FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Smog Alert: What Trump’s EPA Cut Proposals Could Do to Air Quality

The Environmental Protection Agency has been at the center of controversy since Trump nominated Scott Pruitt, who sued the EPA 13 times, to run the agency, as Trump’s Administration has already set a stark contrast on the environment from his predecessor, Barack Obama.

On April 12, a federal appeals court delayed a hearing on a lawsuit over a smog rule enacted by the Obama Administration to give the EPA and the Trump Administration time to decide what action they want to take on the 2015 rule. The rule reduced the allowable standard of ozone concentration in the air to 70 parts per billion from a 2008 standard of 75 parts per billion, and was criticized by environmental organizations for being too lax.

Throughout Pruitt’s career, he has fought against additional EPA smog protection and air quality rules, including the Cross State Air Pollution rule in 2015, fighting EPA efforts to reduce ozone emissions, challenging oil and gas drilling standards for air quality, opposing carbon pollution standards and other clean air standards for power plants. In many of these cases, Pruitt’s legal battles against the EPA were with the industries who were being regulated as co-parties in his cases.

Before the EPA was founded in 1970 and subsequent clean air and water standards were pushed for by individuals and environmental organizations, air and water pollution was even more rampant and damaging than it is today. In the 1960’s, New York City suffered from some of the worst air pollution in the country, and in 1966 somewhere between 160 to 400 people were killed in the city by a haze of sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. The Trump Administration and Scott Pruitt’s agenda for the EPA is embarking on a dangerous precipice to start repealing and scaling back the environmental regulations that have mitigated some of the damage caused by widespread air pollution and carbon emissions.

A 2013 study published in PNAS, led by economist at MIT, Michael Greenstone, found a direct correlation between air pollution and significant decreases in life expectancy, citing that air pollution in China shortened the lives of 500 million people in China by 2.5 billion years. The American Lung Association released a report in 2016 noting more than 50 percent of Americans live in areas with unhealthy levels of air pollution.

Rather than accept and develop strategies, policies, and regulations based on science, Trump’s EPA transition team have made claims that the EPA and scientists have lied about the dangers of air pollution. This unsubstantiated belief not just in climate change and the science behind it, but beliefs against the dangers associated with air pollutants to human health are placing in danger the environment and health of the Americans the EPA was created to protect. The 2017 State of Global air report cited air pollution as the 5th leading cause of death globally.

“Decades of research conducted in numerous cities throughout the world show that when air pollution levels increase, so do the numbers of people dying. More important, studies of long-term exposure to air pollution demonstrate that people living in more polluted locations die prematurely, compared with those living in areas with lower levels of pollution,” the report noted. “Research also provides details on how air pollution affects human health, with evidence clearly showing impacts on the rates of cardiovascular disease and stroke, in addition to the more easily appreciated effects on respiratory disease.”

The Clean Air Act was initially enacted in 1970 and amended several times since as a tool to regulate and reduce air pollution in the United States. A 2016 report on air trends conducted by the EPA detailed the success of the most recent amendment to the Clean Air Act in 1990; “nationally, concentrations of the criteria air pollutants have dropped significantly since 1990:

+ Carbon Monoxide (CO) 8-Hour,  77%

+ Lead (Pb) 3-Month Average,  99%

+ Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Annual,  54%

+ Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 1-Hour,  47%

+ Ozone (O3) 8-Hour,  22%

+ Particulate Matter 10 microns (PM10) 24-Hour,  39%

+ Particulate Matter 2.5 microns (PM2.5) Annual,  37%

+ Particulate Matter 2.5 microns (PM2.5) 24-Hour,  37%

+ Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 1-Hour,  81%”

So far, Trump’s Administration has signaled they plan, with EPA Chief Scott Pruitt’s “back to basics” plan, to revoke as much of the environmental movement and Clean Air Act’s progress in pushing the EPA to take meaningful measures to protect the environment and everything that survives on it, including us.

More articles by:

Michael Sainato’s writing has appeared in the Guardian, Miami Herald, Baltimore Sun, Denver Post, Buffalo News, the Hill, Alternet, and several other publications . Follow him on twitter: @MSainat1

September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
Kenn Orphan
The Power of Language in the Anthropocene
Paul Cox – Stan Cox
Puerto Rico’s Unnatural Disaster Rolls on Into Year Two
Rajan Menon
Yemen’s Descent Into Hell: a Saudi-American War of Terror
Russell Mokhiber
Nick Brana Says Dems Will Again Deny Sanders Presidential Nomination
Nicholas Levis
Three Lessons of Occupy Wall Street, With a Fair Dose of Memory
Steve Martinot
The Constitutionality of Homeless Encampments
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
The Aftershocks of the Economic Collapse Are Still Being Felt
Jesse Jackson
By Enforcing Climate Change Denial, Trump Puts Us All in Peril
George Wuerthner
Coyote Killing is Counter Productive
Mel Gurtov
On Dealing with China
Dean Baker
How to Reduce Corruption in Medicine: Remove the Money
September 19, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
When Bernie Sold Out His Hero, Anti-Authoritarians Paid
Lawrence Davidson
Political Fragmentation on the Homefront
George Ochenski
How’s That “Chinese Hoax” Treating You, Mr. President?
Cesar Chelala
The Afghan Morass
Chris Wright
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Howard Lisnoff
The Beat Goes On Against Protest in Saudi Arabia
Nomi Prins 
The Donald in Wonderland: Down the Financial Rabbit Hole With Trump
Jack Rasmus
On the 10th Anniversary of Lehman Brothers 2008: Can ‘IT’ Happen Again?
Richard Schuberth
Make Them Suffer Too
Geoff Beckman
Kavanaugh in Extremis
Jonathan Engel
Rather Than Mining in Irreplaceable Wilderness, Why Can’t We Mine Landfills?
Binoy Kampmark
Needled Strawberries: Food Terrorism Down Under
Michael McCaffrey
A Curious Case of Mysterious Attacks, Microwave Weapons and Media Manipulation
Elliot Sperber
Eating the Constitution
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail