FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

First as Tragedy, Then as Tragedy. Ecological Imperialism and the Destruction of Families.

In recent years, critical journalists and scholars of climate change and society have urged academics and activists to understand climate change through the lens of class power. [1][2] Such a lens would force recognition of the real, material meaning of the existential threat that climate change poses to humanity; a threat strongly mediated by the housing and food of communities in which people make their lives. Those who lack basic rights to housing and food will suffer first and worst. As the catastrophe unfolds, in greater and greater numbers the poor and oppressed will attempt to escape their homeland to avoid violent conflict, rising seas, and ecological calamity.

Climate change and related ecological crises that occur on local and regional scales already drive conflict and migration in our world. The North African refugees, who were rejected by Italy’s right wing, anti-immigrant government, fled nations ravaged by drought and two centuries of colonialism and proxy wars—often to control access to the very petro resources that drive warming weather patterns.[3][4]

Europe’s ethnocentric panic and corresponding rise of anti-immigrant parties erupted from an anti-Muslim animus that enabled Europe’s white majority to overlook the catastrophic drought, water shortages, and agricultural failures that fueled early conflict in Syria and elsewhere in the region. Instead, conflict in the Middle East is continuously labeled as intractable or driven by backwards ideologies. As such, refugees who emanate from the region are seldom understood as victims of climate injustice who deserve not only refuge, but reparations.[5]

Similarly, in the United States, the neo-fascist Trump Administration’s predictable and revolting policy of family separation cannot be understood without the knowledge that many of the weeping children fled Honduras, a nation where a conservative coup, supported by a Democratic administration, killed hundreds of local environmental activists who refused to capitulate to corporate land grabs on increasingly precious ecosystems.[6][7] Understood this way, the manufactured crisis on the Texas-Mexico border is a terrifying and instructive window into the playbook for how the criminal nations of the Global North will handle the fleeing refugees from the 21st Century’s great ecological crisis.

How does a perilous 2,000 mile journey, carrying a toddler, become a rational decision for a Honduran mother? To answer that question requires moving beyond a simple denunciation of the neo-fascist Trump administration and toward an investigation of decades of neo-colonialism and ecological plundering. To be sure, it is necessary to emphasize the unique terror of the Trump administration. The departure from neoliberal rhetoric and policy management espoused by previous administrations towards a more brutal neo-fascist modus operandi warrants discussion. Nevertheless, to defeat neo-fascism requires an abolishment of the structural frameworks and institutions that neoliberal policy managers and political wonks favor.

Unless you hold the untenable belief that the election of Trump and the growth of anti-immigrant groups elsewhere in the global North are mere cosmic coincidences, then pleas to return to the good old days of 2015 will only ensure more of Trump’s ilk. Incantations to some non-existent, higher American ethos—the “we are not this”—line of argument, encourages a strange cognitive dissonance in the minds of most moderates and liberals. Indeed, are we supposed to believe that crying children or grieving parents are new tragedies at immigrant detention centers?

Hundreds of thousands of people “liked” former First Lady Laura Bush’s tweet and op-ed that condemned this most recent iteration of racist U.S. imperialism. “The reason for these separations” Mrs. Bush posits, “is a zero-tolerance policy for their parents, who are accused of illegally crossing our borders.” [8]

This is not an analysis. It would be equally circular and impotent to argue that the reason for innocent men dying by lethal injection is a policy that tolerates lethal injection. Thus, while Bush’s sentiment is fair and seemingly honest enough, her words serve little purpose. Moderates and liberals would do well to remember that her husband created ICE, the gestapo-esque, unchecked “enforcement agency” that has violently separated families since 2003, and done so with bipartisan support.

As we move into an era where climate migration and asylum seeking is expected to triple refugee intake in Europe alone, right-wing authoritarians will likely look to ICE and the U.S. Border Patrol for guidance on how to more efficiently destroy families. [9] Democrats who do not speak of climate justice purposefully turn a blind eye to ecological imperialism. They would leave in place the institutional and structural arrangements that made this most recent atrocity possible and only help to ensure that future despots have more examples of right-wing terror in their repertoire.

As we careen into the ominous geological epoch collectively referred to as the Anthropocene, the double pincer of pillage and fortress are now the guiding framework for the survival of the dominant white majority within advanced capitalist nations. [10] This is the ethos of an ecological imperialism: exploit resources and labor for profit, consume them for national economic surplus, pollute elsewhere (preferably in poor countries), and do nothing to make amends. Because such a brutal ethos dominates U.S. international policy, the powerful will continue to ignore the suffering and deaths of those who must make life or death decisions now and in the near future.

Some may seek solace in the idea that the ecological crisis and climate change represent the final contradiction of capitalism, and will (depending on one’s perspective) destroy capitalism for the greater good or induce rational, eco-friendly management of the capitalist world system. These positions disregard the fact that inaction on social and climate justice stems not from technological inefficiency or mere lack of political consensus, but instead originates from actors who manufacture consent in order to maintain the status quo. This appeal works to easily convince white, affluent males who, as survey research conducted by environmental sociologists consistently demonstrates, are substantially less likely to view climate change as real or as a problem in need of serious addressment. Put simply, those relatively powerful few who benefit most from the status quo are the least likely to wish for it to change.

Our world and our children deserve better than meek pseudo-solutions. Critical scholars and activists must work together to uncover the kind of radical change required to dismantle the inter-locking systems of oppression at the root of interrelated crises of climate, ecology, and human migration.

Notes

[1] Naomi Klein, 2014. This Changes Everything. Simon and Schuster.
[2] Andreas Malm, 2017. The Progress of this Storm. Verso Books.
[3] “Weak and exhausted, rejected refugees close to Spain arrival.” 2018. By Ruairi Casey.
[4] Drought hits Ethiopia, Sudan and Eritrea – areas already classified as emergency https://martinplaut.wordpress.com/2015/12/18/drought-hits-ethiopia-sudan-and-eritrea-areas-already-classified-as-emergency/
[5] Climate change is making the Arab world more miserable. 2018. https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2018/05/31/climate-change-is-making-the-arab-world-more-miserable
[6] How Hillary Clinton Militarized US Policy in Honduras. Tim Shorrock. 2016. https://www.thenation.com/article/how-hillary-clinton-militarized-us-policy-in-honduras/
[7] Honduras elites blamed for violence against environmental activists. 20https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/31/honduras-environmental-activists-global-witness-violence-berta-caceres
[8] Without using those words, of course.
[9] Devastating climate change could lead to 1m migrants a year entering EU by 2100. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/21/devastating-climate-change-could-see-one-million-migrants-a-year-entering-eu-by-2100
[10] Welcome to the Anthropocene. Stockholm Resilience Center. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-videos/2012-04-12-welcome-to-the-anthropocene.html

More articles by:

Timothy P. Clark is a teacher, researcher and graduate student at North Carolina State University.

September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail