FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Living Poor in San Francisco

by

“I was born and raised in San Francisco but had to move to Oakland to provide for my young twins,” 24-year old working single mother Jaquayla Burton told me. “I wanted to stay near my family in the city I love and I could have if wages were higher, if job opportunities were available and if housing was more affordable.”

Jaquayla is not alone. This is a tale of growing inequality in one of the wealthiest cities in America and it just doesn’t have to be this way.

San Francisco is one of the most beautiful cities in the world resting on the Pacific Ocean with incredibly picturesque landscapes surrounded by plush water inlets and bays.

150 years ago, desperate Chinese laborers described their dream destination as “Gold Mountain.” European adventurers coined the phrase “Paris of the West.” In modern times, it became known simply as “City by the Bay.”

Laid-back locals just say the City and leave it at that.

But no matter what it’s called, everyone agrees it is one of the world’s most gorgeous cities. It is a leading tourist destination and also consistently ranks as one of the best places to live with Bloomberg’s Businessweek placing it at the very top as recently as 2012.

But San Francisco has another distinction placing it atop all others. It is number one with the fastest growing inequality spread between rich and poor anywhere in America.

This is not to disparage those enjoying dramatic increases in their standard of living through the explosion of jobs with Google, Twitter and tech startups lured to the city with big corporate tax incentives.

Rather, the concern is that the economic boom, just like the Pacific’s powerful receding tide, leaves many San Franciscans high and dry.

And the statistics are alarming.

Widening Inequality & Growing Poverty

According to the Public Policy Institute of California and the Stanford Center on Poverty report on Inequality, the some 800,000 residents of San Francisco suffer a poverty rate of 23%. Shockingly, that is almost a quarter of the population.

Another authoritative study by the Brookings Institute released in 2014 confirms the cavernous income gap.

For example, it’s calculated that a San Francisco household in the top 5 percent income range earned almost 17 times as much as a household in the lowest 20 percent.

Referring to the Brookings’ data, San Francisco writer Barbara Koh noted that the same trend is occurring in cities across America but “San Francisco’s income gap is distinctive, however, because our rich are uber-rich and getting richer. The $353,500 income of San Francisco’s wealthiest 5 percent of households is higher than their counterparts in any other big city.”

As Koh indicates, the income gap trend is indeed rising all across America but largely because the incomes of the lower 20% are plunging more dramatically downward than in San Francisco where even the meager $10.74 minimum wage, actually the highest in the country, helps ever so slightly to bail out struggling families.

It’s worth noting that the national minimum wage would actually be $21.72 an hour if it was accurately adjusted for productivity gains made by workers since 1968.

“Obviously, income from those productivity gains are going to fatten the pockets of employers and stock holders who already have plenty and this is one of the things that contributes to the increasing poverty and wealth disparity in this city, in this state and in this country,” Jessica Bartholow said.

Bartholow is policy expert and legislative advocate for the prestigious California-based Western Center on Law and Poverty.

On a positive note, a progressive San Francisco coalition of community and labor groups just announced a November 2014 ballot proposition supported by the Mayor and ten members of the Board of Supervisors that will steadily raise the minimum wage to $15 by 2018.

This ballot measure does not include any exceptions for workers making tips or for those with company provided healthcare, already a mandatory city requirement for employers. As a result, it is considered the most advanced minimum wage proposal in the country and, if passed, will considerably raise the standard of living of those on the bottom.

This has worked before.

When the great recession of 2008 first hit, San Francisco did better than the rest of California, according to Karl Kramer, campaign co-director of San Francisco Living Wage Coalition. The city had lower unemployment which, he strongly believes, was due to “the flotilla of protective laws like the current minimum wage legislation.”

Indeed, large numbers of low-wage workers with money in their pockets did in fact boost the whole economy by spending widely in local businesses, big and small.

When Mayor Ed Lee* came into office, however, his economic policies were to prioritize hi-tech businesses by dangling large tax subsidies. This lured into the city a highly skilled and highly paid work force that almost immediately set off a housing crisis of rising rents.

The San Francisco Sentinel reports that during the most recent quarter in 2014, “a one bedroom will cost you $2,795, a two bedroom $3,875 and a three bedroom $4,750.”

But this is only one of a host of related problems.

“What gets lost” in this imbalanced economic approach by the Mayor, Kramer tells me, “is reduced emphasis on developing jobs for low-wage workers.” And that takes a toll on working class families who are then forced to leave the city.

It is so wrong that Jaquayla’s family was “forced to leave because of economic hardship,” Bartholow told me.

Asked what her suggestions would be, the legislative advocate immediately responded that city policy should first stop the exodus of working families by making affordable housing more available and by making wages match basic needs.

In fact, she has a point. There are 184,000 San Franciscans living in poverty according to 2011 data. But hardships of soaring rents, for example, also fall on those fortunate enough to have a job, thus creating the new term of “working poor” that has become a permanent part of our vocabulary.

In California, 64% subsisting below the poverty line live in a household with earnings.

Bad Policies Haunt Us Today

There is nothing inevitable about these conditions. They are a result of national and local policies enacted over the last several decades that cut social spending on a vast range of public services like education, food programs for children and subsidies for the elderly.

For example, Bartholow stated, poor families with children eligible for basic needs (CalWORKs) assistance “receive a monthly grant amount that has half of the poverty alleviating power it did 20 years ago.”

Unless an aware and mobilized community and labor coalition representing the majority begins to mobilize as they recently did during the struggle for a $15 minimum wage in San Francisco, things will only worsen.

“It’s going to take a fight,” Kramer tells me, “but it’s a winnable fight” by creating a more liveable, a more fair and a more just vision for our city far different from where San Francisco is now headed.

*The Mayor’s office did not respond to our request for a comment

Carl Finamore lives in the Hunters Point neighborhood of San Francisco which has the highest unemployment and poverty rate in the city. He is Machinist Lodge 1781 delegate to the San Francisco Labor Council, AFL-CIO.

Carl Finamore is Machinist Lodge 1781 delegate, San Francisco Labor Council, AFL-CIO. He can be reached at local1781@yahoo.com

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
May 27, 2016
Friday - Sunday
John Pilger
Silencing America as It Prepares for War
Rob Urie
By the Numbers: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are Fringe Candidates
Paul Street
Feel the Hate
Daniel Raventós - Julie Wark
Basic Income Gathers Steam Across Europe
Andrew Levine
Hillary’s Gun Gambit
Jeffrey St. Clair
Hand Jobs: Heidegger, Hitler and Trump
S. Brian Willson
Remembering All the Deaths From All of Our Wars
Dave Lindorff
With Clinton’s Nixonian Email Scandal Deepening, Sanders Must Demand Answers
Pete Dolack
Millions for the Boss, Cuts for You!
Gunnar Westberg
Close Calls: We Were Much Closer to Nuclear Annihilation Than We Ever Knew
Peter Lee
To Hell and Back: Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Karl Grossman
Long Island as a Nuclear Park
Binoy Kampmark
Sweden’s Assange Problem: The District Court Ruling
Robert Fisk
Why the US Dropped Its Demand That Assad Must Go
Martha Rosenberg – Ronnie Cummins
Bayer and Monsanto: a Marriage Made in Hell
Brian Cloughley
Pivoting to War
Stavros Mavroudeas
Blatant Hypocrisy: the Latest Late-Night Bailout of Greece
Arun Gupta
A War of All Against All
Dan Kovalik
NPR, Yemen & the Downplaying of U.S. War Crimes
Randy Blazak
Thugs, Bullies, and Donald J. Trump: The Perils of Wounded Masculinity
Murray Dobbin
Are We Witnessing the Beginning of the End of Globalization?
Daniel Falcone
Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen, an Interview with David Hilfiker
Gloria Jimenez
In Honduras, USAID Was in Bed with Berta Cáceres’ Accused Killers
Kent Paterson
The Old Braceros Fight On
Lawrence Reichard
The Seemingly Endless Indignities of Air Travel: Report from the Losing Side of Class Warfare
Peter Berllios
Bernie and Utopia
Stan Cox – Paul Cox
Indonesia’s Unnatural Mud Disaster Turns Ten
Linda Pentz Gunter
Obama in Hiroshima: Time to Say “Sorry” and “Ban the Bomb”
George Souvlis
How the West Came to Rule: an Interview with Alexander Anievas
Julian Vigo
The Government and Your i-Phone: the Latest Threat to Privacy
Stratos Ramoglou
Why the Greek Economic Crisis Won’t be Ending Anytime Soon
David Price
The 2016 Tour of California: Notes on a Big Pharma Bike Race
Dmitry Mickiewicz
Barbarous Deforestation in Western Ukraine
Rev. William Alberts
The United Methodist Church Up to Its Old Trick: Kicking the Can of Real Inclusion Down the Road
Patrick Bond
Imperialism’s Junior Partners
Mark Hand
The Trouble with Fracking Fiction
Priti Gulati Cox
Broken Green: Two Years of Modi
Marc Levy
Sitrep: Hometown Unwelcomes Vietnam Vets
Lorenzo Raymond
Why Nonviolent Civil Resistance Doesn’t Work (Unless You Have Lots of Bombs)
Ed Kemmick
New Book Full of Amazing Montana Women
Michael Dickinson
Bye Bye Legal High in Backwards Britain
Missy Comley Beattie
Wanted: Daddy or Mommy in Chief
Ed Meek
The Republic of Fear
Charles R. Larson
Russian Women, Then and Now
David Yearsley
Elgar’s Hegemony: the Pomp of Empire
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail