FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Montana Ballot Access Decision Suppresses Green Party Voters

In 1969, the U.S. Supreme Court held that unequal distribution requirements for statewide petitions violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Again in 1970, citing the 1969 Illinois case, the SCOTUS struck down New York’s distribution requirements. Distribution requirements give voters in some geographical areas more power than voters residing in other areas in blatant disregard for a bedrock democratic principle: “one person, one vote.”

On March 20, U.S. District Court Judge Brian Morris, an Obama lifetime appointee, upheld the Montana distribution law, in Montana Green Party v. Stapleton, 6:18cv-87. The Montana law applies only to ballot-access petitions for a new party, not independent candidate petitions. It requires signatures from 34 state House voting districts, but the number varies from district to district. In some districts as few as 55 signatures qualify, while in others 150 are needed. The number is determined by 5% of the winning candidate’s total in the last election, which creates an unequal requirement due to varying popularity of the winning candidate in each voting district. The greater the vote total, the signature requirement rises accordingly.

The Court has no higher duty than protecting the constitutional rights of individual voters. The Court’s deeply flawed decision has failed miserably to represent the interests of Montana’s individual electors – especially those 10,000-plus registered voters who in good faith signed the 2018 Green Party ballot-access petition.

Montana is the last state with unequal distribution requirements for a new minor party or independent candidate petitions. The 2018 Green Party petition did not fail for lack of the necessary (5,000 registered voters) signatures, but because it didn’t meet the distribution requirement.

Judge Morris cited two cases (Colorado and Missouri) in support of his Opinion, however, neither case involve unequal distribution requirements. Both states treat all voting districts the same. He failed to discuss the fifteen precedent cases from states that struck down unequal distribution requirements. See: Constitution Party of Pennsylvania v. Cortes, 877 F.3rd 480 (3rd cir. 2017, p. 491). Nor did he mention the 2002 9th Circuit case that struck down Idaho’s unequal distribution requirement for initiatives. Idaho is in the 9th Circuit which means that Judge Morris should have based his decision on the Idaho precedent. Moreover, in 2005, Montana’s own unequal distribution requirement for initiatives was struck down in Montana PIRG v. Johnson, 361 F.Supp.2d 1222.

The 2018 Green Party case exemplifies the rapid erosion of the fundamental principles of free and fair elections. Democrats have long accused Republicans of underhanded voter suppression tactics. This case shows that Democrats and once-impartial judges that favor Democrats engage in the same unethical behavior. Judge Brian Morris has issued numerous well-reasoned opinions in previous election law cases. His ruling in the Green Party case signals to other judges who favor the Democratic Party over the Republican Party that it’s okay to engage in unscrupulous partisan behavior, as long as it helps to keep the Green Party off the general election ballot.

When more judges and election administrators feel more comfortable putting party above the integrity of the electoral process and the constitutional rights of individual electors, we’re sliding down that slippery slope. If political corruption is the norm, elections rapidly lose meaning. Reasonable individual electors have no logical reason to participate in meaningless elections.

Democrats have worked hard to dis-enfranchise thousands of registered Montana voters simply because they supported the Montana Green Party’s ballot-access drive. Democrats pose a serious and growing threat to the citizen-petition process. How ironic, a major party named “Democratic” without a shred of democratic principle in evidence. The integrity of Montana’s election system is in jeopardy. If the federal court system allows this type of blatant discrimination to expand, Montana’s “free and fair” elections process is dead and buried. RIP.

More articles by:

Steve Kelly is a an artist and serves as a member of the board of directors of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies. He lives in Bozeman, Montana.  

Weekend Edition
August 14, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Matthew Hoh
Lights! Camera! Kill! Hollywood, the Pentagon and Imperial Ambitions.
Joseph Grosso
Bloody Chicken: Inside the American Poultry Industry During the Time of COVID
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: It Had to be You
H. Bruce Franklin
August 12-22, 1945: Washington Starts the Korean and Vietnam Wars
Pete Dolack
Business as Usual Equals Many Extra Deaths from Global Warming
Paul Street
Whispers in the Asylum (Seven Days in August)
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Predatory Capitalism and the Nuclear Threat in the Age of Trump
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
‘Magical Thinking’ has Always Guided the US Role in Afghanistan
Ramzy Baroud
The Politics of War: What is Israel’s Endgame in Lebanon and Syria?
Ron Jacobs
It’s a Sick Country
Eve Ottenberg
Trump’s Plan: Gut Social Security, Bankrupt the States
Richard C. Gross
Trump’s Fake News
Jonathan Cook
How the Guardian Betrayed Not Only Corbyn But the Last Vestiges of British Democracy
Joseph Natoli
What Trump and the Republican Party Teach Us
Robert Fisk
Can Lebanon be Saved?
Brian Cloughley
Will Biden be Less Belligerent Than Trump?
Kenn Orphan
We Do Not Live in the World of Before
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Compromise & the Status Quo
Andrew Bacevich
Biden Wins, Then What?
Thomas Klikauer – Nadine Campbell
The Criminology of Global Warming
Michael Welton
Toppled Monuments and the Struggle For Symbolic Space
Prabir Purkayastha
Why 5G is the First Stage of a Tech War Between the U.S. and China
Daniel Beaumont
The Reign of Error
Adrian Treves – John Laundré
Science Does Not Support the Claims About Grizzly Hunting, Lethal Removal
David Rosen
A Moment of Social Crisis: Recalling the 1970s
Maximilian Werner
Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf: Textual Manipulations in Anti-wolf Rhetoric
Pritha Chandra
Online Education and the Struggle over Disposable Time
Robert Koehler
Learning from the Hibakushas
Seth Sandronsky
Teaching in a Pandemic: an Interview With Mercedes K. Schneider
Dean Baker
Financing Drug Development: What the Pandemic Has Taught Us
Greta Anderson
Blaming Mexican Wolves for Livestock Kills
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Meaning of the Battle of Salamis
Mel Gurtov
The World Bank’s Poverty Illusion
Paul Gilk
The Great Question
Rev. Susan K. Williams Smith
Trump Doesn’t Want Law and Order
Martin Cherniack
Neo-conservatism: The Seductive Lure of Lying About History
Nicky Reid
Pick a Cold War, Any Cold War!
George Wuerthner
Zombie Legislation: the Latest Misguided Wildfire Bill
Lee Camp
The Execution of Elephants and Americans
Christopher Brauchli
I Read the News Today, Oh Boy…
Tony McKenna
The Truth About Prince Philip
Louis Proyect
MarxMail 2.0
Sidney Miralao
Get Military Recruiters Out of Our High Schools
Jon Hochschartner
Okra of Time
David Yearsley
Bringing Landscapes to Life: the Music of Johann Christian Bach
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail