FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Donald’s Fury and North Korea’s Fire

by

“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”

President Donald Trump,  August 8, 2017

So:  the day after . . . .

“The Korean People’s Army strategic force is now carefully examining the operational plan for making an enveloping fire at the areas around Guam with medium-to-long-range strategic ballistic rocket Hwasong-12 in order to contain the US major military bases on Guam, including the Andersen Air Force base.”

North Korean News Agency, August 9, 2017

The Supreme Leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un is probably psychotic, as it appears from his public statements that he’s completely unhinged and devoid of any sense of reality.  So what other nation’s fairly supreme leader does he remind you of?

At least Kim doesn’t try to run his country and convey personal insults and peculiar international policies by tweeting ridiculous remarks in the early morning hours.  He confines himself to pontificating about world affairs in periodic official videos which are regarded with various degrees of horror, amusement and foreboding by most of the world, and a mix of outrage and paternalistic condescension by the US Administration.

One of his pronouncements in March 2016 was a lulu, even by his standards, and might possibly have given pause for thought in the Pentagon as well as Mar-a-Lago.  He delivered a warning that “If the American imperialists provoke us a bit, we will not hesitate to slap them a pre-emptive nuclear strike. The United States must choose!  It’s up to you whether the nation called the United States exists on this planet or not.” But this didn’t seem to have any effect on the US, which continued to poke insults at the prickly Kim.

Then a year later US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson “ruled out negotiations with North Korea, saying talks ‘can only be achieved by denuclearizing, giving up their weapons of mass destruction’.”

That was pretty forthright, but in May 2017 some carefully considered statements by President Trump included the observations that Mr Kim is “a pretty smart cookie” and that “If it would be appropriate for me to meet with him, I would — absolutely. I would be honored to do it.”

Are we missing something here?  The White House spokesman, Sean Spicer, who was sacked for failing to be a pretty smart cookie, thought that there might be something slightly strange about his president’s declarations and declared that Washington wanted to see North Korea end its provocative behavior immediately and “clearly conditions are not there right now.”  But what message did that send to loopy Kim?  Because Spicer also said that Kim had “obviously managed to lead a country forward. Despite the obvious concerns that we and so many other people have, he is a young person to be leading a country with nuclear weapons.”

What was Kim supposed to make of that absurdly patronizing remark?  He is certainly six years younger than France’s President Macron (and Donald Trump junior), and the same age as Eric Trump, but if there is one thing that the North Korean Supreme Leader doesn’t want to be told it is that he is “a young person to be leading a country with nuclear weapons.”

Perhaps the arrogant members of Washington’s Establishment imagine that other nation’s leaders don’t pay attention to what is being said about them, or even if they do read or hear such stuff, that they ignore insults or treat them lightly. They don’t.  Nobody does.  And it’s about time the swaggering zealots of US officialdom realized that patronizing comments about foreign presidents, prime ministers and other prominent figures serve only to stoke up their dislike for America and actually unite their people against the mighty meddler from across the oceans.

A few days after President Trump’s smart cookie comment on May 1, US Senator Cory Gardner chimed in with the observation that “This is a crazed maniac at the helm of one of the world’s nuclear regimes — trying to become a nuclear regime. We shouldn’t be in a position of flattery, be in a position to try to honor him, by bringing him into a conversation with the United States until he meets those obligations and promises.”  (What promises?) Gardner is of no consequence as a legislator, but North Korea’s Central News Agency came back with some hefty invective, so you might think that more important people in Congress would then realize there’s no point in insulting Kim and company, because it does not encourage them to behave rationally. But no.  For Senator John McCain joined in and called Kim a “crazy fat kid.”

The sneering comment about North Korea on August 6 by the US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, that “we basically gave them a kick in the gut with a billion dollars of sanctions” is another example of unthinking abuse. The Koreans shot back with condemnation and a vow not to come to the negotiating table with the United States until it ends its hostile policies. What did the stupid Haley expect? What reaction did she imagine would come from Pyongyang in riposte to her needlessly provocative and insulting assertion that the UN (meaning the US) had “put the North Korean dictator on notice”?

Then Secretary Tillerson, the Washington intellectual of diplomacy, announced that the United States would indeed sit down for talks “when conditions are right” to discuss “denuclearization and steps to ensure North Korea can feel secure and prosperous.”  He declared that “The best signal that North Korea could give us that they’re prepared to talk would be to stop these missile launches. We’ve not had any extended period of time where they have not taken some type of provocative action by launching ballistic missiles. I think that would be the first and strongest signal they could send to us, would be to stop these missile launches.”

He was publicly ordering the psychotic Supreme Leader of North Korea to stop testing his ballistic missiles.  But, predictably to all but the ingenuous holier-than-thou saber-rattling dwellers in far-off Washington clouds, North Korea promptly vowed to inflict a “thousands-fold” revenge on the US.  Perhaps Washington expected Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un to immediately tweet something like “Just got message from great Tillerson. Have decided to stop all missile tests. Good!”

In a perplexing change-about, there was a sort of “olive branch” held out by Tillerson,  contradicting the egregious Ambassador Nikki Haley’s declaration that “the time for talk is over,” and it isn’t surprising nobody can work out in what direction the US is heading.  It can hardly be expected that the North Koreans might be able to understand what’s happening, and the danger is that the “crazy fat kid” might prove he is going off the planet. And the really worrying thing is that he could take many millions of people with him.

Contradictory messages have been sprayed around with the insults, and this is no way to provide international leadership. It is time that Washington spoke with one concerted voice to state exactly what it intends to do about a matter of international importance that, thanks to the erratic ricocheting of so many noisy people, is rapidly becoming a major threat to the very existence of so many lives.

Trump should cease his erratic tweeting from his golfing holiday and get back to the White House and do his job. And he must remember that insults and apocalyptic threats won’t solve his problems.

More articles by:

Brian Cloughley writes about foreign policy and military affairs. He lives in Voutenay sur Cure, France.

CounterPunch Magazine


bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
August 18, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Why Trump Could Be Gone Before 2020
John Steppling
America Asleep
Jeffrey St. Clair
To See or to Nazi: Trump’s Moral Blindspot is America’s
Vincent Emanuele
The Fetishization of Violence: Reflections on Charlottesville, WWII and Activism
Peter A. Coclanis
Why Trump Isn’t a Populist
Rob Urie
Imperial Death Spiral
Sam Husseini
How “Both Sides” Forge U.S. Supremacy: the Nationalistic Hypocrisies of “Violence” and “Free Speech”
David Rosen
Permanent War, Permanent Failure
Patrick Cockburn
Endtimes in Mosul
Dave Lindorff
Discovering Racism and Then Discovering It Anew
Richard Hardigan
Israel Continues Its Attack on Palestinian Freedom of Expression
Alexander Cockburn
Two Sides to Every Issue: the Tedium Twins Debate the Crucifixion, Slavery and Cannibalism
Pete Dolack
Life Under Capitalism: Early Deaths a ‘Silver Lining’ for Corporations
John Laforge
Peace Camp and War Games at Harvest Time
Robert Fantina
Trump, Congress and Integrity
Alfredo Lopez
Justice Department’s Dreamhost Subpoena Ramps Up the Police State
CJ Hopkins
A De-Putin-Nazification of America Update
Steve Brown
Giving Trump Credit When He’s Right
Peter Certo
White Supremacy Carries More Than a Tiki Torch
David Swanson
Creative Anti-Nazism
Jill Richardson
It’s Not About ‘White Culture’
Joseph Natoli
Easy Access to the Abyss
Mark Weisbrot
Strangling Puerto Rico in Order to Save It
Robert Koehler
Why Does North Korea Hate Us?
Nyla Ali Khan
The Woman Question in the Subcontinent
Alvaro Huerta
A Chicana/o Manifesto on Community Organizing: Reflections of a Scholar-Activist
Binoy Kampmark
Bullying Venezuela: Trump’s Unvarnished Threat
Patrick Bond
Falling BRICS Endanger Their Citizens’ Health, Starting With South Africa’s Jacob Zuma
Jamarl L. Thomas
Free Speech is Free Speech, Precisely for the Speech You Don’t Like
Kary Love
The Fourth Branch
Graham Peebles
Climate Change Demands an End to Excess and Greed
Louisa Willcox
Ted and Joan Major: Last of a Generation of Conservation Giants in Jackson Hole
Dylan Moore
Trump’s Immigration Plan Will Harm Americans and the Economy
Olivia Alperstein
Racists Look Emboldened. They’re Actually Terrified.
José-Antonio Orosco
What Did Dr. King Mean by Love?
Rob Okun
The Poison of White Supremacist Masculinity
Thomas Knapp
Charlottesville Haters: Test Case for the Internet as Public Square
Cesar Chelala
What Trump Can Learn From Ants
Ryan Summers
Breitbart, the Alt-Right and Charlottesville
Louis Proyect
Digital Dystopias
Charles R. Larson
Review: Lawrence P. Jackson’s “Chester B. Himes”
David Yearsley
“Oklahoma!”: As American as Apple Pie and Broken Treaties
August 17, 2017
Ajamu Baraka
The Story of Charlottesville Was Written in Blood in the Ukraine
Tim Messer Messer-Kruse
Right But Wrong: Trump’s Defense of Confederate Symbols and Its Threat to Color-Blind Liberalism
George Barbarie
Barbarian Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail