FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

NY Times Delivers Weekend Scoop: Trump Did Not Fire Mueller in June

The original front page top headline on Friday’s New York Times (Jan. 26) was: “Trump Did Not Fire Mueller in June.”  The subheading was: “Also Trump did not fire Mueller in July, August, September, October, November, December or even January.”

You may be mystified by this, dear reader, since the headline you read, which was not the original but an altered version, was: “Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit.”  Now clearly that first part is not true, for if Trump had ordered Mueller fired, he would not be there now.  But Mueller is still rattling around the precincts of the Capital of Exceptionalism.

So obviously the correct version is; “Trump Did Not Fire Mueller in June.”  The claim that Trump “ordered” Mueller to be fired raises the question of what an “order” is.  And the answer according to the Times is that the “order” is something that has no effect.  Was “the order” a point of discussion or suggestion with the White House Attorney to whom it was allegedly issued?  What exactly was this “order” and where is its text.  An executive order must have a recorded text, but none is to be found or even claimed to exist by the Times.

So how did the original Times headline which we have obtained only with considerable sleuthing get altered?  All of the country outside Washington is abuzz with this question now.  In response to this growing curiosity our intrepid reporters have chased down the following story which is based on interviews with five anonymous sources who are all charter members of The DC Anonymous Sources Club over on D St.  They supplied us with the following transcript of a key exchange between Dean Baquet, Times executive editor, and Maggie Haberman, co-author of the story with Michael Schmidt:

Haberman (opening door to Bacquet’s office where he is alone yelling profanities at a picture of Trump pinned to a dart board): Dean, are you OK?

Baquet (sweating and flushed):  Maggie, you interrupted me during my daily Two Minutes of Hate.  Don’t ever, ever do that again!

Haberman:  But we already had the daily Two Minutes of Hate for the whole newsroom staff, including you, first thing this morning as usual.

Baquet: Maggie, I struggle to keep my edge here; it is hard to keep peddling this stuff every day and keep a straight face.  I need extra Hate minutes to keep me on track.

What do you want?

Haberman: You changed my headline and parts of the article!  What is up? You cannot go messing around with it too much.  We were already out on a limb with the spin I gave this piece. It is no surprise that the Pres. considered at many points firing Mueller as was his right under the Constitution.  He would be crazy were he not to have entertained ridding himself of a corrupt hatchet man nipping at his heels.  And it would have been equally crazy were he not to have consulted his lawyer on the matter.  So when I made it seem nefarious, that was really a stretch already.

Baquet:  You worry too much.

Haberman:  The part about the Counsel threatening to quit is really upsetting.  I could not find anything like that – no documentation whatsoever.  Who are those four anonymous sources?

Baquet:  Four?  I thought that I had only put in three.

Haberman: No, four.

Baquet:  I must have added some extras.

You know we are running into criticism for our use of anonymous sources.  When we made up two, that used to be enough to protect us. But nowadays I think it is better to have more – at least until the government or Google shuts down those dissident web sites.  Why, most of them even undercut our arguments for endless wars.  Scandalous.

Haberman:  Well, Dean, that was not so smart.  I may eventually have to dig up some people who are willing to say that they are the anonymous sources.  And the crew over at D St. will not do that.  So it will be very difficult for me.  And remember I have already been outed as a stenographer for the Clinton campaign, someone who would “tee up” stories for them, someone who “never disappointed.”  That already undercuts my reputation for objectivity. This is not very considerate of you, Dean.

Baquet:  Look Maggie.  I know how you feel, but you have to be a team player here.  You must know after the hard work you have put in these last two years, you are a top contender for the Judith Miller Prize for Creative Journalism.  You would not want to lose that, would you?

Haberman: OK. OK.

One other thing, Dean.  You have insisted we emphasize the “Trump Obstructing Justice” narrative.

Baquet:  That is not me, Maggie.  Mueller is on the phone insisting on that every day.  And he is a nasty SOB.  The FBI has a lot on me – my career would never survive his wrath.  So we will have to keep it up.

Haberman: But Dean, except for Democratic Party zealots, fewer people accept it with every passing day.  How can you have obstruction of justice without a crime?  And Mueller is getting to look absurd pursuing obstruction without naming the crime.  Look if I went to the police and told them that I want them to investigate my neighbor for covering up a crime, they would ask first what is the crime.  And if I said I did not know – yet- they would laugh me out of the station house.  In fact they might even try to have me committed.  How long can we pull this one off?

Baquet: Don’t worry about it. If anyone questions you and me, we will accuse them of being racists and sexists and therefore necessarily Trump supporters.  And we will get plenty of backing on that – especially from NPR.

But look, now that the Russian collusion narrative has collapsed, we gotta have something.  We have to press on.

Haberman (Dejected):  OK, Dean.

(She leaves looking downcast.)

Baquet (to himself):  Poor sucker.  If we get caught out in all this, we will need a fall guy – or gal.  She may be closer to the Judith Miller “prize” than she realizes.

Recording Ends.

Dear reader, if you question the validity of this recording, remember we have five anonymous sources who attest to its authenticity.  The Times only has four.

More articles by:

John V. Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar@gmail.com

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
February 28, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Rob Urie
Bernie Sanders and the Socialism Question
Vijay Prashad
Witnessing the Hell a Migrant Can Face
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Knives Out
Andrew Levine
Bloomberg: What Is He Good For?
T.J. Coles
The Space Force Becomes a Weapons System, Arms Companies Profit
Henry Giroux
Cult-Like Ignorance is Death: Trump and the Coronavirus
Paul Street
The So-Called Party of the People: From Nevada to South Carolina
Matthew Stevenson
Carolina and Super Tuesday on My Mind
Robert Hunziker
Forever-Chemicals Tap Water
Pete Dolack
No Thinking Please, We’re Red-Baiting
Nick Pemberton
If Bernie Sanders Is Unelectable, Then What The Hell Are The Rest Of You?
Jacob Hornberger
Immunity for Killings by Immigration Police
John Curiel – Jack R. Williams
Analysis of the 2019 Bolivia Election: No Evidence of Irregular Trends or Fraud
Ramzy Baroud
Israel at the Cusp of a Bleak Era
Ron Jacobs
Bloomberg’s Billionaire BS
Farzana Versey
Who Will Douse Delhi’s Flames?
Joseph Natoli
Dispelling the Darkness
Marshall Auerback
Boris Johnson, Not Donald Trump, is the Real Blue-Collar Conservative
Steve Early
VoteVets for Buttigieg:  Who’s Really Keeping Us in the Dark About Campaign Funding?
Thomas Knapp
Election 2020: Those Meddling Kids …
Arshad Khan
Trump Visits Modi and Delhi Erupts in Anti-Muslim Riots
Karen J. Greenberg
How Democracy Ends
Tom Clifford
Corona and Flu in Beijing: a Report From the Chinese Capital
Scott Tucker
Pete Buttigieg: The Energizer Bunny of Hegemony
Victor Grossman
Breakthroughs Against the Rightwing Menace in Germany
William Hartung
It’s Time to Debate Pentagon Spending
Seth Sandronsky
Struggling for Shelter: Resistance to California’s Housing Crisis Grows 
Daniel Warner
The UN, Homeostasis and China
Eve Ottenberg
Police Torture in Chicago
Kenn Orphan
The Ruling Class Will Stop at Nothing
Sean Reynolds
A Difficult Peace
W. T. Whitney
For the Climate: Protecting the Commons and Fixing Democracy
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange, Political Offences and Legal Restraints
Dedrick Asante-Muhammad – Jamie Buell
Does This Economy Work for Black Americans?
Tracey L. Rogers
Reflections on “Black Excellence”
Jill Richardson
Stop Calling Harmful Bigotry “Religious Freedom”
Barbara G. Ellis
Don’t Depend on FEMA to Save Us From Global-Warming’s Armageddon
Mike Garrity
Why We Sued Trump’s BLM Over Its Sagebrush-Juniper Burning Project in Montana
Christopher Brauchli
The Modi/Trump Anti-Muslim Alliance
John Kendall Hawkins
Science and the Turf Wars of Consciousness
John Peeler
Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism
Nicky Reid
Socialism Without Anti-Imperialism: A Different Flavor of Tyranny
Louis Proyect
Spies, Lies and Videotapes
David Yearsley
The Beef with Kobe
Andrew Stewart
How Netflix And “Manning Marable” Killed Malcolm X (The Third Time)
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail