FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Atheism and Wonder

Nicht wie die Welt ist, ist das Mystische, sondern daß sie ist.

(The mystical is not how the world is, but that it is)

— Ludwig Wittgenstein

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

— Christopher Hitchens

Feuerbach, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and in our time Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett have all espoused a militant form of atheism.

Are they right? Is there no place for God and religion in the modern world? Is religion just a pernicious remnant of a pre-scientific era which only serves to exacerbate and indeed create sectarianism, bigotry, ignorance, intolerance, and bloodshed?

To begin with we should make a distinction between organized religion and what Freud called das ozeanische Gefühl (the oceanic feeling)It is worth quoting Freud’s thoughts on this concept in full:

Ein Gefühl, das er die Empfindung der »Ewigkeit« nennen möchte, ein Gefühl wie von etwas Unbegrenztem, Schrankenlosem, gleichsam »Ozeanischem«. Dies Gefühl sei eine rein subjektive Tatsache, kein Glaubenssatz; keine Zusicherung persönlicher Fortdauer knüpfe sich daran, aber es sei die Quelle der religiösen Energie, die von den verschiedenen Kirchen und Religionssystemen gefaßt, in bestimmte Kanäle geleitet und gewiß auch aufgezehrt werde. Nur auf Grund dieses ozeanischen Gefühls dürfe man sich religiös heißen, auch wenn man jeden Glauben und jede Illusion ablehne.( A feeling that he would like to call the feeling of “eternity,” a feeling of something unlimited, boundless, “oceanic,” as it were. This feeling is a purely subjective fact, not a belief. There is no assurance of personal continuity, but it is the source of the religious energy that is seized upon by the various churches and religious systems, distributed into certain channels, and thereby consumed. It is only because of this oceanic feeling that one should call oneself religious, even if one rejects every belief and every illusion.)

Although Freud freely admits that he himself had never had this oceanic feeling/religious impulse he is well aware that millions of people, if not billions have.

Is science in a secure position to cavalierly dismiss this subjective fact/feeling?

Yes, there can be no historical doubt that this feeling has been exploited for all sorts of nefarious purposes leading to torture, bloodshed, and war. The history of organized religion is filled with horrors. Yet, one could also argue, as Freud did in Moses and Monotheism (interestingly enough his last book) that religion has had a positive effect on the development of man as well. In the Jewish case; it was the birth of high-level abstraction as represented or thought of in the object of the unseen God. Indeed, Freud views this event as an historical big bang (even if Freud maintains that its origins are Egyptian rather than Jewish). The advent of thinking in terms of an abstract God opened up man’s mind to abstraction in general and introspection in particular. In a sense, the microcosm (man) was able for the first time to enclose the macrocosm (God) within the confines of his own personal conscience and experience.

If Freud is correct in his interpretation, this was no small step for humanity.

Religion, in particular, the Christian religion whether intentionally or not has also served as the spiritual origin of significant secular movements such as modern day mass democracy, human rights, socialism, and even, arguably, Marxism.

Thus the oceanic feeling has a dual pedigree of producing both light and dark along the historical path of humankind; as have most ideas and inventions.

In light of these historical and subjective facts, it would appear to be the height of folly and intellectual presumptuousness to dismiss and worse yet to attempt to uproot this evidently essential and productive oceanic feeling in the human breast.

Rather than advocate its total destruction one should perhaps adopt an evolutionary position of care, guidance, and a balanced humanism and enlightenment.

Indeed, from a strictly scientific point of view the following propositions of whether or not there is a God, an afterlife, a soul cannot be definitively proven or disproved. They remain open questions till this day. Therefore, the appropriate position for a scientist regarding these questions is that there is not enough conclusive evidence either way to definitively close these questions. And, frankly, there probably never will be.

Thus, the honest philosopher, scientist, skeptic can only assert a strongly agnostic opinion about matters of faith and spiritual feeling.

Yet, this of course does not bar him or her from pointing out the sociological, educational, cultural, scientific anomie that often arise from these beliefs. This is perfectly acceptable. For example, a faith that demonizes, limits, or effaces women, homosexuals, blacks, non-believers or any other group should be vigorously combated on the grounds of a universal humanism. A humanism which, in itself, initially developed out of the Christian faith even as it has now transcended it.

As Wittgenstein pointed out (see above); the very fact of the existence of our world is a cause for wonder for human beings. It gives rise to questions; to a myriad of questions some of which may be answered in time; many of which may never be answered.

Indeed, this sense of human wonder at the facticity of existence; of the world; of ourselves; of others may be the very source of our being; of our Dasein (Being-in-the-World).

Perhaps the universe does not wonder that it is. But in us; that wonder is alive. It should never be extirpated if we are to continue to be a vital, creative, indeed, loving species.

Human love itself is, at its purest, an ineffable leap into the unknown; a faith in ones own powers of giving and the other’s reciprocal potential leading to new paths never quite seen before.

In this sense, the oceanic feeling is man’s expression of universal love for not only his own kind but the very fact of existence. A fact which as Wittgenstein has told us, is in its very essence: mystical.

More articles by:

Dan Corjescu teaches Political Philosophy at Zeppelin University in Friedrichshafen, Germany.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

April 25, 2019
Marc Levy
All My Vexes Are in Texas
Jim Kavanagh
Avoiding Assange
Michael D. Yates
The Road Beckons
Julian Vigo
Notre Dame Shows the Unifying Force of Culture, Grenfell Reveals the Corruption of Government
Ted Rall
Democratic Refusal to Impeach Could Be Disastrous
Tracey Harris
Lessons Learned From the Tiny House Movement
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Human Flourishing (Eudaimonia): an Antidote to Extinction?
Dana Johnson
Buyer Beware: Hovercraft Ruling Deals a Major Blow to Land Conservation in Alaska
Norman Solomon
Joe Biden: Puffery vs. Reality
Jen Marlowe
The Palestine Marathon
Binoy Kampmark
Lethal Bungling: Sri Lanka’s Easter Bombings
Michael Slager
“Where’s Your Plan?” Legalized Bribery and Climate Change
Jesse Jackson
Trump Plunges the US Deeper Into Forgotten Wars
George Wuerthner
BLM Grazing Decision Will Damage the Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness
April 24, 2019
Susan Babbitt
Disdain and Dignity: An Old (Anti-Imperialist) Story
Adam Jonas Horowitz
Letter to the Emperor
Lawrence Davidson
A Decisive Struggle For Our Future
John Steppling
The Mandate for Israel: Keep the Arabs Down
Victor Grossman
Many Feet
Cira Pascual Marquina
The Commune is the Supreme Expression of Participatory Democracy: a Conversation with Anacaona Marin of El Panal Commune
Binoy Kampmark
Failed States and Militias: General Khalifa Haftar Moves on Tripoli
Dean Baker
Payments to Hospitals Aren’t Going to Hospital Buildings
Alvaro Huerta
Top Ten List in Defense of MEChA
Colin Todhunter
As the 2019 Indian General Election Takes Place, Are the Nation’s Farmers Being Dealt a Knock-Out Blow?
Charlie Gers
Trump’s Transgender Troops Ban is un-American and Inhumane
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Just Another Spring in Progress?
Thomas Knapp
On Obstruction, the Mueller Report is Clintonesque
Elliot Sperber
Every Truck’s a Garbage Truck
April 23, 2019
Peter Bolton
The Monroe Doctrine is Back, and as the Latest US Attack on Cuba Shows, Its Purpose is to Serve the Neoliberal Order
David Schultz
The Mueller Report: Trump Too Inept to Obstruct Justice
Geoff Beckman
Crazy Uncle Joe and the Can’t We All Just Get Along Democrats
Medea Benjamin
Activists Protect DC Venezuelan Embassy from US-supported Coup
Patrick Cockburn
What Revolutionaries in the Middle East Have Learned Since the Arab Spring
Jim Goodman
Don’t Fall for the Hype of Free Trade Agreements
Lance Olsen
Climate and Forests: Land Managers Must Adapt, and Conservationists, Too
William Minter
The Coming Ebola Epidemic
Tony McKenna
Stephen King’s IT: a 2019 Retrospective
David Swanson
Pentagon Claims 1,100 High Schools Bar Recruiters; Peace Activists Offer $1,000 Award If Any Such School Can Be Found
Gary Olson
A Few Comments on the recent PBS Series: Reconstruction: America After the Civil War
April 22, 2019
Melvin Goodman
The NYTs Tries to Rehabilitate Bloody Gina Haspel
Robert Fisk
After ISIS, a Divided Iraq, Wounded and Grief-Stricken
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange as Neuroses
John Laforge
Chernobyl’s Deadly Effects Estimates Vary
Kenneth Surin
Mueller Time? Not for Now
Cesar Chelala
Yemen: The Triumph of Barbarism
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail