FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Ebola Quarantine Policy as Libertarianism

Privatization of the mind: in the face of a viral disease with the potential for (i.e., capable of) spreading to pandemic proportions, anything that smacks of the communal good trumping individuals’ presumed rights is anathema, lest it Collectivize America and raise the Specter of Russia and China. Cuomo and Christie, to their everlasting shame, backed down from common-sense policies of health management in addressing contagious disease. America is choking in its rigidified IDEOLOGICAL fear, here, a ramped up anticommunism evolved into counterterrorism, acutely alert to, and necessarily screening out, anything that opposes and refers back ultimately to what we might call Market Fundamentalism, an inadequate designation for the pathologies of unrestrained capitalism. A mouthful? Sure. But how else sound the tocsin of capitulation to a political leadership, viz., the Obama administration, so profoundly corrupt in wanting approval that it uses the flimsy pretext of, “We don’t want to discourage health workers from going to Africa to treat Ebola patients,” as cover for: We are the prideful, Exceptional nation and people who represent an uncontaminated capitalism in a hostile world against forces (Obama personally linked Ebola, terrorism, and Russia as threats to the Homeland—a xenophobic/ethnocentric term if ever there was one) whose sole purpose is to do us in.

This hodge-podge of planned confusion emanating from the White House and forcing the Cuomo-Christie retreat (singly and together, never much for articulating resistance to American Corporatism, i.e., fascism) places the people’s health hostage to an absolutist Individualism that plays well from Wall Street to Peoria while defying the essence of quarantine policy throughout the ages: Safeguarding the public’s health is NOT a trespass on civil liberties! Even ACLU falls into line, fearful of the avalanche of right-wing thinking in America which, as in the case of the nurse temporarily confined to an isolation setting in New Jersey, questions any restraint on human conduct as the most heinous of constitutional crimes. Good. Fine. Those of us—and I admit to being practically alone on this—who see America as the principal threat to world peace, as swimming in a sea of War Crimes, as going through the widest disparity of income and wealth in American history (The Times reported recently on a $90M condo in NYC), believe the nation properly deserves its fate wherein irredeemable stubbornness and arrogance on behalf of the Property Right has sunk political consciousness to rock-bottom self-indulgence, ready to fight the world over its arrogation of unilateral global hegemony.

I commented yesterday on Putin’s wise address to the Valdai Discussion Club, and was glad to see that CP published its text for all to judge; his emphasis therein on a “new version of interdependence,” not with Ebola in mind, but the larger breakdown of World Civilization, nevertheless implicitly sets priorities right in a common struggle against the fallacies of a unipolar world, and by extension, in microcosm, the politicized, irresponsible conduct/dogma of individualistic grandeur incapable of protecting the rights of the community. Communal rights writ large make up an harmonious world, something America regards as anathema. Perhaps Ebola will somehow be a blessing in disguise (were it not for the myriad innocent victims!) teaching us that antecedent principles of human welfare must trump the visceral opportunism we are seeing today. By all means, from governors to CDC officials to, now, the media, all of whom have bought into the Free-Enterprise racket, retreat in the face of White House pressure is understandable. (Why not, you are all wallowing in the same ideological manure pile?) Meanwhile, Obama and Company are dancing to the music of the capitalistic spheres and have left public-health considerations far behind.

Ebola might well be contained under the present regimen, but the regimen—voluntary, non-institutional quarantine—may be as deadly as the virus itself, or at least inextricably tied to it, from the standpoint of all sorts of diseases, medical and political, coming down the pike. In times of plague, whether potential or real, just as in times of privatization run amuck, strewing bodies around in another form of misery, the defense of the community, at whatever level, from local to global, takes precedence in any sort of moral order that values human life above mere wealth and power. But of course, when wealth and power become equated with moral order, what I am saying is pure nonsense. Looking around now, the overwhelming consensus in America is that it is. Putin’s “new version of interdependence” will find little favor here.

My New York Times Comment on Matt Flegenheimer, et. al., “Under Pressure, Cuomo Says Ebola Quarantines Can Be Spent at Home,” (Oct. 27), follows:

Obama’s opposition to the mandatory quarantine smacks of political correctness, a play to the Libertarian crowd. Of course, sound science MAY be in his favor; yet Dr. Spencer’s case suggests otherwise, particularly, even with the best of intentions, one cannot fully know about the incubation stage until too late.

Why the sudden concern about mandatory quarantine when Obama personally authorizes drone assassination on a frequent basis, or other signs of Executive indifference to civil liberties? Sheer hypocrisy, if not worse–the deliberate effort to appear humane to the world as a p.r. stunt, meanwhile potentially putting the American public at risk.

More phony politicization of important matters at the hands of this administration. Should outbreaks occur, Obama should be handed his walking papers–a crass politician indifferent to everything but his own public image.

Norman Pollack has written on Populism. His interests are social theory and the structural analysis of capitalism and fascism. He can be reached at pollackn@msu.edu.

More articles by:

Norman Pollack Ph.D. Harvard, Guggenheim Fellow, early writings on American Populism as a radical movement, prof., activist.. His interests are social theory and the structural analysis of capitalism and fascism. He can be reached at pollackn@msu.edu.

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers Strike: Black Smoke Pouring Out of LAUSD Headquarters
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail