The Philly Media and Mumia Abu-Jamal

Let’s try to figure this one outshall we

Four of America’s largest news organizations recently carried reports about a major new development in the biggest murder case in Philadelphia’s history yet Philly’s two largest newspapers treated this hometown news as snooze unworthy of coverage.

These reports covered the federal Third Circuit appeals court issuing an order in the Mumia Abu-Jamal case that the Associated Press (AP) news wire service described as “the most significant ruling in the case in four years”

The Third Circuit order stated it would consider three of Abu- Jamal’s claims appealing his conviction for murdering a Philadelphia policeman in 1981.

The import of the Third Circuit order–a/k/a ‘news’ about this development–is two-fold:

(1) significantly, the Third Circuit agreed to hear two more appeal claims than a federal District Court judge certified for appeal in his 2001 ruling; and

(2) the Third Circuit apparently is not back-handing Abu-Jamal’s appeal like Pa state courts routinely do.

Under standard journalism text book definitions of news the Third Circuit order constitutes news–not front-page headline news yet news arguably meriting more than brief coverage since Abu-Jamal’s case constantly receives international attention…inclusive of foreign governmental leaders.

The AP, along with ABC, CBS and CNN carried articles on the Third Circuit order.

This contrasted starkly to the Philadelphia Daily News which only carried a ‘news brief’ and the Philadelphia Inquirer which initially ignored the order.

The ‘Inky’ did run a ‘news brief’ days after release of the order on the same day that the New York Times carried a news brief item on this major case from the center of the Inquirer’s coverage area.

Both the scene of the 1981 murder producing Abu-Jamal’s conviction and where he grew up are just blocks from the Inky’s main office.

Now, let’s be clear: determinations on the news ‘value’ of events are subjective decisions made daily by experienced editors and reporters in the news business.

There is legitimate debate among news professionals on where a valid news item should be placed in a newspaper and what headline that item should carry.

However, it should be a no-brainer for news professionals that a “significant” development in clearly the most widely examined murder case in Philly’s history constitutes valid news that should not be downplayed or dismissed.

The fact that the Daily News and Inquirer downplayed news of this federal appeals court order–while seemingly startling–is sadly consistent with the dismissive coverage procedures practiced by Philly’s mainstream news media in the Abu-Jamal casepractices too often replicated by non-Philly news media.

Noted media critic and University of Pennsylvania Professor Edward Herman termed these coverage practices ‘Hometown Hostility’ in an analysis of Inquirer coverage of the Abu-Jamal case published in 2000.

“Biased coverage” by the Inquirer on the Abu-Jamal case is “typical” Herman noted in his analysis.

“Although, the Inquirer has been exceedingly reluctant to feature or even report on rallies, tribunals or reports supporting Abu-Jamal, it has found negative news about his supporters highly newsworthy,” Herman wrote.

Philadelphia area investigative reporter David Lindorff, author of the best&only non-partisan book examining the Abu-Jamal case, is also critical of Philadelphia news coverage of this case.

“For a long time, it has been obvious that with the Mumia Abu- Jamal story, the farther you got from Philadelphia, the more honest and fair the coverage. Conversely, the closer you get to Philadelphia, the more strained and skittish the coverage, if developments get covered at all,” Lindorff stated during a recent interview.

“The latest news development in the case, which is really quite dramatic and important for several reasons, provides a case study in local media gutlessness,” Lindorff noted.

So, what is news?

Well, Philly print and broadcast mainstream news media could have ‘discovered’ news in the fact that Abu-Jamal’s main support group–based in Philadelphia–immediately posted Lindorff’s article on the court order on its web site.

How is that news?

Well, many of Abu-Jamal’s staunchest supporters–including the Philly based group–have trashed Lindorff’s meticulously researched book, damning it as too objective in part for its failings to exude the hero-worship posture they desire.

The web based Counterpunch and Salon.com posted Lindorff’s articles on the order.

On a more substantial matter, Philly’s news media could have found news in the fact that twice this year, the Third Circuit granted relief in Philadelphia murder cases on the issue of prosecution discrimination in jury selection–one of the appeal points in last week’s Abu-Jamal order.

One of these two rulings occurred in mid-October.

These rulings, and others on this legal point since the mid- 1980s, expose a pattern of jury discrimination practices by Philadelphia prosecutors that bracket Abu-Jamal’s heavily criticized 1982 trial. An Amnesty International report on Abu- Jamal’s case described that ’82 trial as “deeply flawed” failing to meet “international standards for a fair trial.”

Evidence cited by Philadelphia based federal judges when voiding jury discrimination tainted murder convictions includes notes prosecutors kept on the race of potential jury members and a videotaped training session where a veteran prosecutor instructed rookie prosecutors on how to craftily rid juries of non- whites and whites living in racially integrated, liberal communities of Philadelphia.

In 1991, the Inquirer ran articles on Charles Diggs and Harold McKendrick, after local federal judges voided their respective murder convictions due to jury selection bias by Philly prosecutors.

These articles ran during a period when local media ignored discriminatory US Supreme Court actions refusing to grant Abu- Jamal relief on the same constitutional protection that Court was giving two convicted murderers: a white racist prison gang member and a white devil worshiper.

Email exchanges immediately after issuance of the Third Circuit’s order provide a window into the news decision making at the Inquirer and Daily News.

An Inquirer staffer deemed the court order “a procedural development that is notenough to warrant a story.”

A Daily News staffer stated “the evaluation of our reporters, editors and lawyer [is] that this is NOT a big deal”

Well, there you have it–go figure?

Linn Washington Jr. a journalism professor at Temple University, has covered the Abu-Jamal case since December 1981.


More articles by:

Linn Washington, Jr. is a founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, (AK Press). He lives in Philadelphia.

March 21, 2019
Daniel Warner
And Now Algeria
Eric Draitser
On Ilhan Omar, Assad Fetishism, and the Danger of Red-Brown “Anti-Imperialism”
Elizabeth Keyes
Broadway’s “Hamilton” and the Willing Suspension of Reality-Based Moral Consciousness
David Underhill
Optional Fatherhood Liberates Christians From Abortion Jihad
Dean Baker
The Wall Street Bailouts, Bernie and the Washington Post
Russell Mokhiber
The Boeing Blackout
William Astore
America’s Senior Generals Find No Exits From Endless War
Jeff Hauser – Eleanor Eagan
Boeing Debacle Shows Need to Investigate Trump-era Corruption
Ramzy Baroud
Uniting Fatah, Not Palestinians: The Dubious Role of Mohammed Shtayyeh
Nick Pemberton
Is Kamala Harris The Centrist We Need?
Nick Licata
All Southern States are Not the Same: Mississippi’s Challenge
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Sly Encouragement of Lawless Violence
Cesar Chelala
Public Health Challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean
March 20, 2019
T.J. Coles
Countdown to “Full Spectrum Dominance”
W. T. Whitney
Re-Targeting Cuba: Why Title III of U.S. Helms-Burton Act will be a Horror Show
Kenneth Surin
Ukania’s Great Privatization Heist
Howard Lisnoff
“Say It Ain’t So, Joe:” the Latest Neoliberal from the War and Wall Street Party
Walter Clemens
Jailed Birds of a Feather May Sing Together
George Ochenski
Failing Students on Climate Change
Cesar Chelala
The Sweet Smell of Madeleine
Binoy Kampmark
Global Kids Strike
Nicky Reid
Where Have All the Flowers Gone?: Requiem for a Fictional Party
Elliot Sperber
Empedocles and You and Me 
March 19, 2019
Paul Street
Socialism Curiously Trumps Fascism in U.S. Political Threat Reporting
Jonah Raskin
Guy Standing on Anxiety, Anger and Alienation: an Interview About “The Precariat”
Patrick Cockburn
The Brutal Legacy of Bloody Sunday is a Powerful Warning to Those Hoping to Save Brexit
Robert Fisk
Turning Algeria Into a Necrocracy
John Steppling
Day of Wrath
Robin Philpot
Truth, Freedom and Peace Will Prevail in Rwanda
Victor Grossman
Women Marchers and Absentees
Binoy Kampmark
The Dangers of Values: Brenton Tarrant, Fraser Anning and the Christchurch Shootings
Jeff Sher
Let Big Pharma Build the Wall
Jimmy Centeno
Venezuela Beneath the Skin of Imperialism
Jeffrey Sommers – Christopher Fons
Scott Walker’s Failure, Progressive Wisconsin’s Win: Milwaukee’s 2020 Democratic Party Convention
Steve Early
Time for Change at NewsGuild?
March 18, 2019
Scott Poynting
Terrorism Has No Religion
Ipek S. Burnett
Black Lives on Trial
John Feffer
The World’s Most Dangerous Divide
Paul Cochrane
On the Ground in Venezuela vs. the Media Spectacle
Dean Baker
The Fed and the 3.8 Percent Unemployment Rate
Thomas Knapp
Social Media Companies “Struggle” to Help Censors Keep us in the Dark
Binoy Kampmark
Death in New Zealand: The Christchurch Shootings
Mark Weisbrot
The Reality Behind Trump’s Venezuela Regime Change Coalition
Weekend Edition
March 15, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
Is Ilhan Omar Wrong…About Anything?
Kenn Orphan
Grieving in the Anthropocene