of the conflict rather than promoting more foreign intervention and prolonging the war?
Situation in Turkey Becoming Increasingly Tense
The death of Aylan Kurdi highlighted the desperate situation of refugees in Turkey. Many believe Turkey has recently been “looking the other way” as refugees take the risky departure trip. The Turkish government may be trying to get rid of the refugees and pressure Europe to commit more resources to the war against Syria.
Meanwhile the Justice and Development Party (AKP), closely allied with the Muslim Brotherhood, lost its parliamentary majority in the June election. Unwilling to form a coalition government, they have forced a second election to take place November 1. The stakes and tensions inside Turkey are high and rising. President Erdogan seems to be going for broke and provoking tensions, nationalism and conflict with the opposition. On July 20 in the Turkish town of Suruc, across the border from Kobane Syria, thirty-two Turkish Kurdish youth were killed in a bombing. The Kurdish Workers Party PKK claims that Turkish intelligence was behind the bombing. The accusation is credible since there is strong evidence of Turkish intelligence support for Nusra, ISIS and other terror groups operating in Syria. In addition, Turkish intelligence is suspected of being behind the death of American Lebanese journalist Serena Shim, also in Suruc. Shim had exposed Turkey’s pivotal role in the war on Syria. The bombing that killed 32, coupled with Turkish air attacks against PKK in northern Iraq, has dramatically ended the Turkish “peace process”.
In recent weeks the AKP government has been threatening media. Gangs have attacked offices of the Progressive Peoples Party and the offices of Hurriyet media. This week a prosecutor charged Dogan news agency (Hurriyet Daily) with “terror propaganda”.
Bloodshed and Attacks in Syria Continue
The war inside Syria grinds on. In the past two weeks:
* car bombs have gone off in Latakia
* the “Army of Conquest” (Nusra/Al Queda, Arar al Sham, Chinese Uighur etc) over-ran the Abu Duhour Air Base and killed about 100 Syrian soldiers.
* the Syrian Army beat back a large ISIS attack on the important air base in Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria.
Living conditions inside Syria are difficult in many areas, with rationing of electricity and running water. Some Syrians have grown tired of waiting for peace and decided to flee for a chance at security and a better life. Others bravely or stoically continue to make the best of the difficult situation.
The BBC war reporter Jeremy Bowen recently expressed high respect for the Syrian Army. “ I have seen quite a lot of armies in the field over the years… This army has the will to fight on; they are a cohesive unit; these positions are well managed, well run … The soldiers are disciplined and have a good spirit. They do not look like a beaten army. I think those people who are predicting the fall of the Assad regime are again guilty of wishful thinking.”
Why is This Called a “Civil War”?
The war in Syria is intense and bloody. The death toll is huge. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which supports the opposition, recently produced a graph showing casualties over the past year and half. As can been seen, the largest number of fatalities are foreign fighters. Why is this called a “civil war”?
Foreign Intervention is the Problem Not the Solution
Many people are shocked at the images of Aylan Kurdi or thousands of refugees struggling to reach safety somewhere. Some say “We have to do something!” The reality is that US and allies have been “doing something” in Syria since 2011. The USA & NATO countries plus wealthy Gulf states and others have been funding, training, providing weapons and salaries for tens of thousands of mercenaries and fanatics to attack Syria. This is a clear violation of customary international law and the UN Charter.
A solution to the Syrian refugee crisis is possible. It would involve outside powers giving up their demand for ‘regime change’ and stopping their support, training and funding of violent opposition groups. There could be an internationally enforced agreement with guarantees for the right to peacefully protest and elections. What is needed is to stop the violence and allow for the start of reconciliation and rebuilding without preconditions.
Is that possible? Are the USA, Gulf monarchies and NATO so stubbornly committed to their regime change agenda for Syria that they will inflict hundreds of thousands more deaths and further destruction on the cradle of civilization?
Meanwhile the tragedy continues. Twenty-two refugees drowned yesterday trying to reach Greece from Turkey.
What has changed since little Aylan drowned? Many more people are aware of a refugee problem. Some countries are taking in more refugees. But the root cause has not been addressed. The war of aggression against Syria continues.
