FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

NATO: an Obituary 

NATO died recently. Over the past few months, its decline was rapid. Its death has yet to be reported in corporate media. It died because, as principally a vehicle for US imperialism, it required US leadership. Once that fell into the hands of a cabal of incompetents, no NATO country was any longer willing to follow this capitalist class clown car into future military adventures to protect the profits of fossil energy tycoons. Its withdrawal from the Paris Climate Treaty sent US leadership irredeemably down the European toilet. At the G20 meeting in Hamburg, Trump’s isolation was on full display. Commentators in the French news media ooze unabashed contempt for antics of Cheetohead and friends.

NATO’s original raison d’etre was stated to be blocking a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. The only problem with that rationale is that the Soviet Union never had the slightest interest in doing so. Containment of the treacherous commies was the official US propaganda line based on the absurd narrative that the Soviet military, until the early 1950s without nuclear weapons, intended to invade Western Europe into the teeth of the nuclear armed US. The Soviets doing so would be completely contrary to the their most basic interests, survival. Having lost over 30 million of its citizens during two German invasions in less than 30 years, continued war for the conquest of Western Europe would have deprived the Soviet Union of the opportunity to rebuild its devastated country. The Soviet’s overarching interest was in a divided and demilitarized Germany. They also wanted to have pro-Soviet governments in power as buffers between themselves and Germany.

Having achieved those objectives by 1945, for the Soviets to prolong their state of war, this time against the world’s sole nuclear power and several of its allies, over land the Soviets did not need in order to protect themselves from further German invasions, would be the height of folly. The idea that the Soviets wanted to go beyond their previously stated objectives, which had already been achieved, to attack Western Europe, exposing themselves to nuclear destruction, is simply illogical and ridiculous. Stalin may have been lots of odious things, but rash and suicidal were not his nature. But just as Hitler had succeeded in convincing the supposedly sophisticated Germans that Poland’s horseback cavalry was going to attack their tanks, the “Cold War” became a wildly successful cover story for US aggression.

New French president Emmanuel Macron came on the scene with a pro-American reputation. That’s gone. At one of the first major meetings of his presidency, Macron ritually slapped Putin on the wrist about gay rights and Ukraine and then immediately got down to the real business of hitting the restart button on France-Russia relations. His Foreign Minister was soon in Moscow. France was among the EU countries that pushed back immediately when the US Senate passed more sanctions on Iran and Russia. French business folks have been very busy signing billion dollar contracts in Tehran since the “nuclear treaty” and Iran sanctions lessened – including selling the Iranians 100 passenger planes from Airbus, partially owned by the French government. Europe gets most of its natural gas cheap from the Russians via pipelines. Americans would prefer they bought its more expensive gas via ships.

Recently, Macron said “Assad can stay”. That’s jumping off the bandwagon. Merkel was openly distancing herself from the US at the G20 meeting in Hamburg. European leaders are now talking about forming an EU army to replace NATO, currently being euphemistically referred to as a “common European defense zone” on the Parisian pundit parade. Europe is being pushed into improved relations with Russia by the universal European disrespect, if not revulsion, for Trump. Trump’s unintended consequences may lead to the ultimate failure of the post WWII US drive for world domination.

As a result of the demise of NATO, European countries become unreliable allies for future US aggressions. The desertion of these traditional allies will lead the US to more disreputable alliances featuring Israel, the Persian Gulf Sunni dictators (Saudi Arabia, etc) and an increasingly privatized (i.e., mercenary) US military.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled Again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail