Lipstick Nightmare for Spin Merchant

It is not a field of a few acres of ground, but a cause, that we are defending, and whether we defeat the enemy in one battle, or by degrees, the consequences will be the same.

Thomas Paine.

The above quote ‘prescience epitomised’?

Globalization far beyond a ‘few acres of ground’; as much as Earth seen  by way of  issue and control of money the cause of enemy as must be defended against?

Whether ‘together’ as   never before – or apart as ‘forever’ – sense of ‘wandering son’ prevailing  as way of perdition being hegemonic?

‘Stateless Bastard’ being so as to ‘Justice’ incorporated – but that there be ‘War’ such the treachery as so to be undeclared by ‘Ubermenschen’ in vain apperception as constituent of cause?

As ‘the drone’ launches another missile; death of innocent rationalised by ‘free press’- concerning   ‘far off land’ which has something so desired?

‘Artificial insemination’ demanding getting of syringe; such the farm, such the breed –  such the swine?

Let alone the absence of declaration as arrogation of right, ‘New American Century’ so standing:  and ‘Thousand Year Reich’   redux?

Remember Poland?

Way of ‘Canned Goods’?

As ‘Generation of Swine’ so treacherous would be hunted by another ‘son of Thomas’?

So it goes.

‘Human nature’, not of itself vicious – but as to that of bastard progeny as so being ‘Stateless’ different matter?

That there be further blood spilled, further sufferance leading to ‘gain’ as consequence following ‘cold’; as silver leads to gold,  such the heartlessness; such the machination  of  the control and issue – as whence there be abrogation in cause?

‘Know thine enemy’ being advice worthy of Machiavelli; but that it takes such ‘Paine’ and sufferance of  humanity?

Must forgive – for in such naiveté there be a ‘tread’ of dare as recognises ‘Angel’?

And much the ‘Doubting’ there must be Thomas – form of ‘Paine’?

War being waged such juncture cause of taxation being ‘hidden’ the subject of this small article.

For there circulates amongst the body humane such hidden parasite vicious as to be viral, and as ‘swine’ would so tax dialectic as to be degenerated to such reduction effected; as would make of  wondrous beauty mere ‘currency’ as ‘contemporaneous’; ‘time being money’ as ‘triumph’ of  the ephemeral in illusion; form of ‘Corporatism’; sponsored ‘International’ by ‘complete banker’  – as Necrotroph?

2009 – ‘The Year of the Pig with Lipstick’ as may be said in China?

Such the ‘cynicism’ as ‘symbiosis’ indeed, as seen by another Thomas (POTUS 3).

Such sense as ‘Economics’ be comprehended by look in wallet or purse – or  upon ‘Statement’ digital as bank; such being  aspect of  ‘Panopticon’?

‘Enemy of the State’ indeed, such the ‘morality’ caste…

Figures at the end of the day reflecting ‘quality of life’ –   as so ‘allowed’ – such being the ‘permit’ as granted to International Banker?

As ‘Turn of Screw’?

A parasitical, warped minority as would so reduce by way of ‘gain pragmatic’; as would ‘ feed’  from  illusion; way of ‘worship’ of  filthy lucre,  stand to ‘gain’ accordant by way of deception in the turning of belief through ‘spin’?

As causes this writer to spit?

Say nought of ‘rage, rage against the dying’ – as put a Thomas concerning ‘of the light’?

The minority control as determines categorisation, as divides way of ‘for or against’; as would use language to rationalise what amounts to no more than mere lust for lucre –  to  cry of ‘more’?

In worship of Mammon –  despite ‘sense of law’ known?

But that the following should so ‘stand’ as in the resounding of pity transcending scorn for those so ‘intimate with greed’ as ‘sup with long spoon’  be demanded whence Statelessness of the bastard so delineated.

As in:

It is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving, it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.

Thomas Paine.

Again, again – here be ‘Paine’?

As but one right amongst many such being the transcendence– should election be so exercised  as being ‘man’, sense of homo sapiens  –  and  gender disregarded?

Herein a small profession, such as being ‘exercise’, seen by moral genius quoted above as to ‘self true’ in the cleaving; as  ‘humanity legitimate’  be platitude – or simple truth the expression ‘un modulated’- being out of mouth of  ‘eternal child’ as ‘puer aeternus’?

That the current situation Economic be so hurtful, so punitive, so derisory of humanity in the consequence of systemic failure spun by way of illusion propagated as to be interpreted as mere ‘happenstance’; and not  the wilful product of scheme of gain in abrogation of rights of man as potentiality so gifted in breath of life as is found to be wanting resultant of the trying by exercise of reason judicious of  the ‘aspiration’ of bastard Stateless – as to lead towards professing:  ‘No belief!’?

That so many suffer?

As in ‘Thar she blows!’  biggest pig ‘snorting’ at trough seen, as ‘whale of a swine’,  such the Statelessness of the bastard realised, as challenge to spin- form of ‘lipstick applied’ the disguise cosmetic?

Such the ‘crying of the lot’ asked of Thomas?

As in: ‘Do not believe in Politics as profession’ averted?

Such the ‘Paine’ being as lipstick in huge quantity, however artfully applied, cannot disguise?

As  ‘Dream On – Stateless Bastard!’  be the product of scheme ‘gang agley’?

In Britain at this time there is much questioning of ‘Professional Politicians’, who are referred to as ‘honourable member’.

The ongoing scandal of taxpayer being ‘ripped off’  by said   ‘honourable member’ , as would lead to profession of  ‘No belief’?

In a fascinating yet ‘understandable’ turn of events, (of which more at another juncture concerning ‘onion peeled’), there has been a clear and determined focus by a  British ‘free press’ under ‘freedom of information’ on what could be referred to as ‘small pork’ of Professional Politicians – and question of the applicability of ‘honourable’ in the ride upon ‘gravy train’ as leads to snout in trough; form of outrageous expenses claimed – and paid.

For taxpayer in Britain the whistle has been well and truly blown – ‘game’ on!

Small pork being the expenses claimed from the taxpayer.

As ‘gouge of the profiteer’; or ‘act of worship’ of International Banker such the subjugation as imitation sincerest form of flattery, ‘in for a cent, in for a dollar’ prevailing – but who ‘coins the currency’ the real power in such idolatry the question as would not be asked? (Courtesy of Thomas)

Revelation occurring despite the protest of ‘Politicians Professional’ who wished to keep it private, keep it secret; as far as the taxpayer funding such excess be ‘cognisant’?

To keep profession private, as it were, and as being of ‘no belief unrecognised’  –  as not to ‘lead toward profession’?.

‘Look over there, not here!’, indeed.

Or: ‘You have no right to look here!’?

The term ‘pork’ in American Politics being associated with the ‘stuffing’ of legislation with benefits directed by way of State, or Corporation, and upon which ‘Interest Group’ thrives.

‘Big  pork’.

The Politician so sponsoring such clause pragmatic, oft hidden, oft obscure in the phrasing, as may claim ‘due representation’ where State or Corporation so located therein, is involved, by way of benefits conferred in the representation reflected in the allocation of resources being thus ‘efficacious’ and legitimate contended  –  and ‘kickback’ by way of ‘quid pro quo’  having come to be disguised in many ways as to be not directly connected?

Whence ‘big pork’ so ‘cut’; becomes ‘little pork’ –  way of the application of the knife by ‘Old Macky’  as announcement : ‘Back in town’?

So it goes, so it goes.

As to whence ‘others’ benefit in the ‘honour’ of representation the ‘cause’ as primacy?

The ‘kickback’  being when ‘big pork’ become ‘little pork’ – as when ‘share’ finds way into pocket of  ‘person’ professing to be politician  small by way of ‘due reward’.

– As to when self benefits in the honour so degraded of representation the ‘cause’?

You know when that shark bites…

Halliburton, Tamiflu, Wall St, Shock and awe; the French saying as to ‘the more things change the more they remain the same’ –  all  about ‘Pork’?

But…

Cut to ‘the chase’

The origins of  all ‘pork’ the accumulated resources of taxation; the contribution of Citizen towards  Government as supports Law and Order being determined under Politics or  ‘Moral Economics’, in control of the barrel given over by way of ‘trust’.

And that there be  ‘Democracy’!

As on ‘Greenback’ as moved from Silver, moved from Gold  to Fiat the way of International Banker, and as to change of promise not being  mere ‘solicitation’ –  the music of ‘snake charmer’ resonating?

The reptile of ‘money as belief’ so rising from ‘basket’, such being the ‘case’?

Or should that be ‘worms’ as can opened given the precedence of International Banker over mere Politician Professional?

As toilets once designed in Germany to so discover by way of examination of stool, given fondness for   ‘Schwein’?

‘Personal Pork’ in case of the consideration of current case of scandal political as ‘surprising conjunction’: in Britain the direct benefit of Politician professional  by way of ‘recompense’ under allowance claimable, and as determined by beneficiary,  is as thereby susceptible to ‘distortion’ – as when a system regulated by beneficiaries  will lead to ‘distortion’, aka ‘corruption endemic’.

Or should that be unregulated; way of ‘laissez faire’ or ‘free markets’ – as in ‘enjoinment’?

Honourable?

Those who make the laws for themselves, such sense as being above the rest, such the ‘honour’ of political representation; the spirit of such laws readily degenerated to mere pragmatism in form of snout guzzling at trough by way of ‘adjusted recompense’  –  way of the letter?

As worship occurring at the feet of International Banker who care not who makes the laws – so long as they have control of the issue of money?

As:  ‘when a body meet a body, coming through the rye’?

Such as would be ‘caught’, as per Mr. Salinger; such the pragmatism delineated in the transcendence?

Caught – when humanity  professes :

‘NO BELIEF!’?

Addendum.

Some of those claims in detail made by  ‘honourable members’  as professional in Britain at taxpayers expense, and expressed in Dollars:

(Amounts approximate given fluctuation in exchange rates –  ‘challenge and be damned further’ – as you know who you are, and what you are, indeed. Such being the volatility.)

$16  for pornography watched in a hotel room.

$ 180,000 claimed on a relative’s house as being ‘main home’

$15,000 paid to son as ‘assistant’

$25 paid for a remembrance wreath for those fallen in war. (And as laid)

$90,000 claimed for living in parent’s house.

The list goes on.

Swimming pools, horse manure, tennis courts, ‘moat’ being cleaned and chandeliers.

All heaped upon the back of the taxpayer – by Politician serving International Banker.

But that lipstick be applied upon and such snouts not be seen, whence such sufferance surrounding as abounding?

But that the contrast not be seen midst the sufferance; that the honour not be questioned?

As nightmare for British spin merchants, as there be not enough lipstick to hand?

Side note oblique:

The Bilderberg Group meeting began yesterday – all our troubles seeming so far away?

Lord Conrad Black sending apologies, one wonders?

Currently incarcerated as result of ‘crimes discovered’.

As in my dreams all such criminals will be one day – and better dreams than nightmares?

‘No lipstick required’  – when ‘Justice prevails’ as the truth out, as it will – and there being no need for profession concerning belief?

The real question: ‘Ain’t life beautiful?’

As Thomas Paine realised in thought as in deed, and as led to prescience epitomic?

Form of   ‘Common Sense’ – as ‘Counter Punch’ be  ‘pamphleteer digital’?

STEPHEN MARTIN can be reached at: stephenmarti@yahoo.com

 

Stephen Martin can be reached at: stephenmarti@yahoo.com