The “China Threat”: an Undying Figment of the Western Imagination

Hong Kong.

Ever since it became clear — about 2.5 decades ago — that Deng Xiaoping’s epic reforms were going to succeed, the West has been relentlessly harping on “the Chinese threat.” That description long ago became a staple of Western mainstream media coverage of the world. The latest example of such brouhaha is the chorus of apparent anxiety that greeted the news that China had launched its first home-made aircraft carrier.

This ill-willed and dangerous obsession with “the China threat” not only flies in the face of actual developments during the period of the country’s contemporary renascence, but also against the historical record. Throughout its long history, there were many occasions during which China could have “taken over” the known world, but didn’t. A particularly notable example was during the early Ming Dynasty, in the 14th and 15th centuries, when Admiral Zheng He sailed all the way to Africa with ships dwarfing Columbus’s and a fleet many times the size of whatever the European power of the day, Spain, could muster. But China didn’t do colonialism. Plain not interested. At the height of its power, the Qing Dynasty spurned the pleas of Britain’s Lord McCartney to open China to international trade and contacts. Not interested. China just wanted to be left alone.

In the 21st century, of course, splendid isolation is no longer possible. China’s interests and contacts worldwide, mostly trade-driven, are expanding rapidly. That has led to ever-louder bleatings about “the Chinese threat” from the Western imperium. Yes, China is a challenge to the Empire’s longstanding, predatory domination of the world, if only by reducing the breadth and depth of the hegemony. But this, as Beijing has been both saying and doing, is largely through peaceful, economics-related means.

When it yells “China threat” and takes countervailing action, however, the Empire essentially means MILITARY threat. Could it be that those who run the Western imperium only understand force as the final arbiter of all things? (The storylines of Hollywood blockbusters would suggest so.) Is it a 21st-century version of the “Yellow Peril” scare last century that saw China and the Chinese denigrated and persecuted by and in the West?

Or is it that because all self-respecting Western powers had built empires during their ascendancy by pillaging, looting and colonizing other nations, they assume China would do the same in its own (re)ascendancy — despite the latter’s vastly different mindset, values and history? Simply a case of solipsism gone amuck, with potentially perilous consequences to all humanity? Is that the root of the West’s persistent and too-evident inability to understand China — and get along with it on a basis of equality?

The answers matter, because war and peace in our increasingly perilous times could depend on them.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
March 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Roberto J. González
The Mind-Benders: How to Harvest Facebook Data, Brainwash Voters, and Swing Elections
Paul Street
Deplorables II: The Dismal Dems in Stormy Times
Nick Pemberton
The Ghost of Hillary
Andrew Levine
Light at the End of the Tunnel?
Paul de Rooij
Amnesty International: Trumpeting for War… Again
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Coming in Hot
Chuck Gerhart
Sessions Exploits a Flaw to Pursue Execution of Meth Addicts
Robert Fantina
Distractions, Thought Control and Palestine
Hiroyuki Hamada
The Eyes of “Others” for Us All
Robert Hunziker
Is the EPA Hazardous to Your Health?
Stephanie Savell
15 Years After the Iraq Invasion, What Are the Costs?
Aidan O'Brien
Europe is Pregnant 
John Eskow
How Can We Live With All of This Rage?
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: Was Khe Sanh a Win or a Loss?
Dan Corjescu
The Man Who Should Be Dead
Howard Lisnoff
The Bone Spur in Chief
Brian Cloughley
Hitler and the Poisoning of the British Public
Brett Wilkins
Trump Touts $12.5B Saudi Arms Sale as US Support for Yemen War Literally Fuels Atrocities
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Iraqi Landscapes: the Path of Martyrs
Brian Saady
The War On Drugs Is Far Deadlier Than Most People Realize
Stephen Cooper
Battling the Death Penalty With James Baldwin
CJ Hopkins
Then They Came for the Globalists
Philip Doe
In Colorado, See How They Run After the Fracking Dollars
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Armed Propaganda
Binoy Kampmark
John Brennan’s Trump Problem
Nate Terani
Donald Trump’s America: Already Hell Enough for This Muslim-American
Steve Early
From Jackson to Richmond: Radical Mayors Leave Their Mark
Jill Richardson
To Believe in Science, You Have to Know How It’s Done
Ralph Nader
Ten Million Americans Could Bring H.R. 676 into Reality Land—Relief for Anxiety, Dread and Fear
Sam Pizzigati
Billionaires Won’t Save the World, Just Look at Elon Musk
Sergio Avila
Don’t Make the Border a Wasteland
Daryan Rezazad
Denial of Climate Change is Not the Problem
Ron Jacobs
Flashing for the Refugees on the Unarmed Road of Flight
Missy Comley Beattie
The Age of Absurdities and Atrocities
George Wuerthner
Isle Royale: Manage for Wilderness Not Wolves
George Payne
Pompeo Should Call the Dogs Off of WikiLeaks
Russell Mokhiber
Study Finds Single Payer Viable in 2018 Elections
Franklin Lamb
Despite Claims, Israel-Hezbollah War is Unlikely
Montana Wilderness Association Dishonors Its Past
Elizabeth “Liz” Hawkins, RN
Nurses Are Calling #TimesUp on Domestic Abuse
Paul Buhle
A Caribbean Giant Passes: Wilson Harris, RIP
Mel Gurtov
A Blank Check for Repression? A Saudi Leader Visits Washington
Seth Sandronsky
Hoop schemes: Sacramento’s corporate bid for an NBA All-Star Game
Louis Proyect
The French Malaise, Now and Then
David Yearsley
Bach and the Erotics of Spring