FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The EU Plays the China Card

Who could have imagined back in 2002, when the euro first began circulating, that ten years later, in an act of near desperation, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, would travel to Beijing, hat in hand, to seek bailout funds from Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao to keep the euro afloat?  But that is exactly what happened on February 2nd.  In addition, to placate her American handlers, she also delivered a plea to the Chinese to support tough UN Security Council sponsored sanctions against Iran, truly an exercise in futility.

The common currency of the 17-nation eurozone is being kept afloat by a series of lies, leaks, rumors, and smoke-and-mirrors, behind the scenes financial schemes.  Equity markets are pumped up by the expectations of the next meeting of the ECB, the European finance ministers, or German Chancellor Angela Merkel with French President Nicholas Sarkozy.  Each such meeting holds out the hope of a silver bullet fix for the euro.  Most have fixed nothing.

China has $3.2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves of which over $1.0 trillion is invested in U.S. Treasury bonds.  Merkel would like to persuade Wen Jiabao to use some of China’s excess foreign exchange reserves to bail out financially beleaguered EU countries such as Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and possibly others.  All of this makes Washington very nervous. Although the White House wants to see the euro stay afloat, it is neither politically nor financially in a position to do much about it.  On the other hand, it does not relish the thought of the EU becoming financially dependent on Beijing or China reducing its commitment to holding U.S. government debt.

To make the Chinese bailout of the EU more palatable to the United States Merkel was no doubt pressured into playing the Iranian card calling for tough sanctions against Iran, if it does not abandon its alleged plans to develop nuclear weapons.  However, it’s hard to imagine that either China or Germany would be very enthusiastic about such sanctions since both China and many EU countries import oil from Iran.  Furthermore, China and Germany are known to be suppliers of technology to Iran.  On the geopolitical front China may actually welcome a nuclear armed Iran as a countervailing force to American-Israeli hegemony in the Middle East.

It’s not by chance alone that China and Russia vetoed a UN Security Council Resolution condemning the Syrian government’s bloody response to the regime’s opposition movement.  They see Western intervention in Syria as one step removed from an American led effort to bring down the government of Iran.  Both acts would be viewed as serious threats to Chinese and Russian national security.  China knows that the NATO led overthrow of Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi was aimed squarely at curbing Chinese influence in Africa, since China was visibly involved in Libyan oil production before the attacks.

The EU may soon find itself in such desperate need of Chinese financial support that China might demand that both Israel and the U.S. discontinue their threats against Iran as a condition for granting the EU financial support.  China could effectively checkmate both Israel and the United States.  On the other hand, if either Israel or the United States or both attack Iran’s nuclear sites, China and Russia might retaliate by taking out Israel, closing the Strait of Hormuz, or attacking the oil production facilities in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or Iraq.

Notwithstanding the fact that Merkel’s visit to China barely made it on the national radar screen, the consequences of her visit could have broad based, far reaching implications.  Any decision taken by Beijing will affect all 28 EU countries, China, Russia, Iran, Israel, the Arab nations, the U.S., and probably most of the rest of the world.  The fate of the euro and the fate of Iran are enmeshed in a very complex nonzero-sum, multicountry chess game of our own making.  Sometimes in the process of our perverted attempts to unify and secure ourselves through coercion, collectivism, and the military, “we end up destroying community, scattering ourselves, fracturing into a thousand different voices, falling to earth in disaster.  Meltdown.”  So said William H. Willimon, former Dean of the Duke University Chapel, in Downsizing the USA (1997).

Sometimes, when we make our bed, we actually have to lie in it.  This may be one of those times.

Thomas H. Naylor is Founder of the Second Vermont Republic and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University; co-author of AffluenzaDownsizing the U.S.A., and The Search for Meaning.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Justin Anderson
Don’t Count the Left Out Just Yet
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail