FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Fanon’s Knife and Puerto Rico

by

Photo by Norman B. Leventhal Map | CC BY 2.0

Colonialism only loosens its hold when the knife is at its throat.

–Frantz Fanon

There are many reasons to oppose colonialism. And there are many images which seer into the mind the utterly destructive nature of colonialism. My own favorite example is a horrific picture from the “Belgian” Congo of a despondent Congolese man on the sunny porch of some Euro-style home looking with total forlornness at the severed hands and feet of his children. As was policy at the time, they probably did not work hard enough for the rapacious chocolatiers and paid the price with their limbs. Only one word emerged from my lips the first time I saw that picture: revolution. This is what the word was meant for. No human relationship that so devalues a child’s life (and by extension, their parents’ and their entire culture) deserves to stand. It must be destroyed forever. Fanon’s knife needs to be drawn on occasion.

Some might say the recent Puerto Rico crisis is nowhere near the alarming brutality of those times. Regularly counseled patience and indoctrinated to believe the US ultimately has its interests at heart, too many Puertoricans have abandoned their own dignity to apologize for the relationships´ many failures. There are now more Puertoricans on the mainland (4.9 million) than living on the island (3.5) and PR has more people than 21 US states. So one would think the news of Hurricane Maria would be regular, the media coverage vigorous, and the convoys of aid immediate. No such luck. 1.5 million people now lack potable water. Since last week. The pictures of devastation are sobering. And as of last night (the 26th), the first reported deaths due to generators failing (there still is no electricity) have been relayed. This is an enormous crisis. There are many who suspect that there is no surprise here. That the slow starvation of Puertoricans out of their homes, over to the US where they will then “assilmilate” and call themselves “Americans” proudly while the vultures buy and chop up the island into manageable pieces for their rich cronies, has been the goal for years and is de facto the plan. There will be plenty of quislings to help them, too. If we needed any more proof (we really don´t) of the US attitude and intentions to PR, it´s here today.

But what are the options? A bit of historical context might illuminate the problem a bit.

When the US took over Puerto Rico in 1898, Puertoricans fed themselves. Their economy was primarily agricultural. Around 40% of the land was given over to coffee, 32% for growing food for local consumption, 15% to sugar and 1% for tobacco. Over 90% of the farms and agricultural resources were owned by local Puertoricans. Within a few years, US tariffs required that Puertorican coffee had to be sent to the US before it could be sold in Europe. The 1899 hurricane and the adoption of US currency on the island was the death knell of Puertorican coffee production. US companies then began buying up land and soon sugar became the dominant crop, production increasing by an incredible 1200% by 1929 with 80% owned by US sugar companies. In the years between 1899-1929, unemployment went from 17% – 36% with ¼ to a third of workers unemployed most of the year. Eventually local food production collapsed and export dominated agricultural production became the norm. By 1940, 80% “of all farmland was owned by large corporations or landlords with 500 acres or more.” (Perez, 1976, pp. 6-7). Thus, during the Great Depression and up to the Second World War, Puertoricans were dirt poor, dependent upon the largess of the US for food and other resources amid a remarkable set of political machinations which mandated English, actually banned Spanish, and in open correspondence its overlords regarded locals as  “mongrels” and “cannibals” whose “race mixing” as unsettling.

Growing during this time were a class of “pitiyanquis” (little Yankees), the “quislings” of PR who managed to ingratiate themselves to the US and benefit as minor officials in the local government, whose positions were always at the mercy of their obsequisness to their colonial masters. They morphed into the pro-statehood and pro-commonwealth parties who couldn´t imagine living without their connection to the US and whose descendants remain dominant in PR politics to this day. It is a classic colonial mindset Fanon would have recognized. And deplored.

But once upon a time there was resistance. The first was the independence strand within the Puerto Rico Union Party which also had statehood and local autonomy trends within it. After the 1917 Jones Act was passed, the Union Party broke into factions of which the Nationalist Party (formed in 1922) took the banner of full independence. The Socialist Party had left and right wing trends which eventually also ended up splitting into a Liberal Party (the left trend, fully in favor of independence) and a SP which joined forces with the Republican Party (founded in 1899 and assimilationist). It was the charismatic Pedro Albizu Campos who led the Nationalist Party into challenging the corrupt alliance of the SP and the Republicans and forcefully advocating for independence. However, years of suppression by the dominant US-backed local government leading to massacres, imprisonment, repression of Nationalist speakers, and finally COINTELPRO disruption of ANY independent movement all led to a conclusion many Puertoricans quickly absorbed: advocating for independence can lead to brutal suppression or even death.  Joining up with the US, keeping one´s head low and subserviently accepting US domination of all aspects of life can lead to safety within the confines of a colonial relationship. To this day, this sentiment prevails, with emotional support for independentistas high but practical political support always going to the deferred parties of the status quo. No matter how many referenda are held, Puertoricans back down, fearing being cast adrift without help. Just like they are now.

As of this week, 80% of Puerto Rico´s agricultural sector has been destroyed. It´s electric grid is dead. Potable water is scarce and, already laboring under the crushing neo-liberal regime of debt repayment (aka squeezing blood from a plantain) with a US-appointed fiscal control board fully committed to the Greecification of PR, prospects for the average Puertorican look awful. As if it wasn´t bad enough. Schools have closed, unemployment is already 12%, there is a 46% poverty rate and, with a median income of less than $20,000, Puertoricans have an income rate LOWER than the poorest US state, Mississippi. Puerto Rico is a broken colony, with a broken people whose imaginations seem to have died. Statehooders will cry and beg their masters asserting that liberation is “too risky” and they´ll continue to drink off the rapidly drying teat of colonial milk cows who will be buying up more land and pushing out more people, year after year. But this is unsustainable.

So, is the US just waiting for all the people in Puerto Rico to just leave or die so they can buy up all the land for rich people to play in their newly concrete fortified hotels 9 months a year? I don´t know, but it sure appears that way from where I and many other Puertoricans I have spoken with stand. And remember, the hurricane season is not over, and the storms are getting bigger. If this doesn´t wake us up, what will?

Nevertheless, for the immediate future some things are changing, even as I write this (perhaps this Administration is getting beaned over the head enough to finally respond): apparently Sen. McCain has said a repeal of the Jones Act is long overdue and the USNS Comfort has just been sent.

But the long-term future of Puerto Rico looks bleak, in fact, very bleak unless Puertoricans unite to claim their unique identity and reclaim their island. It is time that a vibrant, revolutionary movement arise to demand what was stolen years ago: our independence and with it, our self-respect. We cannot continue to be beggars in our own land crying for help when disaster strikes while the land is bought from under our feet and the resources privatized.

Time to end the colonial relationship once and for all. ¡Viva Puerto Rico libre!

More articles by:

José M. Tirado is a Puertorican poet, Buddhist priest and political writer living in Hafnarfjorður, Iceland, known for its elves, “hidden people” and lava fields. His articles and poetry have been featured in CounterPunch, Cyrano´s Journal, The Galway Review, Dissident Voice, La Respuesta, Op-Ed News, among others. He can be reached at tirado.jm@gmail.com.    

Weekend Edition
February 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Richard D. Wolff
Capitalism as Obstacle to Equality and Democracy: the US Story
Paul Street
Where’s the Beef Stroganoff? Eight Sacrilegious Reflections on Russiagate
Jeffrey St. Clair
They Came, They Saw, They Tweeted
Andrew Levine
Their Meddlers and Ours
Charles Pierson
Nuclear Nonproliferation, American Style
Joseph Essertier
Why Japan’s Ultranationalists Hate the Olympic Truce
W. T. Whitney
US and Allies Look to Military Intervention in Venezuela
John Laforge
Maybe All Threats of Mass Destruction are “Mentally Deranged”
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: an American Reckoning
David Rosen
For Some Reason, Being White Still Matters
Robert Fantina
Nikki Haley: the U.S. Embarrassment at the United Nations
Joyce Nelson
Why Mueller’s Indictments Are Hugely Important
Joshua Frank
Pearl Jam, Will You Help Stop Sen. Tester From Destroying Montana’s Public Lands?
Dana E. Abizaid
The Attack on Historical Perspective
Conn Hallinan
Immigration and the Italian Elections
George Ochenski
The Great Danger of Anthropocentricity
Pete Dolack
China Can’t Save Capitalism from Environmental Destruction
Joseph Natoli
Broken Lives
Manuel García, Jr.
Why Did Russia Vote For Trump?
Geoff Dutton
One Regime to Rule Them All
Torkil Lauesen – Gabriel Kuhn
Radical Theory and Academia: a Thorny Relationship
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: The Work of Persuasion
Thomas Klikauer
Umberto Eco and Germany’s New Fascism
George Burchett
La Folie Des Grandeurs
Howard Lisnoff
Minister of War
Eileen Appelbaum
Why Trump’s Plan Won’t Solve the Problems of America’s Crumbling Infrastructure
Ramzy Baroud
More Than a Fight over Couscous: Why the Palestinian Narrative Must Be Embraced
Jill Richardson
Mass Shootings Shouldn’t Be the Only Time We Talk About Mental Illness
Jessicah Pierre
Racism is Killing African American Mothers
Steve Horn
Wyoming Now Third State to Propose ALEC Bill Cracking Down on Pipeline Protests
David Griscom
When ‘Fake News’ is Good For Business
Barton Kunstler
Brainwashed Nation
Griffin Bird
I’m an Eagle Scout and I Don’t Want Pipelines in My Wilderness
Edward Curtin
The Coming Wars to End All Wars
Missy Comley Beattie
Message To New Activists
Jonah Raskin
Literary Hubbub in Sonoma: Novel about Mrs. Jack London Roils the Faithful
Binoy Kampmark
Frontiersman of the Internet: John Perry Barlow
Chelli Stanley
The Mirrors of Palestine
James McEnteer
How Brexit Won World War Two
Ralph Nader
Absorbing the Irresistible Consumer Reports Magazine
Cesar Chelala
A Word I Shouldn’t Use
Louis Proyect
Marx at the Movies
Osha Neumann
A White Guy Watches “The Black Panther”
Stephen Cooper
Rebel Talk with Nattali Rize: the Interview
David Yearsley
Market Music
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail