FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

A Fine Republic, But Can We Keep It?  

As Benjamin Franklyn was leaving Independence Hall on the final day of the Constitutional Convention, the story goes, a woman asked him, ‘Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?”  He is said to have replied without hesitation, “A republic, if you can keep it.”*

A Skeptical Founder 

Scholars tend to focus on the word “republic” in Franklyn’s answer and often note that Franklyn did not call the new government a democracy. The delegates to the Constitutional Convention limited the role of the people, not least by vesting the power to make and execute the laws in elected representatives.  And even then, only propertied white males were allowed to vote.

Even so, Franklyn expressed doubts about the survivability of the system.  Why?  The answer, I believe, lies in the inherently fragile nature of any system of government based on popular consent.

An Impeached President 

It has only happened four times in twenty-three decades and 2020 will be the first time an impeached president has run for re-election.  Last October, 16 prominent conservative lawyers asserted, “the acts revealed publicly over the past several weeks are fundamentally incompatible with the president’s oath of office.” In December, the House of Representatives voted two articles of impeachment.

The President grows ever more defiant and belligerent.  According to an NPR report,

He has accused Schiff of committing “treason” and trying to take him out by “coup.” Whoever gave information to the whistleblower is “a spy.” While Trump has long called the media “fake news,” he has resurrected the phrase “the corrupt media” to describe reporters covering him now.

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell vows to block impeachment and publicly promises “total coordination” with the White House.

An Embattled Opposition 

While the shape-shifting GOP has become a tool of an unprincipled president, far-right populists, and the superrich, a deeply divided Democratic Party continues to be a paradigm of disarray.  Comedian Will Rogers joked, “I am not a member of any organized political party.  I am a Democrat.”   Now, it’s no joke.

There appears to be no consensus on the kind of core values, policies, and principles capable of unifying and motivating the party’s traditional support base.  Given the severe leadership deficit, it is perhaps not surprising that the opposing party—the only real obstacle to Donald Trump’s reelection—has advanced no clear prescription for defeating him.

A Fractured Congress 

In the spring of 2019 the headline screamed,  “Trump and congressional Democrats are taking Washington gridlock to a whole new level.”  It was not a liberal rag doing the screaming; it was the Business Insider.   The White House was “stonewalling subpoenas” and various committees were “ramping up investigations”.  Other media outlets were making the same sort of dire predictions, of course.  Indeed, a gridlocked Congress is hardly even news anymore.  It’s politics as usual in Washington.

The purpose of Congress is to make the laws and keep the executive branch honest.  By definition, a gridlocked Congress cannot pass laws.  When that happens, there’s a powerful incentive for the president to act unilaterally, using executive powers to circumvent the Congress.  That happened during Barack Obama’s presidency when McConnell vowed to block everything the White House tried to do.  It’s happening again, only this time the Senate is doubling down on behalf of a president obsessed with avoiding accountability as evidenced by his refusal to disclose his tax returns, defiance toward Congress, and disdain for the Constitution.

A Battered Constitution 

In October 2019, when the talking heads on Fox News criticized his intention to use one of his resorts for a G-7 summit, President Trump dismissed what he called the “phony emoluments clause”.  Who cares what the Constitution says about the matter?

Well, here’s what it actually says (Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 8): “…no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign state.”  No exceptions.

Which raises the question:  What other parts of the Constitution does President Trump consider “phony”?

Apparently all of Article II defining the role of the executive branch, the powers of the chief executive, and the limits of presidential powers.  No matter.  In July 2019, President Trump offered his own interpretation of  Article II:  “I have the right to do whatever I want.”

But that’s not what Article II says.  The language—“…he shall take care that laws are faithfully executed”—is clear.  No wiggle room there.

An Imperiled Republic 

All of which brings us full circle, back to Ben Franklyn’s admonition. Can we keep this republic if Donald Trump is elected to a second term?

 

More articles by:
bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
January 28, 2020
Patrick Cockburn
China’s Coronavirus Outbreak Reminds Me of the Irish Polio Epidemic I Survived
P. Sainath
Making Rebellion Attractive: Why the Establishment Still Hates John Reed
Geoff Dutton
Where Was Rudy Giuliani When Democrats Needed Him?
Sam Pizzigati
The Evolution of “Davos Man” into . . . Trump Fan!
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Truth a Major Casualty of Impeachment Hearings
Michael Welton
Autobiographical Roots of Habermas’ Thought
Greta Anderson
Remove the Livestock, Not the Wolves
Nick Pemberton
Sorry Chomsky and Friends, The Green Party isn’t the Problem
Jack Rasmus
Trump’s Feeble Phase 1 China-US Trade Deal
Mike Garrity – Jason Christensen
Natural Gas Pipeline Corridor Threatens Imperiled Species and Inventoried Roadless Areas
Daniel Falcone
Make America Radical Again: A Conversation with Harvey J. Kaye
Binoy Kampmark
Split Hearings: the Assange Extradition Case Drags On
Eric Toussaint
Greece: a Chronology From January 25, 2015 to 2019
Nino Pagliccia
An Open Letter to Justin Trudeau on Venezuela
Robert Hunziker
Reflections of a Scientific Humanist
Jeffrey St. Clair
Who Cares If It Leaks? An Afternoon at Hollyhock House
January 27, 2020
Peter Harrison
Adani and the Purpose of Education
Dean Baker
Can Manufacturing Workers Take Many More of Trump’s Trade “Victories”?
Robert Fisk
Trump in Davos: US isolationism is Reaching Its Final Narcissistic Chapter
Ariel Dorfman
The Challenge for Chile and the World
Victor Grossman
The Misuses of Antisemitism in the UK and the USA
Thomas Knapp
Bernie Sanders, Joe Rogan, Human Rights Campaign, and Truth in Advertising
Fred Gardner
NewsGuard Can Save You From Putin!
Lawrence Wittner
A Historian Reflects on the Return of Fascism
Rose Miriam Elizalde
Cuba: a Matter of Principle
Bob Topper
The Better Moral Creed
George Wuerthner
Giving Cover to the Abuses of Big Ag
Christopher Packham
This is Really Happening
Negin Owliaei
Americans Need to Hear More From Iranians, Here’s Where to Start
Ted Rall
Corporate Crap That Doesn’t Kill Bernie
Elliot Sperber
Sunset’s Soon
Weekend Edition
January 24, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
A Letter From Iowa
Jim Kavanagh
Aftermath: The Iran War After the Soleimani Assassination
Jeffrey St. Clair
The Camp by the Lake
Chuck Churchill
The Long History of Elite Rule: What Will It Take To End It?
Robert Hunziker
A Climate Time Bomb With Trump’s Name Inscribed
Andrew Levine
Trump: The King
Jess Franklin
Globalizing the War on Indigenous People: Bolsonaro and Modi
James Graham
From Paris, With Tear Gas…
Rob Urie
Why the Primaries Matter
Dan Bacher
Will the Extinction of Delta Smelt Be Governor Gavin Newsom’s Environmental Legacy?
Ramzy Baroud
In the Name of “Israel’s Security”: Retreating US Gives Israel Billions More in Military Funding
Vijay Prashad
What the Right Wing in Latin America Means by Democracy Is Violence
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Biden’s Shameful Foreign Policy Record Extends Well Beyond Iraq
Louis Proyect
Isabel dos Santos and Africa’s Lumpen-Bourgeoisie
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail