FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Chamberlain v. White Plains: A Crack in the Wall for Police Killings?

Photograph of Kenneth Chamberlain Sr. – Public Domain

On Monday, June 1, the U.S. Second Circuit in New York substantially reversed a district court’s ruling on appeal in the case of the police killing of Kenneth Chamberlain, Sr., in which the lower court had found mainly for the defendants.

Amid the turmoil and horror of the George Floyd and Breanna Taylor murders, the 50-page opinion in Chamberlain v. City of White Plains provides a glimmer of hope that justice may ultimately be served in this case of extrajudicial killing. Imagine: Could justice for one be justice for all?

To be sure, a long and winding legal road lies ahead for the plaintiff, Chamberlain’s son, Kenneth Jr. For now, the circuit court has remanded key parts of the case back to the district court for further proceedings. The defendants–including Officer Anthony Carelli, who delivered the fatal gunshots to Chamberlain, and six other officers who had a hand in the incident—may reargue the same or different points in seeking summary judgment, or the case may eventually go back to trial. Alternatively, the city could offer to settle. Unless that happens, hoped-for justice could be years away.

To read the decision by Judges Robert D. Sack and Peter W. Hall is to revisit the details of a horrific hour-long assault and execution that almost makes Floyd’s death seem incidental—not that it was. In the early morning hours of November 19, 2011, the 68-year-old Chamberlain, African American, a Vietnam veteran and retired correctional officer, accidentally set off his “Life Aid” emergency medical-alert pager. White Plains police and an ambulance were dispatched to Chamberlain’s city-owned apartment. What unfolded next was a chain of escalating tensions fueled by police arrogance and racial bias. At one point recordings of the incident detect an officer referring to Chamberlain using the N-word, although the defendants dispute this interpretation.

Despite being given information—not least of all by Chamberlain himself, as well as by a Life Aid operator, Chamberlain’s niece, who was in the hallway outside the apartment, and his sister, who was on the phone from North Carolina–that Chamberlain was not in need of assistance and had accidentally triggered his device, the cops decided sometime not long after arriving that they would get into the apartment, no matter what. They banged on his door loudly and made threats about having to break down the door if Chamberlain wouldn’t let them in. They called for backup and got a dozen officers in SWAT gear. When they used a crowbar-like tool to pry open the door a few inches, Chamberlain repeatedly stuck a cooking knife through the opening to try to keep them away. All the while, Chamberlain was shouting for his life, shouting at the police to leave, that he didn’t need help, that it was his home and he didn’t want them inside, that they were there to kill him. And so they were.

After an hour, within moments of tearing the apartment door off its hinges, the officers tased him, shot him with a beanbag shotgun, and then administered the fatal shots with a handgun. Their ludicrous defense for the final act was that Chamberlain, who had mental and medical issues, sprung back after being felled by the beanbag pellets and charged them.

Although focused on legal issues rather than settling questions of fact and evidence, the Second Circuit decision left few details to the imagination, and, reading between the lines, was unsparing in its criticism of the police officers’ actions. The most important legal issues revolved around (1) whether the police potentially violated Chamberlain’s Fourth Amendment rights by forcing their way into his apartment, (2) whether the police were entitled to “qualified immunity,” and (3) the use of excessive force.

On the first point, the defendants had argued that “exigent circumstances”—that is, their belief that Chamberlain was in imminent danger (not from themselves, mind you!) and needed emergency assistance—made their entry necessary. The Second Circuit would have none of it:

“[W]e conclude that a reasonable, experienced officer would not have determined there was probable cause to believe that Chamberlain needed urgent medical attention. The officers outside of his apartment knew that the Life Alert system had been activated accidentally. The Life Aid operator informed the police dispatcher that Chamberlain was not in need of medical assistance. And Chamberlain himself firmly and repeatedly informed the officers that he had not called for help and was not in need of assistance of any kind, let alone urgent medical aid.” [Emphasis added.]

“Despite Chamberlain’s rising anxiety about the officers’ presence and aggressive actions, the officers escalated the confrontation by making derisive comments and by declining to permit or arrange for Chamberlain to speak with members of his immediate family,” the judges wrote.

“And when, eventually, the officers entered Chamberlain’s apartment, they did so not with a gurney and paramedics, or other equipment or personnel related to a possible health emergency, but with a Taser, a beanbag shotgun, and handguns. Instead of treating Chamberlain as a critically ill patient, the officers acted as though he were a criminal suspect.”

Thus, the court firmly rejected the “exigent” argument and opened the door to allowing the case to be argued, in future proceedings, that an illegal, unwarranted entry took place in violation of Chamberlain’s Fourth Amendment rights.

In the district court, the defendants had prevailed on the question of qualified immunity, essentially giving a pass to the cops’ actions; in the judges’ words, qualified immunity “reflects the recognition that, in order to ensure public safety, police officers require sufficient protection to enable them to perform their duties without fear of unwarranted private litigation.” Partly on procedural grounds, and also citing the first part of the decision, the Circuit Court reversed the prior decision.

The finding on unlawful entry also informed the judges’ decision on the third issue, the use of excessive force, specifically limited to the use of the beanbag shotgun. (The question of the fatal gunshots was not argued in this appeal.) Because of both the potential Fourth Amendment violation and the court’s rejection of the qualified immunity argument, the judges ruled that the issue of excessive force could be argued on remand: “The officers’ unlawful entry into Chamberlain’s apartment, if borne out by proven facts, may affect the balancing of factors bearing on whether the officers’ use of force was objectively unreasonable under the circumstances.”

On several smaller issues, the circuit court upheld parts of the lower court’s ruling, but make no mistake: this was a significant victory for the Chamberlain family. If I live to see the murderers of Kenneth Chamberlain, Sr., Atatiana Jefferson, Breanna Taylor, George Floyd, and countless others receive the appropriate punishment, I will rest a little easier knowing that the arc of the moral universe does, maybe just a bit, bend toward justice. There’s a ray of hope.

More articles by:

Fred Baumgarten is a writer living in western Massachusetts.

Weekend Edition
July 03, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Peter Linebaugh
Police and the Wealth of Nations: Déjà Vu or Unfinished Business?
Rob Urie
Class, Race and Power
John Davis
A Requiem for George Floyd
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mutiny of the Bounties!
Richard D. Wolff
Revolutionary Possibilities: Could U.S. Capitalism Turn Nationalist?
Richard Falk
When Rogue States Sanction the International Criminal Court
Louis Proyect
Smearing Black Lives Matter…From the Left
Ralph Nader
Trump and Pence – Step Aside for Professional Pandemic Scientists and Managers
Ramzy Baroud
Tearing Down the Idols of Colonialism: Why Tunisia, Africa Must Demand French Apology
Philippe Marlière
Challenging the French Republic’s Color-Blindness
Richard C. Gross
Attack, Deny
Lee Camp
Connecting the Dates – US Media Used To Stop The ‘Threat’ of Peace
Steve Martinot
The Desire to Kill
David Yearsley
The War on Kitsch
Amy Eva Alberts Warren – Rev. William Alberts
Why are Certain Christians Democratic and Others Authoritarian?
Lawrence Davidson
Covid Madness
Brian Cloughley
Britain’s Disorder and Decline
Ellen Taylor
The US Military Has Its Knee on the Throat of the World
David Rosen
White Nationalists on the Attack
Jeff Cohen
Politicians of Color Should Not be Immune From Criticism
Joseph Natoli
Drawn Away from Reality in Plain View
Frank Joyce
Give Me Liberty,  Give You Death
Jonah Raskin
My Adventures in the Matriarchy
Paul Street
The Racist Counter-Revolution of 1776
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Corruption of the Democratic Party: Talking to Ted Rall about his new book
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
Trump’s Record on Foreign Policy: Lost Wars, New Conflicts and Broken Promises
Paul Edwards
A Bridge Too Far
Jennifer Joan Thompson
How to Do Things With Theses: Chile’s National Police Force Sues the Feminist Artistic Collective, Las Tesis
Shawn Fremstad
Vacations for All!
Thomas Knapp
A Modest Proposal for Compromise on “Confederate” Military Bases
Vijay Prashad, Eduardo Viloria Daboín, Ana Maldonado, and Zoe PC
Venezuela’s Borderlands Have Been Assaulted by COVID-19
Thom Hartmann
COVID Masks: The Latest Faux Conservative Outrage
Jesse Jackson
Mandatory College Football Practices in Time of Pandemic are Nuts
Nicholas Vincenzo Barney
Consensus Politics on the Fringe: The Intellectual Dishonesty of the Intellectual Dark Web
Ted Rall
The Data is Clear: Progressives Should Boycott Biden
Theresa Church
In Reconsidering ‘Normalcy’ Genetically Engineered Trees Do Not Belong
Chelsea Carrick
Let’s Not Lose Momentum
Adam Rissien
Sorry Secretary Perdue, Our National Forests are Not Crops
Arshad Khan
India and China Tussle on the Roof of the World
Paul Gilk
A Few Theoretical Percentages
Thomas S. Harrington
“New Corona Cases”:  A Phrase That’s Tells us Very Little, if Anything,  About the Actual Levels of Danger We  Face
Claire Chadwick
I Got COVID-19 at Work. I Won’t be the Last
George Wuerthner
The Upper Green River Should be a National Park, Not a Feedlot
Julian Vigo
Profiteering in the Era of COVID-19
Ravi Mangla
Policing is Not a Public Good
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail