FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Trump’s Muslim Ban: Another Symptom of the War on Terror

Photo by thierry ehrmann | CC BY 2.0

Photo by thierry ehrmann | CC BY 2.0

 

On January 28, President Trump signed an executive order denying entry for 90 days to the United States for individuals from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Somalia. A spokeswoman from the Department of Homeland Security told Reuters the ban would prevent people from banned countries who are green card holders from returning to the United States if they travel abroad. Trump defended the order, claiming, “it’s not a Muslim ban,” but in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network he noted Christian refugees would receive priority in resettlement process. The Huffington Post reported there have been no fatal terror attacks in the United States committed by immigrants from the seven countries banned.

Protests erupted at major airports across the country in response to the ban. The ban, rather than an anomaly induced by Trump’s presidency, was enabled by a long campaign of misinformation and a destructive U.S. foreign policy predicated on fears over terrorism since 9/11. These misconceptions were manipulated to manufacture support for the Iraq War, and increase U.S. intervention, weapons exports, and bombing campaigns throughout the Middle East. Despite a congressional inquiry suggesting the Saudi Arabian government supported the 9/11 hijackers and helped fund terrorist organizations, Saudi Arabia’s prominent status as allies and wealthy business partners with America’s political elite and their donors have inoculated them from being targeted under the “war on terror.” Instead a broader, sweeping generalization has blanketed all Muslims and the countries where Muslims make up large portions of the population as terrorists. Funding has been poured into military, defense, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement under the pretenses of fighting terrorism, leading to a hysteria of Islamophobia and an abundance of illegal activities conducted by our own government.

The illegal prison in Guantanamo Bay was opened under the pretenses of the war on terror, but the files whistleblower Chelsea Manning leaked revealed many of its prisoners, referred to officially as detainees due to the prison violating the Geneva Convention, were innocent or low-level offenders.

Manning revealed the war crimes the U.S. military were committing in Iraq and getting away with in the name of the war on terror. Torture and indiscriminate killings of civilians were commonplace, under a “shoot first, ask questions later,” mentality. Manning also revealed U.S. military contractors acting complicit or participating in illegal child trafficking. Rather than inhibit terrorism and promote peace, the Iraq War and the atrocities committed in it fueled unrest in the Middle East, all while placing the blame for perpetual warfare on the pervasive threat of terrorism.

Edward Snowden risked his life and livelihood to reveal the NSA’s illegal mass surveillance program, violating privacy rights of every American citizen, foreign national, and foreign leaders, all under the veil of fighting terrorism. Despite the revelations, Snowden has widely been vilified for exposing these secrets, while Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who committed perjury in front of congress before Snowden’s leak, was provided with impunity. Clapper, it is important to note, oversaw satellite imagery operations searching for WMDs in Iraq while the Bush Administration dragged the United States into war under false information.

Several media outlets, from the GuardianNew York Times, and the Intercept have covered cases where the FBI has manufactured terrorism plots. Entrapment and unethical use of informants have been used to arrest individuals involved in terrorism plots set up by the FBI. The motives of manufacturing these plots have boosted the image of the FBI in the war on terror, provided corroborating evidence for increased or sustained funding to the FBI’s terror programs, sustained fear of terrorism, and provided politicians from both political parties to exploit the arrests made from these cases as evidence they supported the war on terror, that these campaigns were being successful, and that despite the perceived continuous threats, the current political power hierarchy had everything under control.

Between 2002 and 2011, NSEER, the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System, acted as a registry database for Muslims, treating all Muslims as suspects or accomplices in the war on terror. The no-fly list swelled from 16 individuals to 47,000 since 9/11, many of which have been overt instances of discrimination against Muslims. Both Republicans and Democrats have perpetuated this discrimination and the use of this list and similar watch lists secretly constructed by government agencies, which have included babies listed.

A vicious cycle of interventionist foreign policy has created political vacuums and instability in the Middle East for terrorist groups to thrive in. This perpetual warfare enables politicians to continue fear mongering to the public.

Barack Obama ran on campaign promises to promote peace and ease tensions and unrest in the Middle East. Under the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton’s service as Secretary of State, weapons exports to countries in the Middle East, like Saudi Arabia, exponentially increased. Those weapons in turn have been used to commit human rights atrocities in Yemen. Weapons exports more than doubled under the Obama Administration compared to the Bush Administration. U.S. bombing campaigns increased to seven countries. The Obama Administration embraced the highly controversial use of drone strikes, increasingly relying on it despite the lack of oversight and accountability for the program killing civilians instead of intended targets.

The war on terror’s record has really been a war on the Middle East. In that war, Muslims, Arabs and anyone who can be categorized into the stereotypical archetype of a terrorist have often been victimized, attacked, discriminated against, or killed in the name of fighting terrorism. Trump’s recent ban on Muslims from seven Muslim countries is a symptom of this ongoing war used to justify horrible things.

More articles by:

Michael Sainato’s writing has appeared in the Guardian, Miami Herald, Baltimore Sun, Denver Post, Buffalo News, the Hill, Alternet, and several other publications . Follow him on twitter: @MSainat1

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
Jefferson Morley
On JFK, Tulsi Gabbard Keeps Very Respectable Company
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up for Left Literature: In India, It Can Cost You Your Life
Gary Leupp
Bloomberg Versus Bernie: The Upcoming Battle?
Ron Jacobs
The Young Lords: Luchadores Para La Gente
Richard Klin
Loss Leaders
Gaither Stewart
Roma: How Romans Differ From Europeans
Kerron Ó Luain
The Soviet Century
Mike Garrity
We Can Fireproof Homes But Not Forests
Fred Baumgarten
Gaslighting Bernie and His Supporters
Joseph Essertier
Our First Amendment or Our Empire, But Not Both
Peter Linebaugh
A Story for the Anthropocene
Danny Sjursen
Where Have You Gone Smedley Butler?
Jill Richardson
A Broken Promise to Teachers and Nonprofit Workers
Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission for Julian Assange
Wade Sikorski
Oil or Food? Notes From a Farmer Who Doesn’t Think Pipelines are Worth It
Christopher Brauchli
The Politics of Vengeance
Hilary Moore – James Tracy
No Fascist USA! Lessons From a History of Anti-Klan Organizing
Linn Washington Jr.
Ridiculing MLK’s Historic Garden State ‘Firsts’
L. Michael Hager
Evaluating the Democratic Candidates: the Importance of Integrity
Jim Goodman
Bloomberg Won’t, as They Say, Play Well in Peoria, But Then Neither Should Trump
Olivia Alperstein
We Need to Treat Nuclear War Like the Emergency It Is
Jesse Jackson
Kerner Report Set Standard for What a Serious Presidential Candidate Should Champion
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Home Sweet Home: District Campaign Financing
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Latest BLM Hoodwinkery: “Fuel Breaks” in the Great Basin
Wendell Griffen
Grace and Gullibility
Nicky Reid
Hillary, Donald & Bernie: Three Who Would Make a Catastrophe
David Yearsley
Dresden 75
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail