Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Respect for the Law?

It is often said that a civilized society cannot live without laws. The absence of laws supposedly leads to the law of the jungle or “Lord of the Flies” scenarios. In theory, the courts enforce the laws and dispense justice, which should mean not only upholding the laws but being just. In order for the courts to retain moral authority, the laws have to be fair and applied equally to all. This always involves a balancing act for if the laws are not fairly applied to all citizens, the people lose respect for the justice system.

When I was growing up the nuns taught me to revere the U.S. Supreme Court. What it said was the law of the land; the nuns reasoned that the justices had to be objective because they had life time appointments. But, as I grew up the contradictions became glaring, and I realized that the Supremes were only separated by one degree from members of the mafia. Evidently, many Americans have reached the same conclusion, and the Supreme Court’s approval rating has fallen to 44 percent and plunging.

We always knew that the justices were conservative, but we believed that they tried to be fair. This confidence has been eroded by the irrational outbursts of Antonin Scalia who gives no pretense that he gives a damn what people think. Some of my colleagues excuse him, and say the he is a right winger but that he has a brilliant legal mind. But, so did the flat earth people, and they kept the people in the Dark Ages for hundreds of years.

Because most people today are educated and some actually think, more and more people are questioning the Supremes. They are concluding that justices and the nation’s lawmakers don’t care about the law, and that they are making a mockery of the saying that no man is above the law.

The Supremes care only about themselves. They don’t have the welfare of the people or the nation in mind, and they could care less about the poor. Most of the Supremes care only about serving their own class interests, protecting their investments and keeping their family members in cushy jobs.

The lawmakers are not far behind.  They don’t legislate, and when they do they reflect the biases of special interests groups that are paying them bag money.

How many laws have the so-called lawmakers passed in the past eight years? Like Nero supposedly let Rome burn, the lawmakers are letting the country burn.

No doubt that we need cops; no doubt there are bad people in this world; but should we tell our children to blindly respect the police and the courts? I concede that without the police there would be total anarchy, and the thugs would threaten our safety. However, what price are we willing to pay? Do we really feel more secure because the NSA is bugging the world?

I wonder if the parents that forty years ago told their children to have blind trust in their priest would do so today.

Americans take pride in the fact that they don’t live in a Moslem country where a religious elite keep people in the Dark Ages. They forget about our own religious zealots that seek to impose their morality on the rest of us. They point to the dictatorships in Latin America forgetting that most of them were educated, trained and paid by the United States.

I do not deny that there should be respect for legitimate laws, but respect has to be earned. In 2000 Gore v. Bush stole the presidency.  In 2010, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Court in a 5-4 decision held that “No sufficient governmental interest justifies limits on the political speech (including bribery of public officials) of corporations.” This is chicanery at its worse and anyone who respects the decisions is a fool.

The decisions of the Supreme Court are not based on logic but on sophistry. The Supremes justify bribery. A majority collaborate with the Republican Party in the suppressing the right of minorities to vote. The judges do this with impunity.

The Supremes are supposed to avoid the appearance of impropriety:  Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct says that “A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment. A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.”

Good luck!  Justice Antonin Scalia and his wife, Maureen, flaunt the rule and appear at right wing functions hosted by corporate crooks like the Koch Brothers. Scalia has received honorariums for speaking at these events, and he obsequiously caters to the rich for bigger kickbacks.

Scalia and at least two other justices have been criticized for the appearance of impropriety.  Justice Clarence Thomas attends exclusive events at private resorts that are orchestrated again by the billionaire oil barons Charles and David Koch.

Justice Thomas has accepted gifts of travel on the private jets of billionaire Harlan Crow.  His wife, Ginny Thomas is a Republican Party bagman who has benefited from Court decisions.  She is actively building a Tea Party network that she works for as a lobbyist.

Mrs. Thomas was an aide to former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, and was a staff member of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the reactionary Heritage Foundation.

Meanwhile, Justice Samuel Alito who is rude to his colleagues is a headline speaker at right wing fundraisers, namely the Manhattan Institute, a creature of right-wing think tanks such as Exxon and CIGNA.

The saying that no one is above the law is a joke. Justices Thomas, Scalia, and Alito flagrantly violate all ethical norms and the get away with it while some poor joker with a couple of ounces of marijuana is sent away.

This critique does not include the damage that the Supremes are doing to the nation.  They are crooks and they get away with it. Worse they are spreading scandal; their actions are similar to those of pedophile priests who have damaged the credibility of many good priests and adherents.

If you are honest with yourself, there is little hope that the system will correct itself. But the truth be told, we all in some manner contribute to the burning of Rome. We work for the institutions that rationalize the myth that no man is above the law. We listen to news programs knowing that what we to listen are lies.

I educate people for a living, hoping that I will help make a difference. I have helped thousands to become professionals, knowing that they will encourage blind respect for authority that ultimately keeps the Scalias, the Alitos, the Thomases and other scumbags in office.

My remarks are not meant to offend anyone. I am just ruminating, an art that has been lost. Education today is propaganda, and it does not tolerate reflection.

I love my students dearly and take pride in their achievements. However, they have become professionals, and as good professionals they have to move up. Recently, I came across posts on Facebook from former students and friends, posing with our current political savior.

They refer to themselves as members of Team [Eric] Garcetti, the mayor of Los Angeles. They take pride in being part of the inner circle.While I concede that they have accomplished a great deal, traveling from los de abajo to city hall in one generation. However, they delude themselves into thinking that they are doing it for the people.

If they don’t want to be part of problem, my advice to them is to ruminate – that is what we used to call an examination of conscience.

RODOLFO ACUÑA, a professor emeritus at California State University Northridge, has published 20 books and over 200 public and scholarly articles. He is the founding chair of the first Chicano Studies Dept which today offers 166 sections per semester in Chicano Studies. His history book Occupied America has been banned in Arizona. In solidarity with Mexican Americans in Tucson, he has organized fundraisers and support groups to ground zero and written over two dozen articles exposing efforts there to nullify the U.S. Constitution.

More articles by:

RODOLFO ACUÑA, a professor emeritus at California State University Northridge, has published 20 books and over 200 public and scholarly articles. He is the founding chair of the first Chicano Studies Dept which today offers 166 sections per semester in Chicano Studies. His history book Occupied America has been banned in Arizona. In solidarity with Mexican Americans in Tucson, he has organized fundraisers and support groups to ground zero and written over two dozen articles exposing efforts there to nullify the U.S. Constitution.

October 22, 2018
Henry Giroux
Neoliberalism in the Age of Pedagogical Terrorism
Melvin Goodman
Washington’s Latest Cold War Maneuver: Pulling Out of the INF
David Mattson
Basket of Deplorables Revisited: Grizzly Bears at the Mercy of Wyoming
Michelle Renee Matisons
Hurricane War Zone Further Immiserates Florida Panhandle, Panama City
Tom Gill
A Storm is Brewing in Europe: Italy and Its Public Finances Are at the Center of It
Suyapa Portillo Villeda
An Illegitimate, US-Backed Regime is Fueling the Honduran Refugee Crisis
Christopher Brauchli
The Liars’ Bench
Gary Leupp
Will Trump Split the World by Endorsing a Bold-Faced Lie?
Michael Howard
The New York Times’ Animal Cruelty Fetish
Alice Slater
Time Out for Nukes!
Geoff Dutton
Yes, Virginia, There are Conspiracies—I Think
Daniel Warner
Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question
Priti Gulati Cox – Stan Cox
Mothers of Exiles: For Many, the Child-Separation Ordeal May Never End
Manuel E. Yepe
Pence v. China: Cold War 2.0 May Have Just Begun
Raouf Halaby
Of Pith Helmets and Sartorial Colonialism
Dan Carey
Aspirational Goals  
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail