FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Playing Geopolitical Whack-a-Mole: The Viet Nam Flag Issue Revisited

The National Flag of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

If a US educational institution enrolls Vietnamese students, chances are there’s a Vietnamese flag displayed somewhere, perhaps in the student center, along with the flags of the other countries represented in that school’s international student population. I’m referring to the red flag with a yellow star not the yellow one with three red stripes flag of a country that was relegated to the dung heap of history 44 years ago.

If there is an overseas Vietnamese community located nearby, it’s only a matter of time before it catches wind of this fact like flies to honey. If the administration doesn’t acquiesce, the smiles will quickly vanish from their faces and what started out as an innocuous and upbeat initial encounter could quickly metamorphose into a battle of words and emotions. For many overseas Vietnamese, the war didn’t end in April 1975 but continues, at least in thought, word and, occasionally, murderous deed.

This story has played out with tiresome predictability in the political arena in parts of the US with large Vietnamese-American communities, including California, Florida, Texas, Virginia, and Washington state. A 2005 radio commentary entitled The Vietnam Flag Issue — Here We Go Again that I wrote about an incident in California was one such example.

Why? Because the old guard element of these communities is consumed with bitterness, resentment, and hatred of a Viet Nam they do not know. And because they lost. They are zealots who are living in the past and in blind denial of historical truth. They inhabit a geopolitical fantasy world, not unlike those in the US who still proudly fly the flag of the Confederate States of America (CSA) and dream about how the South will rise again someday. Or veterans of that ignominious US war in Viet Nam who still cling to the belief that it was a grand and glorious cause for freedom and democracy when, in reality, it was an ongoing Vietnamese struggle for self-determination and independence.

The Real Vietnamese Flag

Here’s some background information about the legitimate Vietnamese flag and what the colors signify.  It wasn’t until the early 1980s that research revealed who actually designed the flag. It was Nguyễn Hữu Tiến, a leader of the uprising against the French in November 1940 in southern Viet Nam.  (He was subsequently arrested by the French and executed the following year.)

This is what Tiến wrote in his poem:

… All those of red blood and yellow skin
Together we fight under the nation’s sacred flag
The flag is soaked with our crimson blood, shed for the nation
The yellow star is the color of our race’s skin
Stand up, quickly! The nation’s soul is calling for us
Intellectuals, peasants, workers, traders and armymen
United as a five-pointed yellow star…

Most Vietnamese students studying in the US are proud of their country and want to see its flag displayed at their host institutions not that of a client state in a divided Viet Nam that ceased to exist in 1975.

The Lobbying Process

Here’s a brief soup-to-nuts look at the Vietnamese-American flag issue playbook. Chances are the offending institution will receive a phone call and/or email from a leader of the local community asking that the flag of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (SRV), the only legitimate Viet Nam, be replaced with that of the Republic of Viet Nam (RVN or “South Vietnam”), the so-called Heritage and Freedom Flag. They may even offer to donate it in a feigned spirit of generosity and goodwill.

The old flag of South Vietnam.

This will start out as a request. If the institution pushes back, the polite request may very well quickly escalate into a demand. When you confront unreasonable and irrational people with reality and historical truth, they become angry. Next, they will ratchet up the pressure with more emails and calls, requests for meetings, and even demonstrations with people chanting and carrying the Freedom and Heritage flag, resulting in media coverage of this faux controversy. Some of the older members of the community who served in the Army of the Republic of Viet Nam (ARVN) may even show up in uniform, medals and all.

A “Teachable” Moment

If the community goes on the warpath, no pun intended, the administration could turn lemons into lemonade and use this confrontation as a “teachable moment” to educate people about the origins of that war. For example, if the US had not chosen to ignore a key provision of the Geneva Accords of 1954, there would have been a national election in 1956 that Ho Chi Minh would have won with 80% of the popular vote, according to President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s memoirs and other US sources.

View this as an opportunity to organize lectures and seminars about the war that will educate the academic and local community and, in doing so, jam the transmission of those Vietnamese-Americans who are at the forefront of this perverse lobbying campaign.

As I noted in an August 2019 article entitled Coming to Terms with the Past by Honoring Historical Truth: The Case of Fulbright University Vietnam, “Without the suffering, death, and destruction inflicted, mostly from 1965 to 1972, by the US, its client state, and allies, e.g., Australia, South Korea and others, Viet Nam would be at a very different stage of development perhaps even in the same league as Singapore.  Most importantly, 3.8 million Vietnamese, over half of whom were civilians, and 58,300 Americans, would not have lost their lives.”

Another obvious point is that the US government pledged to recognize and respect the SRV flag when it established full diplomatic relations with that country in 1995 the support of US senators such as Max Cleland, Bob Kerrey, John Kerry, and John McCain, who were also war veterans. Two years later, President Clinton appointed former POW and US congressman Douglas “Pete” Peterson as the first US Ambassador to Viet Nam. It is not a point of debate but a fact, regardless of your opinion of the country that flag has represented since reunification. It is a country that Donald Trump has visited twice since becoming president and is considered to be an important US strategic partner in Southeast Asia.

What to Do?

My advice to institutions confronted with this issue is that under no circumstances should they cave to a demand to replace the SRV flag with that of the RVN.  There are two main reasons for this. First, to do so would be to deny historical truth in a world already inundated with fake news, and current geopolitical reality. Secondly, it may create problems with the SRV government, which could in turn affect that institution’s standing in Viet Nam.

Vietnamese-American communities have every right to fly the old RVN flag in their community centers, shops, and in the cyberwinds of the Internet on their websites.  It’s also their right to live in a geopolitical fantasy world.  They don’t have the right, however, legal or otherwise, to make the same request (or demand) of educational institutions.

Most Vietnamese-American communities have progressive elements, young and old.  It’s important for colleagues to reach out to and develop long-term relationships with those individuals. The Vietnamese diaspora is a diverse community not a monolith. While there are thousands of overseas Vietnamese working in Viet Nam in the private and NGO sectors, including one I mentioned in this 2-19 article, there are others who come here with the goal of destabilizing the country and its government.

In a 2015 series entitled Terror in Little Saigon – An old war comes to a new country, ProPublica reported an investigation into the assassination of five Vietnamese-American journalists between 1981 and 1990 in California, Texas, and Virginia. That’s what the more radical elements of the Vietnamese-American community are capable of doing to people with whom they disagree – just as they did in the old country. To date no arrests have been made, which means justice remains elusive for the victims and their families.

My hope is that this perennial spectacle involving the “Heritage and Freedom Flag” will soon become a historical footnote with the imminent passing of the older generation. I’m not so sure, however, knowing that there are members of the younger generation who are as delusional as their parents and grandparents. I remember the time when I was in a Vietnamese restaurant in northern California and spoke some Vietnamese (with a northern accent) to the cashier, a woman in her 30s. That friendly smile faded in a heartbeat, replaced by a glare of hostility. I suddenly felt a chill in what had been a warm and hospitable ambience. In other words, time will tell.

More articles by:

Mark A. Ashwill is an international educator who has lived and worked in Vietnam since 2005.  He blogs at An International Educator in Viet Nam

July 08, 2020
Laura Carlsen
Lopez Obrador’s Visit to Trump is a Betrayal of the U.S. and Mexican People
Melvin Goodman
Afghanistan: What is to be Done?
Thomas Klikauer – Norman Simms
The End of the American Newspaper
Sonali Kolhatkar
The Merits of Medicare for All Have Been Proven by This Pandemic
David Rosen
It’s Now Ghislaine Maxwell’s Turn
Nicolas J S Davies
Key U.S. Ally Indicted for Organ Trade Murder Scheme
Bob Lord
Welcome to Hectobillionaire Land
Laura Flanders
The Great American Lie
John Kendall Hawkins
Van Gogh’s Literary Influences
Marc Norton
Reopening vs. Lockdown is a False Dichotomy
Joel Schlosberg
“All the Credit He Gave Us:” Time to Drop Hamilton’s Economics
CounterPunch News Service
Tribes Defeat Trump Administration and NRA in 9th Circuit on Sacred Grizzly Bear Appeal
John Feffer
The US is Now the Global Public Health Emergency
Nick Licata
Three Books on the 2020 Presidential Election and Their Relevance to the Black Live Matter Protests
Elliot Sperber
The Breonna Taylor Bridge
July 07, 2020
Richard Eskow
The War on Logic: Contradictions and Absurdities in the House’s Military Spending Bill
Daniel Beaumont
Gimme Shelter: the Brief And Strange History of CHOP (AKA CHAZ)
Richard C. Gross
Trump’s War
Patrick Cockburn
Trump’s Racism May be Blatant, But the Culture He Defends Comes Out of the Civil War and Goes Well Beyond Racial Division
Andrew Stewart
Can We Compare the George Floyd Protests to the Vietnam War Protests? Maybe, But the Analogy is Imperfect
Walden Bello
The Racist Underpinnings of the American Way of War
Nyla Ali Khan
Fallacious Arguments Employed to Justify the Revocation of Jammu and Kashmir’s Autonomy and Its Bifurcation
Don Fitz
A Statue of Hatuey
Dean Baker
Unemployment Benefits Should Depend on the Pandemic
Ramzy Baroud – Romana Rubeo
Will the ICC Investigation Bring Justice for Palestine?
Sam Pizzigati
Social Distancing for Mega-Million Fun and Profit
Dave Lindorff
Private: Why the High Dudgeon over Alleged Russian Bounties for Taliban Slaying of US Troops
George Wuerthner
Of Fire and Fish
Binoy Kampmark
Killing Koalas: the Promise of Extinction Down Under
Parth M.N.
Back to School in Rural India: Digital Divide to Digital Partition
Ed Sanders
The Burning of Newgate Prison: a Glyph
July 06, 2020
Melvin Goodman
Foreign Election Interference: Who is to Blame?
JoAnn Wypijewski
On Disposability and Rebellion: Insights From a Rank-and-File Insurgency
Marshall Auerback – Jan Frel
There’s a Hidden Economic Trendline That is Shattering the Global Trade System
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A Just and Talented Government for Our Hazardous Age
Manuel García, Jr.
Biosphere Warming in Numbers
Ron Jacobs
Kidnapping Kids: As American as the Fourth of July
Tasha Jones
Pyramids. Plantations. Projects. Penitentiaries
Binoy Kampmark
Criminalising Journalism: Australia’s National Security Craze
Eve Ottenberg
Re-Organizing Labor
Mike Garrity
How We Stopped Trump From Trashing a Critical Montana Roadless Area in Grizzly Habitat
Nino Pagliccia
The Meaning of the 1811 Independence for Today’s Venezuela
Michael Galant
We Need a Global Green New Deal
Jill Richardson
Learning Not to Look Away
Marshall Sahlins
Donald Trump at 130,000 and Rising
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail