FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Iran, the U.S. and EIKO

Photo source futureatlas.com | CC BY 2.0

Now that U.S. President Donald Trump has violated the internationally-recognized JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), to the dismay of most of the world, and even most of the U.S.’s military experts, Iran can once again expect sanctions. This, of course, puts the U.S.’s European allies in an awkward position, since those that are signatories of the agreement plan to remain in it, since Iran is in complete compliance with the terms of the agreement.

One Iranian organization that is sure to feel the displaced wrath of the unstable U.S. president is the ‘Execution of Imam Khomeini’s Order’ (EIKO). This organization is controlled by the Ayatollah Khamenei, and that is sufficient for the U.S. to want to damage it.

But what is the EIKO? Is it a terrorist organization, like the U.S.’s Central American Agency (CIA), or Israel’s Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)? Let’s look at the purpose, as proclaimed by the Ayatollah:  “I’m concerned about solving problems of the deprived classes of the society. For instance, solve problems of 1000 villages completely. How good would be if 1000 points of the country are solved or 1000 schools are built in the country; prepare this organization for this purpose.”

The U.S. government, of course, is completely unconcerned about ‘solving problems of the deprived classes’ within the U.S., since at least 45 million U.S. citizens live below the government-established poverty line, which is a joke in and of itself; for a family of four, a total household income of below $25,100 is considered living in poverty. Food, housing, utilities, clothing, medical and other expenses for a family of four cannot be met on that income. But while the government continues to cut spending on social programs, hurting the already poor and forcing more people into poverty, it spends billions of dollars on weapons to kill people around the world. It is unlikely that 1,000 new schools will be built any time soon, especially since U.S. Education Secretary Besty DeVos recently announced that she has visited no underperforming schools during her tenure. Why solve a problem that you choose not to see?

But what is any of that?  The fact that EIKO seeks to help struggling people in Iran is of no importance to the U.S. government; all that matters is that it is under the control of the Ayatollah Khamenei.

A subsidiary of EIKO, the Barakat Foundation, lists this prominently on its website: “A blessed effort to uproot deprivation and to realize social and economic empowerment”. Again, a very controversial statement in the eyes of the U.S. government.

Such disdain for helping people in need is typical of the U.S. government, which, in 2017, stopped funding UNESCO, the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization. On its website, in answer to the question, ‘What is UNESCO’, we read this:  UNESCO “…seeks to build peace through international cooperation in Education, the Sciences and Culture.” And yet last year, the U.S., which provided 22% of funding to the organization, cut it all off. The U.S., obviously, has little or no interest in building peace.

With the U.S.’s shocking violation of the JCPOA, sanctions that impact the Iranian people are likely to be imposed once again, and the U.S. may target EIKO, which seeks to help the very people the sanctions will hit the hardest.

This writer reviewed some right-wing websites full of criticism of EIKO. These are some of the charges made against it:

One foundation within the EIKO umbrella is the Mostazafan Foundation. “A few months ago it published annual financial statements that declared its assets to be around $16 billion—likely a deliberate understatement.” The article offered no evidence that this amount was understated.

Let us remember that Trump claims to be a billionaire, but has never disclosed his finances, or his tax returns. So while his wealth is said to be overstated, his hiding of his financial records certainly seems to indicate that that is true, and provides more proof than the unfounded accusation against the Mostazafan Foundation.

“…it remains in the national security interest of the U.S. to prevent the worst of the worst actors (EIKO) in Iran from getting their hands on additional capital with which to finance their foreign aggression and domestic repression.” This phrase followed a list of the fields in which EIKO has investments, such as finance, oil and telecommunications. Nothing objectionable here. But let’s pay close attention to the idea of EIKO financing ‘foreign aggression and domestic repression’.

Iran has not invaded another nation since 1798. It has needed to defend itself and its people since that time, and has assisted allies in their struggles, as it is doing in Syria now. The terrorists in Syria that Iran is helping to fight are heavily financed by the U.S. Additionally, the U.S. is currently bombing seven countries. Are these not examples of ‘foreign aggression’?

And what about ‘domestic repression’ in the U.S.? Unarmed men, women and children of color are routinely gunned down by the racist U.S. police force with almost complete impunity. The U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. These seem to be examples of ‘domestic repression’ to this writer.

Another article references U.S. “…legislation honoring a Russian whistleblower….” That’s all well and good, but U.S. whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning are sentenced to long prison terms in solitary confinement. She was only released after being pardoned by President Barack Obama shortly before he left office. Edward Snowden, who also revealed U.S. government crimes, fled the country and remains in Russia on temporary asylum. Praising a Russian whistleblower while condemning those who expose U.S. crimes is the height of hypocrisy.

It remains to be seen if Trump will target EIKO; the effects of his decision to violate the JCPOA  are still reverberating around the world, and with his unsound decision-making process, whatever on earth that even is, it’s anyone’s guess what he’ll do next. It’s possible that EIKO will be targeted. But with England, France, Germany, the European Union, Russia and China, the other signatories to the JCPOA, vowing to continue to abide by it, as they should, the U.S. may be put in the uncomfortable position of needing to sanction some of its oldest and most trusted allies.

This is the new world order as envisioned by Trump. This is increasing global isolation of the U.S., the continuing downward spiral of the U.S.’s reputation, and a frightening march toward war.

One would hope that more sensible minds in Washington, D.C. would halt this headlong rush to disaster, but there don’t seem to be any there. The greatest hope now for peace is the combination of Iran, Russia and China, working together to counter the U.S.- Israeli threat. And with that, it is hoped that EIKO will be able to continue its all-important work.

More articles by:

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Pill Press).

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
November 14, 2019
Laura Carlsen
Mexico’s LeBaron Massacre and the War That Will Not Cease
Joe Emersberger
Oppose the Military Coup in Bolivia. Spare Us Your “Critiques”
Ron Jacobs
Trump’s Drug Deal Goes to Congress: Impeachment, Day One
Paul Edwards
Peak Hubris
Tamara Pearson
US and Corporations Key Factors Behind Most Violent Year Yet in Mexico
Jonah Raskin
Love and Death in the Age of Revolution
Robert Hunziker
Climate Confusion, Angst, and Sleeplessness
W. T. Whitney
To Confront Climate Change Humanity Needs Socialism
John Feffer
Examining Trump World’s Fantastic Claims About Ukraine
Nicky Reid
“What About the Children?” Youth Rights Before Parental Police States
Binoy Kampmark
Incinerating Logic: Bush Fires and Climate Change
John Horning
The Joshua Tree is Us
Andrew Stewart
Noel Ignatiev and the Great Divide
Cesar Chelala
Soap Operas as Teaching Tools
Chelli Stanley
In O’odham Land
November 13, 2019
Vijay Prashad
After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia
Charles Pierson
How Not to End a Forever War
Kenneth Surin
“We’ll See You on the Barricades”: Bojo Johnson’s Poundshop Churchill Imitation
Nick Alexandrov
Murder Like It’s 1495: U.S.-Backed Counterinsurgency in the Philippines
George Ochenski
Montana’s Radioactive Waste Legacy
Brian Terrell
A Doubtful Proposition: a Reflection on the Trial of the Kings Bay Plowshares 7
Nick Pemberton
Assange, Zuckerberg and Free Speech
James Bovard
The “Officer Friendly” Police Fantasy
Dean Baker
The Logic of Medical Co-Payments
Jeff Mackler
Chicago Teachers Divided Over Strike Settlement
Binoy Kampmark
The ISC Report: Russian Connections in Albion?
Norman Solomon
Biden and Bloomberg Want Uncle Sam to Defer to Uncle Scrooge
Jesse Jackson
Risking Lives in Endless Wars is Morally Wrong and a Strategic Failure
Manuel García, Jr.
Criminalated Warmongers
November 12, 2019
Nino Pagliccia
Bolivia and Venezuela: Two Countries, But Same Hybrid War
Patrick Cockburn
How Iran-Backed Forces Are Taking Over Iraq
Jonathan Cook
Israel is Silencing the Last Voices Trying to Stop Abuses Against Palestinians
Jim Kavanagh
Trump’s Syrian See-Saw: From Pullout to Pillage
Susan Babbitt
Fidel, Three Years Later
Dean Baker
A Bold Plan to Strengthen and Improve Social Security is What America Needs
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Trump’s Crime Against Humanity
Victor Grossman
The Wall and General Pyrrhus
Yoko Liriano
De Facto Martial Law in the Philippines
Ana Paula Vargas – Vijay Prashad
Lula is Free: Can Socialism Be Restored?
Thomas Knapp
Explainer: No, House Democrats Aren’t Violating Trump’s Rights
Wim Laven
Serve With Honor, Honor Those Who Serve; or Support Trump?
Colin Todhunter
Agrarian Crisis and Malnutrition: GM Agriculture Is Not the Answer
Binoy Kampmark
Walls in the Head: “Ostalgia” and the Berlin Wall Three Decades Later
Akio Tanaka
Response to Pete Dolack Articles on WBAI and Pacifica
Nyla Ali Khan
Bigotry and Ideology in India and Kashmir: the Legacy of the Babri Masjid Mosque
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail