FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Iran, the U.S. and EIKO

Photo source futureatlas.com | CC BY 2.0

Now that U.S. President Donald Trump has violated the internationally-recognized JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), to the dismay of most of the world, and even most of the U.S.’s military experts, Iran can once again expect sanctions. This, of course, puts the U.S.’s European allies in an awkward position, since those that are signatories of the agreement plan to remain in it, since Iran is in complete compliance with the terms of the agreement.

One Iranian organization that is sure to feel the displaced wrath of the unstable U.S. president is the ‘Execution of Imam Khomeini’s Order’ (EIKO). This organization is controlled by the Ayatollah Khamenei, and that is sufficient for the U.S. to want to damage it.

But what is the EIKO? Is it a terrorist organization, like the U.S.’s Central American Agency (CIA), or Israel’s Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)? Let’s look at the purpose, as proclaimed by the Ayatollah:  “I’m concerned about solving problems of the deprived classes of the society. For instance, solve problems of 1000 villages completely. How good would be if 1000 points of the country are solved or 1000 schools are built in the country; prepare this organization for this purpose.”

The U.S. government, of course, is completely unconcerned about ‘solving problems of the deprived classes’ within the U.S., since at least 45 million U.S. citizens live below the government-established poverty line, which is a joke in and of itself; for a family of four, a total household income of below $25,100 is considered living in poverty. Food, housing, utilities, clothing, medical and other expenses for a family of four cannot be met on that income. But while the government continues to cut spending on social programs, hurting the already poor and forcing more people into poverty, it spends billions of dollars on weapons to kill people around the world. It is unlikely that 1,000 new schools will be built any time soon, especially since U.S. Education Secretary Besty DeVos recently announced that she has visited no underperforming schools during her tenure. Why solve a problem that you choose not to see?

But what is any of that?  The fact that EIKO seeks to help struggling people in Iran is of no importance to the U.S. government; all that matters is that it is under the control of the Ayatollah Khamenei.

A subsidiary of EIKO, the Barakat Foundation, lists this prominently on its website: “A blessed effort to uproot deprivation and to realize social and economic empowerment”. Again, a very controversial statement in the eyes of the U.S. government.

Such disdain for helping people in need is typical of the U.S. government, which, in 2017, stopped funding UNESCO, the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization. On its website, in answer to the question, ‘What is UNESCO’, we read this:  UNESCO “…seeks to build peace through international cooperation in Education, the Sciences and Culture.” And yet last year, the U.S., which provided 22% of funding to the organization, cut it all off. The U.S., obviously, has little or no interest in building peace.

With the U.S.’s shocking violation of the JCPOA, sanctions that impact the Iranian people are likely to be imposed once again, and the U.S. may target EIKO, which seeks to help the very people the sanctions will hit the hardest.

This writer reviewed some right-wing websites full of criticism of EIKO. These are some of the charges made against it:

One foundation within the EIKO umbrella is the Mostazafan Foundation. “A few months ago it published annual financial statements that declared its assets to be around $16 billion—likely a deliberate understatement.” The article offered no evidence that this amount was understated.

Let us remember that Trump claims to be a billionaire, but has never disclosed his finances, or his tax returns. So while his wealth is said to be overstated, his hiding of his financial records certainly seems to indicate that that is true, and provides more proof than the unfounded accusation against the Mostazafan Foundation.

“…it remains in the national security interest of the U.S. to prevent the worst of the worst actors (EIKO) in Iran from getting their hands on additional capital with which to finance their foreign aggression and domestic repression.” This phrase followed a list of the fields in which EIKO has investments, such as finance, oil and telecommunications. Nothing objectionable here. But let’s pay close attention to the idea of EIKO financing ‘foreign aggression and domestic repression’.

Iran has not invaded another nation since 1798. It has needed to defend itself and its people since that time, and has assisted allies in their struggles, as it is doing in Syria now. The terrorists in Syria that Iran is helping to fight are heavily financed by the U.S. Additionally, the U.S. is currently bombing seven countries. Are these not examples of ‘foreign aggression’?

And what about ‘domestic repression’ in the U.S.? Unarmed men, women and children of color are routinely gunned down by the racist U.S. police force with almost complete impunity. The U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. These seem to be examples of ‘domestic repression’ to this writer.

Another article references U.S. “…legislation honoring a Russian whistleblower….” That’s all well and good, but U.S. whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning are sentenced to long prison terms in solitary confinement. She was only released after being pardoned by President Barack Obama shortly before he left office. Edward Snowden, who also revealed U.S. government crimes, fled the country and remains in Russia on temporary asylum. Praising a Russian whistleblower while condemning those who expose U.S. crimes is the height of hypocrisy.

It remains to be seen if Trump will target EIKO; the effects of his decision to violate the JCPOA  are still reverberating around the world, and with his unsound decision-making process, whatever on earth that even is, it’s anyone’s guess what he’ll do next. It’s possible that EIKO will be targeted. But with England, France, Germany, the European Union, Russia and China, the other signatories to the JCPOA, vowing to continue to abide by it, as they should, the U.S. may be put in the uncomfortable position of needing to sanction some of its oldest and most trusted allies.

This is the new world order as envisioned by Trump. This is increasing global isolation of the U.S., the continuing downward spiral of the U.S.’s reputation, and a frightening march toward war.

One would hope that more sensible minds in Washington, D.C. would halt this headlong rush to disaster, but there don’t seem to be any there. The greatest hope now for peace is the combination of Iran, Russia and China, working together to counter the U.S.- Israeli threat. And with that, it is hoped that EIKO will be able to continue its all-important work.

More articles by:

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Pill Press).

September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savoir
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail