FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Sick Over-Reactions to Islamic Terrorism

Sick overreactions to Islamic terrorism are becoming archetypical. The first overreaction advocates pitiless counterism (a term designed to be broader than counter-terrorism). The second overreaction is the looming mistreatment of Muslim diaspora. The third overreaction maligns the faith of Islam. I will argue below that these overreactions foster lawlessness, fail to prevent terrorism, and inject poison into relations with the Muslim world.

Let me clarify Islamic terrorism, a tag whose appropriateness, for good reasons, has been questioned in academic literature. I use Islamic terrorism to mean acts of violence perpetrated by Muslims. For example, the recent Paris attacks (11/13/15) constitute Islamic terrorism since they were allegedly committed by Muslims. That the suspects belong to a militant organization, such as the ISIS, adds fervor to calling it Islamic terrorism. That the perpetrators are Sunni, Shia, Wahabi, or even non-practicing Muslims, though noteworthy, matters little in the politics of tagging. Many nations, including Muslim nations allied with the West such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey suffer terrorist violence. Muslim nations do not brand such violence as Islamic terrorism. Islam and terrorism are correlated only when violence is committed against Western targets or unleashed inside a Western nation, such as the attacks in France.

Pitiless Counterism

Hours after the Paris attack, the fiery rhetoric emitted in France was reckless. President Francoise Hollande promised a “pitiless” counter-offensive. Within a day, France launched massive airstrikes against the ISIS targets in Syria and Iraq. It is unclear who was killed in these strikes. Facts are the first casualty of pitiless counterism.

Pitiless counterism is a term I use to denote lawless invasions, massive bombardments, extreme tolerance for collateral damage (killing of civilians), unlawful detentions, secret prisons, and infliction of torture. In law, pitiless counterism means utter disregard of international humanitarian law, human rights obligations, and constitutional restraints on the use of force.

The French pitilessness was imitation art of the 9/11 counterism. Recall that after 9/11 attacks, the U.S. atmosphere was filled with putrid verbosity of causing “shock and awe” through the use of force. President Bush uttered a thrilling aphorism “you’re either with us, or against us,” as if reality is binary. Motivated by pitiless counterism, Afghanistan was invaded and the Taliban government was overthrown. Cab drivers, teachers, and other innocent bystanders were detained and sent to Guantanamo. Detainees were tortured in open and secret prisons. Not satiated with pitiless harm done to Afghanistan, a war still unfinished, Bush invaded Iraq, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians.

A leaf from history demonstrates that pitiless counterism is not new to France. In 1830, France invaded Algeria, using “scorched-earth tactics, destroying animals and crops and massacring villagers.” Algeria was invaded to avenge the honor of the French people because the Dey (ruler) of Algiers hit the French ambassador with a hand fan and refused to apologize. The merciless invasion was a blatant mockery of the French ideals formulated in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, which states: “The goal of any political association is the conservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, safety and resistance against oppression.” What France did in Algeria would now easily qualify as war crimes and crimes against humanity. Forgetting its brutal colonial history, France fantasizes itself as a holier-than-thou nation, as light of liberty.

French delusions aside, pitiless counterism is a stupid doctrine. If an insane person attacks a town, the answer is not for the entire town to become insane. If one hundred persons are killed, the remedy is not to kill a hundred thousand people. If a building is razed, the solution is not to erase an entire village. Firing bullets to alleviate pain is quack medicine. Sometimes, absorbing pain is indispensable for restoring wellbeing. Sometimes, even a proportionate counterforce is counterproductive. Wisdom has rarely been the forte of the war-addicted West.

Mistreating Muslim Diaspora

Tied to pitiless counterism is the Sword of Damocles permanently hanging over Muslims living in the West. Whenever a terror attack occurs in a Western nation, Muslim communities are placed under instant surveillance. “Suspect houses” are raided. “Suspect persons” are detained. Muslim men are profiled. Muslim women are harassed. Mosques are infiltrated. Even Muslim doctors, engineers, lawyers, accountants, mothers at home, and Muslim children in school feel the pressure of omnipresent culpability. Despite ballyhooing individual rights and responsibilities, the Western mindset cannot cast off the notions of shared guilt and collective punishment.

France must not forget that Algerians, Tunisians, and Moroccans are French Muslims. They must be respected as full French citizens even if a few individuals among them perpetrate acts of violence. If the white-skinned France is unable to do so, then France should repeal Article 1 of its constitution, which states: “France shall ensure the equality of all citizens before the law, without distinction of origin, race or religion. It shall respect all beliefs.” France should also un-sign the European Convention on Human rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, both of which mandate in identical language that “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” France will breach international obligations, and spoil its own fantasies, if French Muslims are degraded and their religion is trashed by French officials and French media.

Maligning Islam

The third overreaction comes in the form of maligning Islam, a menacing chorus of ugly voices. Western politicians, journalists, and terrorism experts begin to attack Islam, even if perpetrators are non-practicing Muslims. In January 2015, in response to Charlie Hebdo attacks, Prime Minister Manual Valls delivered a passionate speech declaring that France is “at war with radical Islam.” Abraham Foxman, the national director of Anti-Defamation League, admires Valls for “calling it what it is.” Foxman goads Western leaders to shun political correctness and boldly employ the phrase “radical Islam” if “we want to win the war.” Some cohorts invoke genocidal ideologies, minted and practiced in the West, such as Fascism and Nazism, to build correlations with Islam, the faith of more than a billion people of all races living in all continents.

“Calling it what it is” is treacherous teaching. Who decides what Islam or for that matter any religion is? Louis Farrakhan calls Judaism a “gutter religion.” Nietzsche branded Christianity as a religion of pathological pity. Nazis refused to accept Judaism as a religion, instead calling it a race. One sure way to defeat counter-terrorism and alienate, if not radicalize, Muslim communities is to tell them that Islam cultivates addiction to violence – a theory espoused in terrorism literature.

By all counts, the three overreactions discussed above are mendacious. Two eyes for one eye and all teeth for one tooth is the manual of sick minds. The human species cannot be surrendered to vengeful masters of any race, religion, or national anthem. We need no fiends to show us the way.

More articles by:

Liaquat Ali Khan is the founder of Legal Scholar Academy, a firm dedicated to the protection of civil rights and human liberties. Send your comments and question to legal. scholar. academy[at] gmail.com

September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savoir
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail