FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Hell, No, Harry Won’t Go!

How fitting that England’s Prince Harry won’t be sent to Iraq with the rest of his regiment, despite his request to go. Commanding officers have pulled him from the ranks, citing concern that insurgents have targeted him specially, which would endanger him and the troops (bodyguards?) around him.

According to the news report, Harry remains dedicated to his military career. I’m not sure how he will ever be able to serve as an infantry officer, given these special risks. The same goes for Prince William, who’s also in the army. Send these men to flight school or submarine school, where they will be forever safe from “insurgents.”

How different is our world from that of Harry’s royal forebears! Many British royals fought right up front, sword in hand, suffering the slings and arrows of their enemy. King Harold famously took an arrow in the eye at Hastings. Shakespeare’s King Henry gave us the “Once more unto the breach, dear friends,” battle cry. These men were also specifically targeted by the enemy. More, they were actual kings, not third-in-line-for-the-throne princes ­ and they weren’t mere figureheads.

But give Harry credit for at least trying to give ’em Hell (unless his initial request was mere royal theatre). He’s shown more sense of duty than the Bush twin daughters (except when he’s partying in his Nazi uniform), who seem blissfully unaware they’re needed in a distant land. The Bush twins gave their bodies when it was time to campaign for Daddy in 2004, using their sex appeal to excite College Republicans, so why not now? After all, the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign emphatically supported the war and occupation. And the twins cannot have missed hearing their down-in-the-polls dad talk about Iraq, and how important it is that the U.S. succeed there (whatever that means). Ditto for Cheney’s daughters. Both Elizabeth, who now works at the State Department, and Mary did their share of shilling for Daddy Dick in the 2004 campaign.

Shouldn’t the Bush daughters at least join the National Guard like their father, who flew obsolete jets to weasel out of Vietnam? Wait: Much of today’s Guard is in Iraq The twins could at least join Halliburton, so they may serve, albeit in luxury, on cost-plus contracts at taxpayer (read: our) expense. As for the Cheney daughters, it looks like they have “other priorities,” just like their armchair warrior dad during Vietnam. Correction: Army regulations would prohibit Mary from serving even if she wanted to, because she’s openly gay.

Forget presidential progeny. What about the folks who still sport “Bush-Cheney 2004” bumper stickers or “Support the Troops” yellow ribbons? Why aren’t they clamoring to go to Iraq? Presumably, they aren’t all openly gay. The absence of these pom-pom boys and girls in Iraq is all the more glaring given that the Army complains about troop shortages and has even upped its age limit to 42.

Apparently, war is not for everyone. It’s not for royals, anymore. It’s certainly not for presidents’ and vice presidents’ kids. It’s not for regular voters and working stiffs. It’s for “the troops.”

Since Congress has lacked the brains and the balls to cut off the president’s line of credit (this Daddy’s war bucks are borrowed ), the next spending bill for Iraq should include nixing any age limit for the Army. After all, most military jobs are non-combat roles. Even octogenarians can help.

Call this new generation of experienced recruits “Generation Ex,” or “Generation Why Not?”

The Army would need new approach in its recruiting ads. Here’s a slogan, from none other than General Douglas MacArthur: “Old soldiers never die, they just fade away.”

See, there’s no real danger, old soldiers-to-be! You never die! Add a soundtrack (classic rock) and images of purposeful yet cheerful, desert-camo-clad men and women (the playful Bush twins?) wearing pistols, driving Humvees, reviewing intelligence, building spreadsheets, fixing computers, writing reports, and crunching numbers . The commercials could even instruct that Boot Camp benefits saggy abs and doddering libidos.

The pitch wouldn’t be any more deceptive than traditional military ads that prey on teenagers.

If Congress won’t get pro-war oldsters to step up and keeps “supporting” our troops by keeping them in Iraq, then Army recruiters will just have to dig deeper and deceive our children further. Sergeant Joe Camel, anyone?

BRIAN J. FOLEY can be reached at brian_j_foley@yahoo.com

Visit his primitive website at www.brianjfoley.com

 

 

 

More articles by:

Brian J. Foley is a lawyer and the author of A New Financial You in 28 Days! A 37-Day Plan (Gegensatz Press). Contact him at brian_j_foley@yahoo.com.

July 17, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Trump & The Big Bad Bugs
Robert Hunziker
Trump Kills Science, Nature Strikes Back
John Grant
The Politics of Cruelty
Kenneth Surin
Calculated Buffoonery: Trump in the UK
Binoy Kampmark
Helsinki Theatrics: Trump Meets Putin
Patrick Bond
BRICS From Above, Seen Critically From Below
Jim Kavanagh
Fighting Fake Stories: The New Yorker, Israel and Obama
Daniel Falcone
Chomsky on the Trump NATO Ruse
W. T. Whitney
Oil Underground in Neuquén, Argentina – and a New US Military Base There
Doug Rawlings
Ken Burns’ “The Vietnam War” was Nominated for an Emmy, Does It Deserve It?
Rajan Menon
The United States of Inequality
Thomas Knapp
Have Mueller and Rosenstein Finally Gone Too Far?
Cesar Chelala
An Insatiable Salesman
Dean Baker
Truth, Trump and the Washington Post
Mel Gurtov
Human Rights Trumped
Binoy Kampmark
Putin’s Football Gambit: How the World Cup Paid Off
July 16, 2018
Sheldon Richman
Trump Turns to Gaza as Middle East Deal of the Century Collapses
Charles Pierson
Kirstjen Nielsen Just Wants to Protect You
Brett Wilkins
The Lydda Death March and the Israeli State of Denial
Patrick Cockburn
Trump Knows That the US Can Exercise More Power in a UK Weakened by Brexit
Robert Fisk
The Fisherman of Sarajevo Told Tales Past Wars and Wars to Come
Gary Leupp
When Did Russia Become an Adversary?
Uri Avnery
“Not Enough!”
Dave Lindorff
Undermining Trump-Putin Summit Means Promoting War
Manuel E. Yepe
World Trade War Has Begun
Binoy Kampmark
Trump Stomps Britain
Wim Laven
The Best Deals are the Deals that Develop Peace
Kary Love
Can We Learn from Heinrich Himmler’s Daughter? Should We?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Franklin Lamb, Requiescat in Pace
Weekend Edition
July 13, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Brian Cloughley
Lessons That Should Have Been Learned From NATO’s Destruction of Libya
Paul Street
Time to Stop Playing “Simon Says” with James Madison and Alexander Hamilton
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of Formula and Honey
Aidan O'Brien
Ireland’s Intellectuals Bow to the Queen of Chaos 
Michael Collins
The Affirmative Action Silo
Andrew Levine
Tipping Points
Geoff Dutton
Fair and Balanced Opinion at the New York Times
Ajamu Baraka
Cultural and Ideological Struggle in the US: a Final Comment on Ocasio-Cortez
David Rosen
The New McCarthyism: Is the Electric Chair Next for the Left?
Ken Levy
The McConnell Rule: Nasty, Brutish, and Unconstitutional
George Wuerthner
The Awful Truth About the Hammonds
Robert Fisk
Will Those Killed by NATO 19 Years Ago in Serbia Ever Get Justice?
Robert Hunziker
Three Climatic Monsters with Asteroid Impact
Ramzy Baroud
Europe’s Iron Curtain: The Refugee Crisis is about to Worsen
Nick Pemberton
A Letter For Scarlett JoManDaughter
Marilyn Garson
Netanyahu’s War on Transcendence 
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail