FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Donald Trump vs. Sadiq Khan

Donald Trump is on the record calling for the ban of all Muslims entering the United States until U.S. representatives can figure out what is going on.  London’s new Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, says Trump is ignorant about Islam and assures that mainstream Islam and Western liberal values are compatible.

So what do the words “Muslim” and “mainstream Islam” mean to Trump and Khan?

While Trump has said that many of his Muslim friends agree with his plan to block all Muslims from entering the United States, Khan contends that mainstream Islam does not pose a threat to the West.

Although Khan is correct that the majority of Muslims are peaceful and not dangerous, the issue needs to be carefully examined to avoid confusion as there is a difference between Islam and Islamism.

Islamists follow Islamism.  They have an orthodox understanding of the Koran and believe that all of its verses apply in the 21st century. The Islamists have submitted to the teaching of the Islamic ideology and reject all other ideologies. This orthodox understanding breeds sharia. 

– amputation of the hands of thieves

– crucifixion

– stoning of adulterers

– flogging for drinking alcohol or fornication

– punishment for homosexuals      

– beating women to force them to have sex

– extorting tribute money from non-Muslims

– honor killing

A mainstream Muslim would reject the orthodox interpretation of Islam and would not adhere to the above commands. If a Muslim believes these practices should be implimented, then he or she is not a mainstream Muslim but rather is an Islamist. It is safe to say that most Westerners would agree that if someone believes in the implementation of these severe actions, they should not be welcome as a new member of a civilized society, as they could pose a threat to that society.

The question here is whether Khan believes in the validity of these verses in the 21st century.  Trump obviously assumes that Khan rejects these verses, as he told the media that there are always exceptions and he hoped that Khan would succeed.  But assuming mainstream Islam is compatible with Western values, and Muslims respect the rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and federal law, such as the rights of non-Muslims, gays, and feminists, and also respect freedom of speech and freedom of religion, then nobody should block their entrance to the United States.

Ghasem Akbari is a certified Sharia lawyer and Islamic expert for the Supreme Court of Iran, and an adjunct professor of law at St. Mary’s University in the United States. He is also the author of two books and numerous articles. Maria Sliwa is an adjunct assistant professor of Media Law at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism @MariaSliwa

Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
David Yearsley
Bollocks to Brexit: the Plumber Sings
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail