Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question

The disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul amid published reports that he was murdered and dismembered by representatives of the Saudi government has caused a dilemma for many announced participants at a glittery investor’s conference. Is it the right thing to do to attend a meeting in Riyadh when doubts exist about Khashoggi’s assassination by orders of the royal family? How would it look for a leading businessman to be seen next to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman when investigators are examining his personal role in Khashoggi’s disappearance?

Business and ethics, the common narrative tells us, are distinctly different. The object of business is to maximize profits, the object of ethics is to behave according to moral principles. The businessman is concerned with the bottom line; the ethicist is concerned with higher values. Attendance at a conference in Saudi Arabia, officially the Future Investment Initiative but colloquially called the “Davos in the Desert, appears to highlight the traditional tension between the two.

The monetary stakes are high. Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest oil producer and biggest economy in the Middle East. At last year’s meeting in Riyadh, the prince presented a blueprint for a futuristic city to rise from the desert costing $500 billion. There are huge interests involved in doing business in and with Saudi Arabia. And yet, businessmen Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase, Dara Khosrowshahi of Uber, Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone Group and Lawrence D. Fink of BlackRock have withdrawn from the conference. The British trade minister, the French and Dutch finance ministers and the president of the International Monetary Fund have also cancelled.

What about the United States? President Trump, not surprisingly, has wavered. Financial interests came first. “When I went there, they committed to purchase $400 billion worth of things, and $110 billion worth of military,” he said.  His concern that Congress would impose sanctions led him to not only send Secretary of State Michael Pompeo to speak to the Saudi leaders but to cancel the participation of Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in the conference.

Trump declared that the US will inflict “severe punishment” on Saudi Arabia if the kingdom’s leaders are found responsible for the death of Khashoggi.Torn between the traditional American policy of favoring Saudi Arabia as a lynchpin in the Middle East against Iran and the horrors of what probably happened to the Washington Postjournalist and U.S. permanent resident, Trump is caught between the businessman’s bottom line and bad publicity.

The president has not turned to higher values. Saudi Arabia was the first country he visited after becoming president. He has never criticized Saudi Arabia for its actions in Yemen that have caused a disastrous humanitarian crisis. He has never criticized the human rights situation in Saudi Arabia where the leaders of the movement to let women drive have been imprisoned. Nor has attention been drawn to the arrest of important Saudis in a hotel for three months until they paid ransoms to be released or the kidnapping of the prime minister of Lebanon. And he has certainly not brought up the role of Saudi Arabia in 9/11 when only Saudis were allowed to fly out of the United States right after the attacks.

The cancellations to the conference are short-term reactions to a long-term situation. Granted that Saudi Arabia is an important geopolitical ally of the United States in the region. But is this a reason to ignore flagrant violations of human rights within the country and its foreign policy? The Khashoggi disappearance is not an isolated incident.

The separation of business from ethics, like the separation of geopolitics from ethics, is a false, binary distinction. Values, such as human rights and sustainable development, are part and parcel of today’s world. Companies that use child laborers or companies that purposely commit environmental degradation are realizing the price they pay for their actions. Witness Philip Morris International’s statement that “We’re building PMI’s future on smoke-free products that are a much better choice than cigarette smoking.” Look at how Canada protested the arrest of human rights activists in Saudi Arabia.

The conference in Riyadh was problematic from the start because the companies’ interest in doing business with the Saudi government was as questionable as the United States’ uncritical promotion of Saudi Arabia as an important ally. Because of Jamal Khashoggi’s disappearance, there is a realization that years of turning a blind eye to a repressive regime was mistaken. It looks as though the Crown Prince is the latest version of Franklin Roosevelt’s supposed 1939 remark about the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza: “He may be a son of a bitch but he’s our son of a bitch.”

“Oh, when will they ever learn?” sang Peter, Paul & Mary.

More articles by:


June 26, 2019
Melvin Goodman
The U.S.-Iran Imbroglio: Dangerous Lessons To Be Learned
Paul Street
Reflections and Correspondence at the Abyss
John Laforge
Trump’s Ministry of No Information
Paul Edwards
Fool Me Twice
Rob Hager
Warren and Sanders: Compare and Contrast
John Steppling
The Monkey’s Face
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A World of Shadows
Jaspal Kaur Sadhu Singh
Correcting a Colonial Injustice: The Return of the Chagos Islands to Its Natives
Binoy Kampmark
Violent Voyeurism: Surveillance, Spyware and Human Rights
Jonah Raskin
Reflections on Abbie Hoffman and Joshua Furst’s Novel, Revolutionaries
Dave Chapman
The Hydroponic Threat to Organic Food
June 25, 2019
Rannie Amiri
Instigators of a Persian Gulf Crisis
Patrick Cockburn
Trump May Already be in Too Deep to Avoid War With Iran
Paul Tritschler
Hopeful Things
John Feffer
Deep Fakes: Will AI Swing the 2020 Election?
Binoy Kampmark
Bill Clinton in Kosovo
Kenneth Surin
Brief Impressions of the Japanese Conjuncture
Edward Hunt
Is Mexico Winding Down or Winding up the Drug War?
Manuel E. Yepe
Trump’s Return to Full-Spectrum Dominance
Steve Kelly
Greed and Politics Should Not Drive Forest Policy
Stephen Carpa
Protecting the Great Burn
Colin Todhunter
‘Modified’: A Film About GMOs and the Corruption of the Food Supply for Profit
Martin Billheimer
The Gothic and the Idea of a ‘Real Elite’
Elliot Sperber
Send ICE to Hanford
June 24, 2019
Jim Kavanagh
Eve of Destruction: Iran Strikes Back
Nino Pagliccia
Sorting Out Reality From Fiction About Venezuela
Jeff Sher
Pickin’ and Choosin’ the Winners and Losers of Climate Change
Howard Lisnoff
“Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran”
Robert Fisk
The West’s Disgraceful Silence on the Death of Morsi
Dean Baker
The Old Japan Disaster Horror Story
David Mattson
The Gallatin Forest Partnership and the Tyranny of Ego
George Wuerthner
How Mountain Bikes Threaten Wilderness
Christopher Ketcham
The Journalist as Hemorrhoid
Manuel E. Yepe
Yankee Worship of Bombings and Endless Wars
Mel Gurtov
Iran—Who and Where is The Threat?
Wim Laven
Revisiting Morality in the Age of Dishonesty
Thomas Knapp
Facebook’s Libra Isn’t a “Cryptocurrency”
Weekend Edition
June 21, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Brett Wilkins
A Brief History of US Concentration Camps
Rob Urie
Race, Identity and the Political Economy of Hate
Rev. William Alberts
America’s Respectable War Criminals
Paul Street
“So Happy”: The Trump “Boom,” the Nation’s Despair, and the Decline of Joe Biden
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Ask Your Local Death Squad
Dr. Vandana Shiva
Fake Food, Fake Meat: Big Food’s Desperate Attempt to Further the Industrialisation of Food
Eric Draitser
The Art of Trade War: Is Trump Winning His Trade War against China?
Melvin Goodman
Trump’s Russian Problem