Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! We only shake you down once a year, but when we do we really mean it. It costs a lot to keep the site afloat, and our growing audience, well over TWO million unique viewers a month, eats up a lot of bandwidth — and bandwidth isn’t free. We aren’t supported by corporate donors, advertisers or big foundations. We survive solely on your support.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Medal of Dishonor

by Rev. WILLIAM E. ALBERTS

Drone warfare has become one of the key weapons in the United States government’s global “war on terror.”  But drones especially present a moral challenge for all Americans in this manufactured war.  They are the glaring tip of American imperialism, and must be camouflaged to ensure a supportive citizenry.  Thus The Distinguished Warfare Medal has been created, ostensibly to award “the extraordinary achievements” of “pilots” of unmanned Predator and Reaper drones, explains outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

Located in remote trailers, often in the United States, they nonetheless “make a true difference in combat operations,” Panetta continues, adding, “They remove the enemy from the field of battle.” (“A New Medal Honors Drone Pilots and Computer Experts,” By Thom Shanker, The New York Times, Feb. 14, 2013)  This award is not just about drone pilots.  It is more about inducing Americans into equating the medal, and thus illegal drone warfare, with morality.  Such a ”distinguished” medal is especially needed to sanitize the war crime of extinguishing the lives of innocent human beings.

“They remove the enemy from the field of battle.”  The enemy?”  The Obama administration “counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously (italics added) proving them innocent,” reported The New York Times. (“Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will,” By Jo Becker and Scott Shane, May 29, 2012)  This blatant immoral policy has resulted in thousands of innocent civilians being killed and injured by drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.   So-called “terrorists” are denied due process and killed, including Americans, for daring to resist the United States’ invasion and occupation of their countries, propping up oppressive governments, and controlling and exploiting  their nations’ resources with its worldwide military presence and economic power.  Ironically, this criminal drone warfare does not make the U.S. safer, but rather creates countless enemies, guaranteeing a permanent “war on terror,” and of course, with endless profit and power for America’s political/military/industrial/religious complex.

“The field of battle?”  It is often a wedding ceremony, a funeral, a public place, a house, a village, a car, a farmer’s field—and always the sky, with drones hovering overhead 24 hours a day, turning the heavens into a terror-filled hell.   Pentagon- and C.I.A.-created, illegal “field[s] of battle,” oblivious to America’s violations of other countries’ national sovereignty.

The Distinguished Medal of Warfare itself symbolizes not heroic “extraordinary achievements,” but lawless American global hegemony.  An almost 2-inches tall brass pendant, in the form of a globe encircled by a wreath, in the center an eagle, framed in the background by a diamond shape which “symbolizes the four corners of the globe, representing the operational reach of our armed forces in the defense of liberty and justice.” (“DoD mints new medal for drone pilots and cyber warriors,” By Sean Gallagher, arstechnica.com, Feb. 13, 2023)  Why does America need some 900 military bases in 130 countries “in defense of liberty and justice?” (See “Ron Paul says U.S. has military personnel in 130 nations and 900 overseas bases,” Tampa Bay Times, Politifact.com, Sept. 12, 2011)  It is obviously not about defending “liberty and justice” in all these countries, but about making sure the world is, and remains, a fertile ground for American privilege and power.  Thus, the American eagle, long symbolizing the spiritual power of prayer by indigenous peoples, has become a bird of prey.

Greatly needed is the indigenous people’s belief that “the eagle was the chosen master of the skies by the Creator . . . because eagles generally fly at a higher altitude than most other birds,” which “gives them a unique perspective (italics added) that is unmatched by any other bird . . . a messenger for the Creator . . . carrying the prayers of human beings from the earth;” and they are also “the symbol of honor, bravery, love, friendship and mystical powers for the Indian Nations.” (“Native American Eagle Symbols, www.kwintessential.co.uk, Mar. 29, 2010; “What are some things eagles represent?, answers.yahoo.com)

Such a “unique perspective” would enable many citizens to transcend egocentric American exceptionalism, and experience the vision of what it would be like to have foreign military bases in, and surrounding, America, controlling them and their resources, with drones hovering overhead, killing and maiming protesting, and non-protesting, loved ones and other citizens—transforming heaven from a boundless source for prayer and reflection into a confining nightmare of terror reigning down.

Why are many in America, with its professions of Christian and democratic values, oblivious to our government’s glaring criminal foreign policy?  Philosopher Noam Chomsky provides an answer.  “We own the world,” he said.  As an example, he gave the repeated threats of the U.S. and Israel to bomb Iran, saying, “There happens to be something called the UN Charter which says that—in Article 2—the threat or use of force in international affairs is a crime.  . . .  Does anyone care?”  He continued, “No, because we’re an outlaw state by definition, or to be more precise our threats and use of force are not foreign, they’re indigenous because we own the world.” (“We Own The World,” Adapted from a Z Media Institute talk June 2007, Z Magazine, Jan. 2008)

Another example of American hegemony cited by Professor Chomsky was former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice saying that “the solution to the problem in Iraq . . . is quite obvious, ‘Withdraw all foreign forces and withdraw all foreign arms’ . . . she was not referring to U.S. forces, she was referring to Iranian forces and Iranian arms.  And that makes sense, too,” Chomsky explained, “on the assumption that we own the world because, since we own the world U.S. forces cannot be foreign forces anywhere.”  He concluded, “It’s all too easy to continue with this indefinitely.  Just pick your topic.  It’s a good exercise to try.  This simple principle, ‘we own the world,’ is sufficient to explain a lot of the discussion about foreign affairs.” (Ibid) 

The attempt to dress drones in morality, to fend off critics, is seen in the Obama administration now being receptive to a “judicial review” of selected strikes, i.e. the oversight of an independent drone court.  Such a drone court would give special consideration before approving the denial of due process to and targeting of Americans. (“Debating a Court to Vet Drone Strikes,” By Scott Shane, The New York Times, Feb. 8, 2013)

The proposed drone court is an attempt to cover the immorality of drones with black robes; but these extrajudicial killings still represent a lawless foreign policy of Murder, Incorporated.  Nobel Peace Prize winner Archbishop Desmond Tutu laid bare the hypocrisy of a proposed drone court:

Do the United States and its people really want to tell those of us who live in the rest of the world that our lives are not of the same value as yours?  That President Obama can sign off on a decision to kill us with less worry about judicial scrutiny than if the target is an American?  Would your Supreme Court want to tell humankind that we, like the slave Dred Scott in the 19th century, are not as human as you are?  I cannot believe it.

I used to say of apartheid that it dehumanized its perpetrators as much as, if not more than, its victims.  Your response  as a society to Osama bin Laden and his followers threatens to undermine your moral standards and your humanity.

(“Drones, Kill Lists and Machiavelli,” To the Editor, The New York Times, Feb. 12, 2013)

The immoral use of drones certainly threatens to “undermine [the] moral standards” and “humanity” of drone pilots themselves.  In years to come, they may realize how they have been used to kill and destroy to protect privilege.  Their own honesty will haunt them with the truth of the criminality in which they had participated.

This moral struggle was seen in the Vietnam War, with young Americans, including pilots, psyched into bombing and killing, and burning with napalm, innocent Vietnamese children and families.  In many cases, years later, their own lives were afflicted with guilt and grief, realizing the evil in which they had unknowingly, yet willingly, participated.  They, also, became victims– of their own aggression– mourning the undermining of their own moral standards and humanity.

Drone pilots are reported to be facing similar moral conflicts.  A recent study revealed that “pilots of drone aircraft experience mental health problems like depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress at the same rate as pilots of manned aircraft who are deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.”  While not directly on the battlefield, drone pilots are “witnessing combat violence on live video feeds . . . They witness the carnage,” [and] “manned aircraft pilots don’t do that.”  According to the study, “witnessing . . . the carnage [of their] combat violence” and “working in isolation” create “mental health issues.” (“Drone Pilots Are Found to Get Stress Disorders Much as Those in Combat Do,” By James Dao, The New York Times, Feb. 23, 2013)

Thus, as reported, “The Pentagon has begun taking steps to keep pace with the rapid expansion of drone operations,” by “recently creat[ing] a new medal to honor troops involved in both drone warfare and cyber warfare.”  And,” the story continues, “the Air Force has expanded access to chaplains and therapists for drone operators.” (Ibid)

The mental health problems of drone pilots are believed to be more likely the result of the violation of their moral health.  Their anxiety and depression are signs of health, not illness—and a commentary on the immorality of America’s foreign policy.  The last thing they need are chaplains and therapists to make them feel better and adjust to the criminal killing and injuring of other human beings.  Here, more chaplains and their organizations must become prophets and speak the truth of The Golden Rule and justice to America’s imperialistic power, rather than accommodating carnage and conquest as chaplains of the status quo.

It is time for chaplains and other clergy especially to respond to the voices of the oppressed, not those of the oppressor.  Like the voice in the Bible that reminds us, “When all the prisoners of the land are crushed under foot, when human rights are perverted in the presence of the Most High, when one’s case is subverted—does not the Lord see it?” (Lamentations 3: 34-36)  And time to hear and follow another timeless voice that declares, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” (Matthew 5: 9)

Rev. William E. Alberts, Ph.D., a former hospital chaplain at Boston Medical Center, is a diplomate in the College of Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy.  Both a Unitarian Universalist and United Methodist minister, he has written research reports, essays and articles on racism, war, politics, religion and pastoral care.  His book, A Hospital Chaplain at the Crossroads of Humanity, is available on Amazon.com.  His e-mail address is wm.alberts@gmail.com

Rev. William E. Alberts, Ph.D., a former hospital chaplain at Boston Medical Center, is both a Unitarian Universalist and United Methodist minister. His new book, The Counterpunching Minister (who couldn’t be “preyed” away) is now published and available on Amazon.com. The book’s Foreword, Drawing the Line, is written by Counterpunch editor, Jeffrey St. Clair. Alberts is also author of A Hospital Chaplain at the Crossroads of Humanity, which “demonstrates what top-notch pastoral care looks like, feels like, maybe even smells like,” states the review in the Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling. His e-mail address is wm.alberts@gmail.com.

More articles by:

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

September 29, 2016
Robert Fisk
The Butcher of Qana: Shimon Peres Was No Peacemaker
James Rose
Politics in the Echo Chamber: How Trump Becomes President
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Vice Grip on the Presidential Debates
Daniel Kato
Rethinking the Race over Race: What Clinton Should do Now About ‘Super-Predators’
Peter Certo
Clinton’s Awkward Stumbles on Trade
Fran Shor
Demonizing the Green Party Vote
Rev. William Alberts
Trump’s Road Rage to the White House
Luke O'Brien
Because We Couldn’t Have Sanders, You’ll Get Trump
Michael J. Sainato
How the Payday Loan Industry is Obstructing Reform
Robert Fantina
You Can’t Have War Without Racism
Gregory Barrett
Bad Theater at the United Nations (Starring Kerry, Power, and Obama
James A Haught
The Long, Long Journey to Female Equality
Thomas Knapp
US Military Aid: Thai-ed to Torture
Jack Smith
Must They be Enemies? Russia, Putin and the US
Gilbert Mercier
Clinton vs Trump: Lesser of Two Evils or the Devil You Know
Tom H. Hastings
Manifesting the Worst Old Norms
George Ella Lyons
This Just in From Rancho Politico
September 28, 2016
Eric Draitser
Stop Trump! Stop Clinton!! Stop the Madness (and Let Me Get Off)!
Ted Rall
The Thrilla at Hofstra: How Trump Won the Debate
Robert Fisk
Cliché and Banality at the Debates: Trump and Clinton on the Middle East
Patrick Cockburn
Cracks in the Kingdom: Saudi Arabia Rocked by Financial Strains
Lowell Flanders
Donald Trump, Islamophobia and Immigrants
Shane Burley
Defining the Alt Right and the New American Fascism
Jan Oberg
Ukraine as the Border of NATO Expansion
Ramzy Baroud
Ban Ki-Moon’s Legacy in Palestine: Failure in Words and Deeds
David Swanson
How We Could End the Permanent War State
Sam Husseini
Debate Night’s Biggest Lie Was Told by Lester Holt
Laura Carlsen
Ayotzinapa’s Message to the World: Organize!
Binoy Kampmark
The Triumph of Momentum: Re-Electing Jeremy Corbyn
David Macaray
When the Saints Go Marching In
Seth Oelbaum
All Black Lives Will Never Matter for Clinton and Trump
Adam Parsons
Standing in Solidarity for a Humanity Without Borders
Cesar Chelala
The Trump Bubble
September 27, 2016
Louisa Willcox
The Tribal Fight for Nature: From the Grizzly to the Black Snake of the Dakota Pipeline
Paul Street
The Roots are in the System: Charlotte and Beyond
Jeffrey St. Clair
Idiot Winds at Hofstra: Notes on the Not-So-Great Debate
Mark Harris
Clinton, Trump, and the Death of Idealism
Mike Whitney
Putin Ups the Ante: Ceasefire Sabotage Triggers Major Offensive in Aleppo
Anthony DiMaggio
The Debates as Democratic Façade: Voter “Rationality” in American Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Punishing the Punished: the Torments of Chelsea Manning
Paul Buhle
Why “Snowden” is Important (or How Kafka Foresaw the Juggernaut State)
Jack Rasmus
Hillary’s Ghosts
Brian Cloughley
Billions Down the Afghan Drain
Lawrence Davidson
True Believers and the U.S. Election
Matt Peppe
Taking a Knee: Resisting Enforced Patriotism
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]