FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Pension Systems and the Deadly Hand of the Market

A recent photo and its accompanying article from the Toronto Star bear comment.  The reaching hands are not of rioting, starving people grasping for food but of stockbrokers on the trading floor.  The article, about protecting individual portfolios, counsels people to know of their options though “the majority of investors have little or no understanding of puts and calls and, in most cases, don’t want to be bothered.”  A number of practices keep the public uninformed, including a plethora of neologisms that defy comprehension, lack of transparency, and skewed computations that omit life’s crucial externalities.  Economics has been called the “dismal science”, but “abysmal”  more fittingly describes its deadly impact on people worldwide.

The Canadian Pension Plan [CPP} is believed by many to represent the caring face of Canada, while it is lauded as the “New Masters of the Universe” and “Maple Revolutionaries” by the OECD, G20, and the World Bank.  “OECD analysts describe these Canadian funds as ‘pioneers in infrastructure investing’ that helped to establish infrastructure as an important and increasingly popular asset class.”[1]  It is no exaggeration to state that the CPP is “banking on death”, the title of Robin Blackburn’s comprehensive history of pensions.  The Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade and here lists CPP investments in seventy three corporations supporting Israel’s military/police/surveillance/prison industrial complex.  The CPP is also a big investor in nuclear weapons and in Canada’s fossil fuel and mining sectors which are wreaking havoc in indigenous communities worldwide.

At its core is the pricing of  human life in the capitalist system.  Monbiot succinctly explains it in his article about Britain’s chief economist Nicholas Stern’s influential report on climate change and the economy:   Stern calculated that Heathrow airport expansion makes economic sense because it lessens the time that a rich person has to wait for a flight as his time is worth much money, so this wealth far outweighs the monetary loss if many impoverished people die due to aviation’s carbon emissions.

In 2016, private pension assets in OECD countries reached their highest-ever level at over US $38 trillion. Pension funds are part of a closed political economic system and its facilitating legalities.  Representative are the links between the CPP, Imperial Oil, universities and think tanks, and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP)  to “free, prior and informed consent”.  While information is essential, particularly for indigenous people subject to land theft and to environmental contaminants,  UN declarations are non-binding and unenforceable.  Nonetheless, Anglo-Saxon democracies were the last to sign.

The importance of “Informed consent” derives from the infamous longitudinal Tuskegee syphilis experiments on Black men who were not informed that they would notbe treated for syphilis even though treatments were available.   In practice,   informed consent has been turned on its head  as it is often configured to protects power.

Indigenous consentis obstructed by many loopholes:  the state’s claim of eminent domain, the  Doctrine of Discovery justifying European expropriation of supposedly “empty” land (terra nullius), a clause of Canada’s Delgmuukw ruling on Aboriginal title that allows the Canadian government to infringe on title under specific circumstances, the Carter doctrine asserting U.S. entitlement to Canadian resources for national security purposes, trade agreements that pre-empt national laws,  the Canadian Mining Act which “does not require that the holder of an exploration permit inform property owners of its existence … and that the permit can be acquired via the Internet with a simple click  [so] that First Nations, property owners, and municipalities are ever informed or forewarned of the acquisition of a land claim on their land or territory.”[2]  The Canadian National Energy Board is made up of industry people whose consultations with Indigenous people and the general public are minimal.

CPP investments are also opaque.   Private equities have privacy protections, ostensibly to protect trade secrets. “The CPPIB’s (Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board) private equity team is a blessing to the oil patch.  In addition to holding shares in Canada’s largest oil, gas, and coal companies, the most impressive CPPIB contribution to the sector comes from their private equity arm.”

The Canadian Pension Plan is a major investor in Imperial Oil, with its tar sands operations, pipelines, and refineries wreaking destruction on indigenous communities in Canada and abroad.  An investigation into the Imperial Oil refinery adjacent to the Aamjiwnaang First Nations in Sarnia, Ontario, just published on May 5th, revealed that it emits ten times more fine particulate matter, seven times more carbon monoxide, and 49 times more sulphur dioxide than the nearby Detroit plant.  Imperial Oil owns four facilities within 2 to 7 km from Aamjiwnaang.  40% of Canada’s petrochemical industry surrounds this small community.  The water is so contaminated that it affects endocrine balance:  two girls are born for every boy, and the effects on health have been substantiated by medical and legal reports and a charter challenge launched on behalf of the 800 member Aamjiwnaang community.   In 2017 Imperial Oil’s flaring caused a five-hour massive explosion.   Over 500 incident reports had been filed in 2014 and 2015 for spills and leaks in the Sarnia area: yet only one public warning had been issued through the municipality’s alert system.  The government has still not installed an effective monitoring and warning system.

Critical information is withheld or concealed.  The Canadian government fired public health physician Dr. John O’Connor for informing the public of rare forms of cancer in Chippewa First Nations communities downstream from the tar sands, nor is it broadcast that  preeminent climate scientist James Hansen states that tar sands development means “game over” for the planet.  Pam Palmater,  indigenous lawyer and Chair in Indigenous Governance at Ryerson University, writes of the latest pipeline expansions:

“Trudeau’s approval of the Kinder Morgan expansion is proof – once and for all – that even the most charming leader, with the biggest tears and sincerest sounding apologies, who is ‘absolutely’ committed to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples – can and will ignore those rights in the name of corporate interests every single time.”

Imperial Oil is 69.6% owned by Exxon-Mobil, the corporation associated with Rex Tillerson and with deception of the public about climate change.  Oil was discovered in Ontario in 1858, a year before Titusville Pennsylvania, and by 1880 the Imperial Oil Company was producing, distributing, and refining oil.  In the 1950s Imperial Oil and smaller companies banded together to lease some 2 million acres in the tar sands and by the early 1960s there were generous, publicly funded incentives and loose regulations to promote extraction.  Imperial’s Board of Directors come from Exxon-Mobil, from the conservative C.D. Howe Institute,  from executive positions at the major universities.  In 1975, the chair of Imperial Oil led other CEOs to form the Business Council on National Issues, now the Canadian Council of Chief Executives with close ties to the Canadian and U.S. governments.  In 2014 Exxon published a detailed report that brushed aside concerns about climate change, “saying oil and gas will remain the dominant sources of energy through 2040…”[3]

The former president and CEO of the CPPIB, Mark Wiseman, was also “bullish on the fossil fuel sector.”  Wiseman recently left the CPP to join his wife at BlackRock, the world’s largest investment manager.  A Code Pink petition states that BlackRock is “making a killing on killing!” with its investments in Lockheed, Raytheon, Northrop Grunman, Elbit, and General Dynamics – exactly the same investments as the CPP.

The current head of CPPIB is Heather Munroe-Blum.  She is Principal and Vice-Chancellor of McGill University and her directorships include the Association of American Universities, the Conference Board of Canada, Rio Tinto, CGI (oil and gas sector), the Royal Bank of Canada (mining).  She is a vocal opponent of the academic boycott of Israeli universities McGill  Her combined pension entitlements gave her the richest package of any university president in Canada at a time when Quebec universities were being asked to absorb $124m in cuts.

The main variables in providing social security have been whether to provide universal or selective coverage, to what degree it should be publicly funded, and the sources of funding.  Traditional communities characteristically developed a range of ways to care for their members, whereas nation states came late, if at all, to take on social security, and originally only for selected groups like military men or senior state functionaries.  “It was not until the epoch of the French Revolution and its Declaration a the Rights of Man and the Citizen that the first proposals were heard for the paying of pensions as of right to all citizens who had reached an advanced age and were in want.” It was the “unlikely executor of the social legacy of French republicanism … Otto von Bismarck, who established the first universal pension system in 1889.”[4]   The modest 1935 U.S. Social Security Act provided a minimal benefit. Initially it did not cover non-waged women’s work or Black people.  Its strengths were that it was a federal program, that it was comprehensive and not voluntary, and that it had its own autonomous administration

Despite hopes that social security would be a stepping stone to a socialized society, insufficient benefits necessitated supplementary pensions.  From the 1970s, pension fund managers took advantage of the erosion of New Deal protections and of the inflow of capital from abroad [5], and by the 1990s pension funds became a powerful driver of financialization.   The trajectory has been from state responsibility for universal benefits at one end, to private pension funds based on individual contributions.  In the cases of the Enron and Nortel Network bankruptcies, pensioners took huge losses as their plans were not guaranteed, and money from asset sales were prioritized for paying legal fees, creditors, and fund managers.

The erosion of state responsibility for social security was further exacerbated by the concerted assault on unions, a factor in the decline of cross-border class solidarity.  The inclusion of union representatives on pension boards does not effectively change the “fund-first” principle of fiduciary duty that weights profit over social justice and the public interest.[6]  Not untypical is the case of American and Canadian pension fund investments in Chile’s privately owned water utilities despite a mass social movement within Chile to re-nationalize water.[7]

Currently, divestment victories are politically significant and a result of public pressure. Unlike corporate shareholders and coop members, contributors to pension plans do not have a vote.    System change is urgent:  fossil fuel impacts are already transforming ocean circulation, the jet stream, even the stratosphere, and are amplifying positive feedbacks.   An adequate social security system at this calamitous time needs to go beyond monetary benefits, to go beyond mere reform, and ensure across national border housing, food, and health care for all.  It is intolerable that the knowledge- and morally- compromised few “bank on death” of the majority human population.

Notes.

[1] Kevin Skerrett. “Canada’s Public Pension Funds: The “New Masters of the (Neoliberal) Universe” p. 122, in Kevin Skerrett et al. The Contradictions of Pension Fund Capitalism. (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Labor and Employment Relations Association Series. 2017).

[2] Deneault and Sacher, Imperial Canada Inc: Legal Haven of Choice for the World’s Mining Industries. (Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2012) p, 146-47.

[3] Andrew Nikiforuk. Slick Water: Fracking and One Insider’s Stand Against the World’s Most Powerful Industry. (Berkeley: Greystone Books, 2015).

[4] Robin Blackburn. Banking on Death. (New York: Verso, 2002). P 39-47.  Also see Chapters 2, 4, 6.

[5] Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin.  The Making of Global Capitalism: the political economy of American empire.  (New York: Verso, 2013). p. 175ff.

[6]  “Labor’s Voice on Pension Boards” p 186-87. Johanna Westar and Anil Verma) in Kevin Skerrett.

[7] Skerrett p. 133,in  Kevin Skerrett.

More articles by:

Judith Deutsch is a member of the Socialist Project, Independent Jewish Voices, and  former president of Science for Peace. She is a psychoanalyst in Toronto. She can be reached at:   judithdeutsch0@gmail.com.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

June 19, 2019
Matthew Stevenson
Requiem for a Lightweight: the Mayor Pete Factor
Kenneth Surin
In China Again
Stephen Cooper
Abolishing the Death Penalty Requires Morality
George Ochenski
The DNC Can’t Be Allowed to Ignore the Climate Crisis
John W. Whitehead
The Omnipresent Surveillance State
William Camacaro - Frederick B. Mills
Guaidó’s Star Fades as His Envoys to Colombia Allegedly Commit Fraud With Humanitarian Funds for Venezuela
Dave Lindorff
What About Venezuela’s Hacked Power Grid?
Howard Lisnoff
Try Not to Look Away
Binoy Kampmark
Matters of Water: Dubious Approvals and the Adani Carmichael Mine
Karl Grossman
The Battle to Stop the Shoreham Nuclear Plant, Revisited
Kani Xulam
Farting in a Turkish Mosque
Dean Baker
New Manufacturing Jobs are Not Union Jobs
Elizabeth Keyes
“I Can’t Believe Alcohol Is Stronger Than Love”
June 18, 2019
John McMurtry
Koch-Oil Big Lies and Ecocide Writ Large in Canada
Robert Fisk
Trump’s Evidence About Iran is “Dodgy” at Best
Yoav Litvin
Catch 2020 – Trump’s Authoritarian Endgame
Thomas Knapp
Opposition Research: It’s Not Trump’s Fault That Politics is a “Dirty” Game
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
U.S. Sanctions: Economic Sabotage that is Deadly, Illegal and Ineffective
Gary Leupp
Marx and Walking Zen
Thomas Hon Wing Polin
Color Revolution In Hong Kong: USA Vs. China
Howard Lisnoff
The False Prophets Cometh
Michael T. Klare
Bolton Wants to Fight Iran, But the Pentagon Has Its Sights on China
Steve Early
The Global Movement Against Gentrification
Dean Baker
The Wall Street Journal Doesn’t Like Rent Control
Tom Engelhardt
If Trump’s the Symptom, Then What’s the Disease?
June 17, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
The Dark Side of Brexit: Britain’s Ethnic Minorities Are Facing More and More Violence
Linn Washington Jr.
Remember the Vincennes? The US’s Long History of Provoking Iran
Geoff Dutton
Where the Wild Things Were: Abbey’s Road Revisited
Nick Licata
Did a Coverup of Who Caused Flint Michigan’s Contaminated Water Continue During Its Investigation? 
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Scales of Justice: Exceptions, Extraditions and Politics
John Feffer
Democracy Faces a Global Crisis
Louisa Willcox
Revamping Grizzly Bear Recovery
Stephen Cooper
“Wheel! Of! Fortune!” (A Vegas Story)
Daniel Warner
Let Us Laugh Together, On Principle
Brian Cloughley
Trump Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Weekend Edition
June 14, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Michael Hudson
Trump’s Trade Threats are Really Cold War 2.0
Bruce E. Levine
Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry
Jason Hirthler
Mainstream 101: Supporting Imperialism, Suppressing Socialism
T.J. Coles
How Much Do Humans Pollute? A Breakdown of Industrial, Vehicular and Household C02 Emissions
Andrew Levine
Whither The Trump Paradox?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of 10,000 Talkers, All With Broken Tongues
Pete Dolack
Look to U.S. Executive Suites, Not Beijing, For Why Production is Moved
Paul Street
It Can’t Happen Here: From Buzz Windrip and Doremus Jessup to Donald Trump and MSNBC
Rob Urie
Capitalism Versus Democracy
Richard Moser
The Climate Counter-Offensive: Secrecy, Deception and Disarming the Green New Deal
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail