FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Propaganda’s Triumph

by

Those doubting the effectiveness of the mass propaganda system in America—the vaunted home of the “free press”—would be wise to examine the remarkable shift in public opinion occurring in regards to the reintroduction of American forces into Iraq.

At the beginning of the summer, a time when the propaganda system was fully consumed with demonizing Comrade Putin of Red Russia, only a minority of Americans expressed support in that greatest of American pastimes: the hurling of American bombs at Iraq.  Come September, however, and such support has suddenly vaulted to an amazing 71-percent.  Even more remarkable, a NBC/Wall Street Journal poll found 34-percent now favoring the use of ground troops in the fight against the Islamic State—i.e., the threat “beyond anything that we’ve seen.

What happened?  After all, one need only go back mere weeks to witness the power elite openly fretting over just how to overcome American war fatigue.  And now, amid ongoing economic and social crises at home, the necessary political space has been opened for the American Congress to approve millions of more dollars in military expenditures in the fight against Islamic rebels without eliciting little more than a whimper of popular protest.

The answer for what has occurred lies in the propaganda system.

In early August, President Obama first announced the use of American air strikes against the Islamic State in northern Iraq “to prevent a potential act of genocide” against the Yazidis, a local minority community.  Because, as the “responsibility to protect” doctrine dictates, American military power is all that stands in the way of genocide.  That is, “genocide” committed by “bad guys” who just so happen to control important geopolitical nations.  Think: Iraq, Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Iraq, etc.  As for any genocide committed by a “good guy,” well, the “lone democracy in the Middle East” must be allowed to defend itself from “terrorists.”

But all the tales of the besieged Yazidis being rescued by those great M16 toting humanitarians of the U.S. military didn’t quite suffice to fully move the American public onto a proper war footing.  The hangover from the Iraq war (part II) still lingered.  Understandable, considering the war launched to prevent a war (“preemptive defense”) blew a three-plus trillion dollar hole in the American coffer, let alone having left thousands of American GIs killed and maimed (in addition to claiming millions more “unworthy” victims in Iraq).  So try as they might, the “respectable press” could not sell the prevention of “genocide” as a casus belli to a still war-weary public.  The responsibility to protect mantra of the liberal interventionists clearly has its limits.

The time had come, then, for the propaganda system’s trump card.  Enter fear.

On August 19, the Islamic State uploaded a video online purporting to show the beheading of American journalist James Foley.  Soon thereafter, two more videos surfaced documenting the beheading of American journalist Steven Scotloff and British aid worker David Haines.  Such crimes were exactly what the war hawks in Washington needed to bring the American people around.  Indeed, for a culture obsessed with the cult of positive thinking, there is always a bright side, even to a beheading.

 

And yet, the macabre videos of the Islamic State could only lead the American public to abandon their dangerous isolationist tendencies through the labored efforts of the “free press.”  And so the skilled propagandists swiftly went to work, with the head-chopping Islamic State presented as the greatest threat facing the nation—American intelligence estimates be damned.  And to their credit, the American people were indeed brought along, with nine in ten Americans now holding the Islamic State to be “a serious threat to vital U.S. interests.”

“Vital U.S. interests,” of course, are strictly held to mean the interests of corporate America, which in reality lie in direct opposition to the interests of the majority, even the majority toiling within the belly of the imperial beast.  But not so within the propaganda system.  Within the echo chamber reverberating with the shrill cries of those warning that the Islamic State is fixing to kill us all, a threat to elite class power is twisted into a threat to the sublime American way of life.  That is, a threat to the average Joe and Jane America’s God given right to fire-up the gas-guzzler for the annual pilgrimage down to the Apple store to pay homage to the latest iteration of the iPhone.  And so if a band of U.S. Frankenstein monsters roaming Iraq and Syria are threatening that life, a life of blissful consumption built upon the foundation of cheap oil falling firmly under the control of the U.S. and its clients, “something” clearly must be done.

Of course, the cries for “something” to be done are perhaps only outdone in their ominous undertones by those of leaving “all options on the table”; for the “something” that must be done in a fear-ridden America inevitably involves the bombing of a foreign land and people.  And in the end, or so it goes, doing something is always better than doing nothing.

One wonders what future historians of the American empire will make of the ease with which American elites have been able to repeatedly soothe the rattled American psyche through the delivery of carefully packaged images of American bombs blowing faceless, pixelated figures to bits.  But then again, for the vast majority of Americans, such a digital, distanced reality represents the full extent of their experience with their nation’s favored export.

“The greatest triumph of virtual reality is war,” Sheldon Wolin writes in Democracy Inc.

“War is an action game, played in the living room, or a spectacle on a screen, but, in either case, not actually experienced,” Wolin continues.  “Ordinary life goes on uninterruptedly: work, recreation, professional sports, family vacations.  After 9/11 terrorism becomes another virtual reality, experienced only through its re-created images, its destructiveness (= wonders) absorbed through the spectacle of the occasional and hapless terrorist put on public display.”

And when war is rendered as little more than a digital spectacle one must oblige in order to keep one’s head (literally, as Senator Lindsay Graham would assert), war-weariness can be overcome with staggering haste.  Fear always breeds hostility.

The present public support for the unleashing of yet more imperial barbarism from the single greatest threat to global peace thus represents just the latest evidence of the propaganda system’s enduring triumph.

Ben Schreiner is a writer living in Oregon.  He may be reached at bnschreiner@gmail.com.

Ben Schreiner is the author of A People’s Dictionary to the ‘Exceptional Nation’.  He may be reached at bnschreiner@gmail.com or via his blog.

More articles by:
May 30, 2016
Ron Jacobs
The State of the Left: Many Movements, Too Many Goals?
James Abourezk
The Intricacies of Language
Porfirio Quintano
Hillary, Honduras, and the Murder of My Friend Berta
Patrick Cockburn
Airstrikes on ISIS are Reducing Their Cities to Ruins
Uri Avnery
The Center Doesn’t Hold
Raouf Halaby
The Sailors of the USS Liberty: They, Too, Deserve to Be Honored
Rodrigue Tremblay
Barack Obama’s Legacy: What Happened?
Matt Peppe
Just the Facts: The Speech Obama Should Have Given at Hiroshima
Deborah James
Trade Pacts and Deregulation: Latest Leaks Reveal Core Problem with TISA
Michael Donnelly
Still Wavy After All These Years: Flower Geezer Turns 80
Ralph Nader
The Funny Business of Farm Credit
Paul Craig Roberts
Memorial Day and the Glorification of Past Wars
Colin Todhunter
From Albrecht to Monsanto: A System Not Run for the Public Good Can Never Serve the Public Good
Rivera Sun
White Rose Begins Leaflet Campaigns June 1942
Tom H. Hastings
Field Report from the Dick Cheney Hunting Instruction Manual
Weekend Edition
May 27, 2016
Friday - Sunday
John Pilger
Silencing America as It Prepares for War
Rob Urie
By the Numbers: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are Fringe Candidates
Paul Street
Feel the Hate
Daniel Raventós - Julie Wark
Basic Income Gathers Steam Across Europe
Andrew Levine
Hillary’s Gun Gambit
Jeffrey St. Clair
Hand Jobs: Heidegger, Hitler and Trump
S. Brian Willson
Remembering All the Deaths From All of Our Wars
Dave Lindorff
With Clinton’s Nixonian Email Scandal Deepening, Sanders Must Demand Answers
Pete Dolack
Millions for the Boss, Cuts for You!
Peter Lee
To Hell and Back: Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Gunnar Westberg
Close Calls: We Were Much Closer to Nuclear Annihilation Than We Ever Knew
Karl Grossman
Long Island as a Nuclear Park
Binoy Kampmark
Sweden’s Assange Problem: The District Court Ruling
Robert Fisk
Why the US Dropped Its Demand That Assad Must Go
Martha Rosenberg – Ronnie Cummins
Bayer and Monsanto: a Marriage Made in Hell
Brian Cloughley
Pivoting to War
Stavros Mavroudeas
Blatant Hypocrisy: the Latest Late-Night Bailout of Greece
Arun Gupta
A War of All Against All
Dan Kovalik
NPR, Yemen & the Downplaying of U.S. War Crimes
Randy Blazak
Thugs, Bullies, and Donald J. Trump: The Perils of Wounded Masculinity
Murray Dobbin
Are We Witnessing the Beginning of the End of Globalization?
Daniel Falcone
Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen, an Interview with David Hilfiker
Gloria Jimenez
In Honduras, USAID Was in Bed with Berta Cáceres’ Accused Killers
Kent Paterson
The Old Braceros Fight On
Lawrence Reichard
The Seemingly Endless Indignities of Air Travel: Report from the Losing Side of Class Warfare
Peter Berllios
Bernie and Utopia
Stan Cox – Paul Cox
Indonesia’s Unnatural Mud Disaster Turns Ten
Linda Pentz Gunter
Obama in Hiroshima: Time to Say “Sorry” and “Ban the Bomb”
George Souvlis
How the West Came to Rule: an Interview with Alexander Anievas
Julian Vigo
The Government and Your i-Phone: the Latest Threat to Privacy
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail