FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Yemen’s Fate is in Trump’s Hands

Drawing by Nathaniel St. Clair

Congress has finally grown a spine.

For the first time in more than forty years, Congress has invoked the War Powers Resolution to demand that the US end its assistance to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in their war against Houthi rebels in Yemen.  The US has been involved in the Saudi-led war without the authorization of Congress as mandated by the Constitution.

The resolution went to President Donald Trump’s desk on Thursday.  As I write this, Trump has not yet vetoed the resolution.  Trump, however, has said that he will, and has been saying it since at least March of last year.  The Administration argues that, contrary to the resolution’s language, the US is not involved in “hostilities” in Yemen because the US is not bombing the country.  Nor are US troops on the ground.  The US extends limited “non-combat support” by providing arms, intelligence, and targeting advice.  (In November, the US announced that it would cease in-flight refueling of coalition warplanes.)  Furthermore, Article II’s “Commander in Chief” power gives the president Constitutional authority for these activities.

The UN calls Yemen the “world’s worst humanitarian disaster.”  As many as 85,000 children may have died during the war from starvation and disease, according to the international NGO Save the Children.  Seventeen million Yemenis are at risk of famine.  A Saudi blockade keeps drastically needed food and medical aid from reaching Yemenis.  US assistance makes the Saudi devastation of Yemen possible.

Congress does not share the president’s doglike loyalty to the Saudis and to the kingdom’s de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (“MBS,” as he is called).  Most members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, reached their limit with MBS last October when US resident and Washington Postcolumnist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered and carved up in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.  Anonymous sources in the CIA say that the Agency has concluded that MBS personally ordered Khashoggi’s murder.

On April 4, a bipartisan group of three Senators and six Members of Congress sent President Trump a letter, urging him to sign the resolution.[1]  The lawmakers draw on every ounce of their cunning in hopes of averting an almost certain Trumpian veto.

Step One:  Tie Yemen to the hated Barack Obama.  The April 4 letter emphasizes that it was President Barack Obama who took the US into Yemen in 2015.  This is a transparent gambit to get Trump to withdraw from Yemen just as he withdrew the US from the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris Climate Accord.  (Trump hasn’t yet destroyed Obamacare, but he’s working on it.)

Step Two:  Play on Trump’s avarice.  Trump gave a reason for his muted response to the Saudis’ murder of Jamal Khashoggi:  arms sales.  During a meeting with MBS at the White House on March 20, 2018, Trump boasted about a $110 billion US arms sale to the Saudis.[2]  Trump told reporters:   “Saudi Arabia is a very wealthy nation and they’re going to give the United States some of that wealth, hopefully, in the form of jobs, in the form of the purchase of the finest military equipment anywhere in the world.”  The April 4 letter takes care to say that the War Powers Resolution “has no bearing on U.S. weapons sales to the Saudi Kingdom.”

The proper response to this argument is gritted teeth.  What the Saudis do with US weapons is no secret.  Senator Bernie Sanders has pointed out that the US has “been providing the bombs that the Saudi-led coalition is using….” Sanders added:  “In too many cases our weapons are being used to kill civilians.” Sanders specifically mentioned an incident in August 2018 when a bomb manufactured by Lockheed Martin killed 40 Yemeni boys aboard a school bus.

The War Powers Resolution allows the US to continue to function as the arsenal of autocracy.  Arms sales to the Saudis will continue.  However, the US also wants to sell Saudi Arabia nuclear reactors.  Is Trump willing to endanger thatmulti-billion dollar deal?  How about Trump’s own lucrative dealings with the Saudis? Will Trump jeopardize the millions of dollars the Saudis spend in Trump hotels?

Don’t expect to read any of this in Trump’s veto message to Congress, however.  Instead, we will be treated to a sanctimonious assertion that the US must continue to assist our Saudi and Emirati allies in order to counter the spread of Iranian influence in the region.  We will hear that this is certain to occur if the Iranian-backed Houthis are not defeated.

Trump vs. Trump

“Two souls, alas, are housed within my breast.”

—Goethe, Faust, Part I

The April 4 letter points out that Trump “has spoken out against costly and never-ending conflicts around the globe.” The lawmakers are appealing to the Trump who claims, accurately or not, that he opposed the Iraq war from the beginning.  This is the same Trump who announced in December 2018 that he was pulling about 7,000 American troops out of Afghanistan and all US troops from Syria (some 2,000 troops).

That is one Trump.  There is another.  The other Trump bragged during his presidential campaign that he was the “most militaristic person ever” and swore to annihilate ISIS.  Liberal interventionists and neoconservatives alike paint Trump as an isolationist, but Trump isn’t an isolationist.  An isolationist doesn’t ask for a military budget of $717 billion (and get it), as Trump did for FY 2019.

Moreover, under Trump, US armed forces are still involved in actions all over the world.  As Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov retorted indignantly, in response to a US demand that Russia leave Venezuela:  “The whole world is dotted” with US military bases (some 800, according to Newsweek, in a story which includes a map of US bases worldwide).  I am very much afraid that this is the Trump who will decide whether to end US involvement in Yemen.

The War Powers Resolution passed in the Senate by 54 to 46.  All Democrats and 7 Republicans voted in favor of the resolution.  The resolution passed in the House by 247 to 175. Sixteen Republicans voted in favor and one Republican voted “present.”  These numbers don’t come close to the two-thirds majorities in each chamber needed to override a presidential veto.

Congress should not have to stop a war that it never authorized.  The Constitution entrusts Congress alone with the power to take the US into war.  For too long, presidents have usurped this power. Unfortunately, the War Powers Resolution has the unintended effect of giving a president carte blancheto make war unless blocked by two-thirds majorities in both chambers of Congress.  Nevertheless, the Yemen resolution is a welcome sign that Congress is taking its first steps towards reclaiming its Constitutional primacy over war.

Notes.

[1]  Among the signers are Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Mike Lee (R-Ut.) and Members of Congress Pramila Jayapal (D-Wa.) and Barbara Lee (D-Ca.).

[2]  Current and former US governmentofficials say $110 billion is a wildly exaggerated figure conjured up by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.  Also, the bulk of the sales Trump boasted about were negotiated under President Obama.

 

More articles by:

Charles Pierson is a lawyer and a member of the Pittsburgh Anti-Drone Warfare Coalition. E-mail him at Chapierson@yahoo.com.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

June 17, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
The Dark Side of Brexit: Britain’s Ethnic Minorities Are Facing More and More Violence
Linn Washington Jr.
Remember the Vincennes? The US’s Long History of Provoking Iran
Geoff Dutton
Where the Wild Things Were: Abbey’s Road Revisited
Nick Licata
Did a Coverup of Who Caused Flint Michigan’s Contaminated Water Continue During Its Investigation? 
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Scales of Justice: Exceptions, Extraditions and Politics
John Feffer
Democracy Faces a Global Crisis
Louisa Willcox
Revamping Grizzly Bear Recovery
Stephen Cooper
“Wheel! Of! Fortune!” (A Vegas Story)
Daniel Warner
Let Us Laugh Together, On Principle
Brian Cloughley
Trump Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Weekend Edition
June 14, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Michael Hudson
Trump’s Trade Threats are Really Cold War 2.0
Bruce E. Levine
Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry
Jason Hirthler
Mainstream 101: Supporting Imperialism, Suppressing Socialism
T.J. Coles
How Much Do Humans Pollute? A Breakdown of Industrial, Vehicular and Household C02 Emissions
Andrew Levine
Whither The Trump Paradox?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of 10,000 Talkers, All With Broken Tongues
Pete Dolack
Look to U.S. Executive Suites, Not Beijing, For Why Production is Moved
Paul Street
It Can’t Happen Here: From Buzz Windrip and Doremus Jessup to Donald Trump and MSNBC
Rob Urie
Capitalism Versus Democracy
Richard Moser
The Climate Counter-Offensive: Secrecy, Deception and Disarming the Green New Deal
Naman Habtom-Desta
Up in the Air: the Fallacy of Aerial Campaigns
Ramzy Baroud
Kushner as a Colonial Administrator: Let’s Talk About the ‘Israeli Model’
Mark Hand
Residents of Toxic W.Va. Town Keep Hope Alive
John Kendall Hawkins
Alias Anything You Please: a Lifetime of Dylan
Linn Washington Jr.
Bigots in Blue: Philadelphia Police Department is a Home For Hate
David Macaray
UAW Faces Its Moment of Truth
Brian Cloughley
Trump’s Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Horace G. Campbell
Edward Seaga and the Institutionalization of Thuggery, Violence and Dehumanization in Jamaica
Graham Peebles
Zero Waste: The Global Plastics Crisis
Michael Schwalbe
Oppose Inequality, Not Cops
Ron Jacobs
Scott Noble’s History of Resistance
Olivia Alperstein
The Climate Crisis is Also a Health Emergency
David Rosen
Time to Break Up the 21st Century Tech Trusts
George Wuerthner
The Highest Use of Public Forests: Carbon Storage
Ralph Nader
It is Time to Rediscover Print Newspapers
Nick Licata
How SDS Imploded: an Inside Account
Rachel Smolker – Anne Peterman
The GE American Chestnut: Restoration of a Beloved Species or Trojan Horse for Tree Biotechnology?
Sam Pizzigati
Can Society Survive Without Empathy?
Manuel E. Yepe
China and Russia in Strategic Alliance
Patrick Walker
Green New Deal “Climate Kids” Should Hijack the Impeachment Conversation
Colin Todhunter
Encouraging Illegal Planting of Bt Brinjal in India
Robert Koehler
The Armed Bureaucracy
David Swanson
Anyone Who’d Rather Not be Shot Should Read this Book
Jonathan Power
To St. Petersburg With Love
Marc Levy
How to Tell a Joke in Combat
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail