FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Use the Recess Appointment Clause to Appoint a Progressive Black Woman to the U.S. Supreme Court: an Open Letter to Obama

Dear President Obama,

Today, while the Senate is still in Easter recess, is the exact time to appoint a very progressive black woman to the Supreme Court under the recess appointment clause of the Constitution. This clause gives the President the power “to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.” Art. II, §2, cl. 3.

1 The Senate is now in Recess for more than 10 days, from March 21 to April 1.

2 Even if the Senate goes into a pro forma session during this recess, the Senate announced that it is in Recess with respect to the crucial task of considering your initial Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, or anyone else you may nominate for Senate consideration. The Senate leaders said they would not consider any presidential appointee until the next President is elected and takes office. Thus, even when the Senate returns to regular session with respect to other matters on April 1, the Senate remains in recess with respect to considering your Supreme Court nominee.

3 This case raises issues different from those in NLRB v. Canning because in this case the Senate leadership announced that the Senate was in recess with respect to the task of considering a nominee for the Supreme Court and the Senate did in fact fail to take any step to consider your nominee. In NLRB v. Canning, Senate leadership made no such pronouncement. In the present situation, the Senate majority leader announced that it is in recess exclusively regarding the constitutionally assigned business of considering a Supreme Court nominee.

Thus, a recess appointment is not only a valid way to fill the Supreme Court vacancy. It is the only way to timely fill the vacancy. A recess appointment satisfies the underlying purpose of the recess appointment clause of the constitution. Failing to use this constitutional power would mean acquiescence to the unconstitutional seizure of power by the Senate majority leader to block consideration and impose undue delay. Using the recess appointment power would put a stop to any future such attempt to unconstitutionally seize such power.

The court decided NLRB v. Canning in view of the purpose of the recess appointment power, “to ensure the continued functioning of the Federal Government when the Senate is away.” When the Senate leadership expressly announces that it is permanently away for the purpose of considering your appointment to the Supreme Court, the purpose of the recess appointment power has been satisfied. The time to use this constitutional power is today.

While the Senate has the exclusive power to give its advice and consent under the regular appointment clause, you, the president, have the exclusive power to make a recess appointment under the backup recess appointment clause. Yes, the Senate can be blamed for not using its constitutional power. In addition, it will be you, not the Senate, to blame if you also fail to use your constitutional power when the Senate is actually in recess and in addition when the Senate leadership has declared itself in permanent recess for considering any appointment you may make.

Today is the day to appoint the first progressive black woman to the U.S. Supreme Court under the recess appointment clause.

Thank you for considering this.

Best regards,

James Marc Leas

More articles by:

James Marc Leas is a patent attorney and a past co-chair of the National Lawyers Guild Palestine Subcommittee. He collected evidence in Gaza immediately after Operation Pillar of Defense in November 2012 as part of a 20 member delegation from the U.S. and Europe and authored or co-authored four articles for Counterpunch describing findings, including Why the Self-Defense Doctrine Doesn’t Legitimize Israel’s Assault on Gaza. He also participated in the February 2009 National Lawyers Guild delegation to Gaza immediately after Operation Cast Lead and contributed to its report, “Onslaught: Israel’s Attack on Gaza and the Rule of Law.”

February 20, 2019
Anthony DiMaggio
Withdrawal Pains and Syrian Civil War: An Analysis of U.S. Media Discourse
Charles Pierson
When Saudi Arabia Gets the Bomb
Doug Johnson Hatlem
“Electability” is Real (Unless Married with the Junk Science of Ideological Spectrum Analysis)
Kenneth Surin
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Another Boondoggle in Virginia
John Feffer
The Psychology of the Wall
Dean Baker
Modern Monetary Theory and Taxing the Rich
Russell Mokhiber
Citizens Arrested Calling Out Manchin on Rockwool
George Ochenski
Unconstitutional Power Grabs
Michael T. Klare
War With China? It’s Already Under Way
Thomas Knapp
The Real Emergency Isn’t About the Wall, It’s About the Separation of Powers
Manuel García, Jr.
Two Worlds
Daniel Warner
The Martin Ennals and Victorian Prize Winners Contrast with Australia’s Policies against Human Dignity
Norman Solomon
What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives
Dan Corjescu
2020 Vision: A Strategy of Courage
Matthew Johnson
Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?
William A. Cohn
Something New and Something Old: a Story Still Being Told
Bill Martin
The Fourth Hypothesis: the Present Juncture of the Trump Clarification and the Watershed Moment on the Washington Mall
February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams
Thomas Knapp
The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC
Mitchel Cohen
A Tale of Two Citations: Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and Michael Harrington’s “The Other America”
Jake Johnston
Haiti and the Collapse of a Political and Economic System
Dave Lindorff
It’s Not Just Trump and the Republicans
Laura Flanders
An End to Amazon’s Two-Bit Romance. No Low-Rent Rendezvous.
Patrick Walker
Venezuelan Coup Democrats Vomit on Green New Deal
Natalie Dowzicky
The Millennial Generation Will Tear Down Trump’s Wall
Nick Licata
Of Stress and Inequality
Joseph G. Ramsey
Waking Up on President’s Day During the Reign of Donald Trump
Elliot Sperber
Greater Than Food
Weekend Edition
February 15, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Matthew Hoh
Time for Peace in Afghanistan and an End to the Lies
Chris Floyd
Pence and the Benjamins: An Eternity of Anti-Semitism
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail