There's no place like CounterPunch, it's just that simple. And as the radical space within the "alternative media"(whatever that means) landscape continues to shrink, sanctuaries such as CounterPunch become all the more crucial for our political, intellectual, and moral survival. Add to that the fact that CounterPunch won't inundate you with ads and corporate propaganda. So it should be clear why CounterPunch needs your support: so it can keep doing what it's been doing for nearly 25 years. As CP Editor, Jeffrey St. Clair, succinctly explained, "We lure you in, and then punch you in the kidneys." Pleasant and true though that may be, the hard-working CP staff is more than just a few grunts greasing the gears of the status quo.
So come on, be a pal, make a tax deductible donation to CounterPunch today to support our annual fund drive, if you have already donated we thank you! If you haven't, do it because you want to. Do it because you know what CounterPunch is worth. Do it because CounterPunch needs you. Every dollar is tax-deductible. (PayPal accepted)
Ben Bernanke has an inflation problem. There isn’t any inflation and that’s a problem.
In the last 12 months, consumer prices have risen a mere 1.1 percent which–according to Bloomberg–“matches the smallest increase since records began in 1960”. At the same time, the velocity of money (how fast money changes hands) has slowed to a crawl, in fact, it’s slower than anytime since 1959. Naturally, this lethal combo (low inflation-slow velocity) has impacted growth which just clocked in at a pitiable 1.8 percent. If present trends continue, disinflation could turn to outright deflation sometime in the latter half of 2014 leading to further economic deceleration.
But why is low inflation a problem, after all, lower prices mean consumers get more bang for their buck, right? How can that be bad?
It’s bad because low inflation is a sign of stagnation. When demand is weak, there’s little upward pressure on prices. In a deflationary environment, people hold onto their cash figuring that prices will be lower in the future. Hoarding, in turn, leads to reduced borrowing and spending which puts the economy into a nosedive. It’s all bad. That’s why the Fed has an 2 percent inflation target that it tries to maintain by pumping money into the financial system; it’s to incentivize spending by creating inflation.
So why has the Fed failed to hit its inflation target when it’s expanded its balance sheet by more than $2.3 trillion since Quantitative Easing (QE) first began? Hasn’t all that bond buying pushed up prices?
Nope, it hasn’t, and it’s easy to see why. When the Fed creates reserves at the banks (QE) it adds to base money, but that money does not trickle down to the real economy until the worker bees (you and me) take out loans or run up our VISAs. When credit is not expanding (which it isn’t except for student loans and subprime auto loans), activity flags and the economy shifts into low gear. That’s where we are now. The Fed can change this dynamic by boosting “inflation expectations”, which is to say that if people believe the Fed will succeed in raising inflation, then they’ll spend more dough than they would have otherwise. But Bernanke has flopped on that account, too. His recent announcement (that he would scale back on his asset purchases if the economy improved) sent markets plunging, but even worse, it drove a dagger into inflation expectations. Now no one believes the Fed can raise inflation via QE. The damage to the Fed’s credibility is incalculable.
Paul Krugman thinks Bernanke made a “historic mistake” by talking about tapering too soon, but Krugman also thinks he knows how to minimize the fallout. All Bernanke needs to do is convince the markets that he’s crazy. Here’s a clip from Krugman’s blog at the New York Times:
“What’s the point of Fed communication? Mainly it’s not about the specific numbers; it’s about conveying what kind of central bankers we’re dealing with, and hence what they’re likely to do in the future. Talk of extended easy money can help the economy now precisely because it makes the Fed sound like it’s not a conventionally-minded central bank, eager to snatch away the punch bowl; even asset purchases work mainly because they reinforce that impression of unconventionality.”
This post is a follow up from an earlier piece in which Krugman said the Fed must “credibly promise to be irresponsible”. In other words, Bernanke needs convince everyone that he’s seriously lost it and is going to keep his foot on the gas long after the economy has rebounded. That will send consumers racing off to the shopping malls to buy more trinkets before prices rise.
Are you convinced yet?
Of course, there are a few glitches to this theory, like the fact that higher inflation expectations can’t boost spending when people are already broke. Broke is broke. It’s a condition that people experience in an economy where unemployment is high and wages are stagnant or falling. The cost of money (interest rates) doesn’t matter to people who are broke because they’re not taking out a loan anyway so they don’t give a rip. To them, higher inflation just means more cutbacks at the grocery store or shopping center. This is what we’re seeing in Japan, where the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is on track to double the money supply in the next two years but prices are still falling and the economy is still in the grip of deflation. Take a look at this from Reuters:
“Core consumer prices continued to fall and manufacturers forecast further weakness ahead, government data showed on Friday, underscoring the challenges the Bank of Japan, under new Governor Haruhiko Kuroda, faces in meeting its 2-percent inflation target.
“The deflationary trend shows no signs of changing,” said Yuichi Kodama, chief economist at Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance in Tokyo….
“Expectations for deflation, deeply embedded among the public, are very persistent,” Kodama said. “It appears quite difficult for monetary easing implemented by Governor Kuroda to achieve a positive cycle of inflation and economic recovery.”
So, yes, Abenomics has sent stocks into the stratosphere and chopped the yen into mincemeat, but as far as ending deflation, the results are not so good. And the reason is simple, wages in Japan have been drifting lower for the last 20 years and they’re still falling today. Get a load of this from Bloomberg:
“Ending consumer price declines would give companies and households more incentive to borrow, and boost revenue for businesses and the government in a nation that saw its third recession in five years in 2012….
“The key is wages,” said Nobuyasu Atago, principal economist at the Japan Center for Economic Research and a former BOJ official in charge of price data. “Without pay increases, the economy won’t recover and households will only suffer from inflation.” ….
Japan’s main business lobby signaled it won’t endorse pay rises at regular wage negotiations with labor unions this spring, Kyodo News reported Dec. 20. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party is considering tax breaks for companies that raise pay or expand hiring.” (“Japan Learned to Love Deflation in Wage Malaise Facing BOJ”, Bloomberg)
And here’s more from The Economist:
Keidanren, the main big-business lobby, has remained cool, saying it wants to see more sustainable profit growth before its members agree to basic-pay increases, which are harder to reverse than bonus payments.
Masamichi Adachi of J.P. Morgan says overtime and bonus payments are likely to rise before core salaries do. He says that, rather than higher inflation expectations, the country needs higher growth expectations before companies commit to permanent wage increases. As it is, a planned rise in the consumption tax next year is likely to offset some of the effect of a big fiscal stimulus this year, which means growth may flatten in late 2014.
There is a danger, Mr Adachi adds, that the popularity of Mr Abe’s policies will quickly decline if the public perceives they are getting “cost-push” inflation caused by rising prices, rather than “demand-pull” inflation, caused by rising wages. “A reflationary policy is initially quite well received until inflation actually comes.”
Do you see the pattern here? Profits before wages. Bonuses before wages. Growth before wages. Anything before wages. It’s the same in America, except worse. Big Business may recognize the importance of higher wages in revitalizing the economy, but they’re not going to give ground unless someone puts a gun to their head and forces them to comply. Class war takes precedent over everything, even the health of the economy.
Now check this out from economist Frances Coppola who thinks that QE is a big fraud that neither “increases inflation” nor “debases the currency”:
“There is zero chance of domestically-generated inflation while wages are falling, contractionary fiscal policy is depressing real incomes, banks are not lending and corporates are failing to invest. Externally-driven inflation is possible, and we are of course seeing inflation in asset prices as a consequence of QE. But the core trend is disinflation in developed countries – I hesitate to say “deflation”, since inflation is still above zero, but core inflation is on a downwards trend in nearly all developed countries. … “
Repeat: “There is zero chance of domestically-generated inflation while wages are falling.”
Amazing, isn’t it? Bernanke is pumping $85 billion per month into the financial system and the arrow on the inflation-dial is still headed for the red. Unbelievable. Now everyone can see that QE was just another bubble-making farce that has no impact on the real economy at all. The Fed’s credibility is in a shambles.
No wonder Bernanke is thinking about early retirement.
MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. Whitney’s story on how the banks targeted blacks for toxic subprime mortgages appears in the May issue of CounterPunch magazine. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.