FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Volunteer Military and the Wicked Adventure

When I came back from Vietnam in 1971, there was a new program in the Army called VOLAR. That’s short for volunteer Army, because the military would prefer an arcane acronym over plain language any day of the week.

The draft was being dumped because it was being blamed for the sorry state of the US military in Vietnam, where the armed forces were melting down with low morale, poor discipline, and generalized mental illness often taking the form of substance abuse. The draft, it was reasoned, was tapping unreliable sectors for unmotivated troops who were too quick to rebel against being press-ganged into an actual shooting war.

The same people who applied this scalpel-like logic were, of course, completely unprepared to assess the impact of the character of the war itself on troops:

(1) a war that had been misrepresented as a defense of America;

(2) a war against a tenacious enemy with a home-court advantage, and

(3) a war with a geo-strategic disposition such that a US defeat was nearly certain.

On top of all that, millions of civilians were killed, before and after we burned their houses and slaughtered their livestock and poisoned their land, and many of us began to question the morality of how exactly the war was being conducted.

None of this–applying the logic that the draft was the problem–could ever in a million years really account for a troop growing weary of slogging through dioxin-stained wilderness for a month at a time without a bath, subjected to being picked off or maimed in an unpredictable, terror-stricken instant, smoking God-knows-what to take the edge off his conscience and his frazzled nerves, and filling his idle time with fantasies of shooting his officers.

No, indeed. It was the draft.

The draft was a public relations problem at home. No parent is keen to surrender the fruit of his or her loins to an impersonal government, at an age where the youngster can barely grow a moustache, and have him shipped home in a wheelchair or a box or crazy as hell. No spouse wants a partner sent back that way. No kid wants a parent sent back that way.

Based on the faulty logic that associated conscription with political defeat, and upon the real rebellion against conscription into an immoral military adventure, the US Department of Defense decided that it needed for troops to sign themselves in voluntarily. Pay was increased. Quarters were improved. Many abuses were rousted out. More medals and merit badges were authorized. Services were increased. The general economy went into the crapper, and voila! VOLAR was a success.

Oh yeah. They also withdrew from Vietnam. That, too.

Today, there is an additional benefit to war apologists of a volunteer force. Using the consumer culture aversion to and overwhelming lack of familiarity with the basic rules of actual logic, war boosters now trot out the “volunteer military” as justification for any hare-brained, wicked, or illegal military adventure in which they decide to engage.

That justification goes like this: Every troop signs on the dotted line without a gun pressed to his or her head, knowing that the armed forces are used for armed conflict. Therefore, neither they nor we have any right to complain about the conditions they might face, since everyone knows that war is hell.

Something like that. “So stop whining.”

The sly thing about this argument is that it is used today against people like me, who want the occupation of Iraq ended and the troops–one of whom is my son–sent back to their home duty stations.

What’s sly?

Our argument to bring the troops home is based not on the conditions, but on the faked premises for and illegality of the war itself. Our complaint about the conditions, about our loved ones being exposed to hardship and danger, is based on the fact that the whole adventure is hare-brained, wicked, and illegal. This counterfeit rebuttal about “volunteer military” has about as much to do with the stupidity, immorality, and criminality of the war as the validity of a driver’s license has to do with the model and make of a car.

Note, we haven’t been saying bring them home now from their mission to do holy work. We have said bring our loved ones out of an incompetently executed, illegal war that was entered into based on lies and fabrications. Jumping off into a discussion about our loved ones’ volunteer status is a way to duck that last part… that part about incompetence, illegality, lies, fabrications… stuff like that.

Sly.

To make our argument that a volunteer military does not magically waive international law, commons sense, and common decency, we need not even digress to point out that all “volunteering” is not equal; that the “choice” between working in a shit job for poverty wages or joining the Army is not quite the same a “choice” between going to Harvard Law School or joining the Army. Just like the choice between being drafted into Vietnam or going to jail is not the same as the choice between being drafted into Vietnam or getting a special slot assigned to you in the Texas Air National Guard and being allowed to skip drills to attend alcoholic frat parties.

Yeah, that “volunteer” definition can be pretty sly, too. It reminds me of those Galois-smoking existentialists arguing that we are always free no matter what because we can opt out through suicide. A pretty clever conceit, but not exactly something most of us rely on for day-to-day decisions.

At the end of the day, here’s the real deal. Volunteer or not, in the United States, for those who haven’t checked into this subject, the military NEVER decides when we will or won’t go to war. The people who “volunteer” that decision are civilians, i.e., Congress and the President (unless of course, a cowed, spineless, opportunistic, anemometric Congress abdicates all its power to a semi-literate demagogue in the Oval Office).

So toss that smelly old red herring into the trash, will you, and carry it out to the curb.

STAN GOFF is the author of “Hideous Dream: A Soldier’s Memoir of the US Invasion of Haiti” (Soft Skull Press, 2000) and of the upcoming book “Full Spectrum Disorder” (Soft Skull Press, 2003). He is a member of the BRING THEM HOME NOW! coordinating committee, a retired Special Forces master sergeant, and the father of an active duty soldier. Email for BRING THEM HOME NOW! is bthn@mfso.org.

Goff can be reached at: sherrynstan@igc.org

 

More articles by:
July 17, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Trump & The Big Bad Bugs
Robert Hunziker
Trump Kills Science, Nature Strikes Back
John Grant
The Politics of Cruelty
Kenneth Surin
Calculated Buffoonery: Trump in the UK
Binoy Kampmark
Helsinki Theatrics: Trump Meets Putin
Patrick Bond
BRICS From Above, Seen Critically From Below
Jim Kavanagh
Fighting Fake Stories: The New Yorker, Israel and Obama
Daniel Falcone
Chomsky on the Trump NATO Ruse
W. T. Whitney
Oil Underground in Neuquén, Argentina – and a New US Military Base There
Doug Rawlings
Ken Burns’ “The Vietnam War” was Nominated for an Emmy, Does It Deserve It?
Rajan Menon
The United States of Inequality
Thomas Knapp
Have Mueller and Rosenstein Finally Gone Too Far?
Cesar Chelala
An Insatiable Salesman
Dean Baker
Truth, Trump and the Washington Post
Mel Gurtov
Human Rights Trumped
Binoy Kampmark
Putin’s Football Gambit: How the World Cup Paid Off
July 16, 2018
Sheldon Richman
Trump Turns to Gaza as Middle East Deal of the Century Collapses
Charles Pierson
Kirstjen Nielsen Just Wants to Protect You
Brett Wilkins
The Lydda Death March and the Israeli State of Denial
Patrick Cockburn
Trump Knows That the US Can Exercise More Power in a UK Weakened by Brexit
Robert Fisk
The Fisherman of Sarajevo Told Tales Past Wars and Wars to Come
Gary Leupp
When Did Russia Become an Adversary?
Uri Avnery
“Not Enough!”
Dave Lindorff
Undermining Trump-Putin Summit Means Promoting War
Manuel E. Yepe
World Trade War Has Begun
Binoy Kampmark
Trump Stomps Britain
Wim Laven
The Best Deals are the Deals that Develop Peace
Kary Love
Can We Learn from Heinrich Himmler’s Daughter? Should We?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Franklin Lamb, Requiescat in Pace
Weekend Edition
July 13, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Brian Cloughley
Lessons That Should Have Been Learned From NATO’s Destruction of Libya
Paul Street
Time to Stop Playing “Simon Says” with James Madison and Alexander Hamilton
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of Formula and Honey
Aidan O'Brien
Ireland’s Intellectuals Bow to the Queen of Chaos 
Michael Collins
The Affirmative Action Silo
Andrew Levine
Tipping Points
Geoff Dutton
Fair and Balanced Opinion at the New York Times
Ajamu Baraka
Cultural and Ideological Struggle in the US: a Final Comment on Ocasio-Cortez
David Rosen
The New McCarthyism: Is the Electric Chair Next for the Left?
Ken Levy
The McConnell Rule: Nasty, Brutish, and Unconstitutional
George Wuerthner
The Awful Truth About the Hammonds
Robert Fisk
Will Those Killed by NATO 19 Years Ago in Serbia Ever Get Justice?
Robert Hunziker
Three Climatic Monsters with Asteroid Impact
Ramzy Baroud
Europe’s Iron Curtain: The Refugee Crisis is about to Worsen
Nick Pemberton
A Letter For Scarlett JoManDaughter
Marilyn Garson
Netanyahu’s War on Transcendence 
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail