Trump & Johnson: What a Contrast, Image-wise!

Is there an age for everything? Yes and No. Instant look at British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s images give the impression as if he isn’t too bothered about his hair appearing to be ruffled and almost rushing to his eyes. What if he had glasses on? But that’s another issue. Look carefully, it is a much-practiced combing/setting hair exercise, to prevent his receding hair-line from being visible to people. Not that the quantity of hair on his head is a serious issue for his supporters and/or critics but it certainly appears to bear a lot of importance for him. In contrast, United States’ President Donald Trump’s hair-style seems so perfectly set, with hardly a hair out of place. Substantial attention has been paid to his hair-style also hiding his receding hair-line. Well, simply out of respect, this scribe has chosen not to use word- balding. Yes, when we talk of receding hair-line, it implies balding.

But then what is wrong with balding and why is new importance being given by most politicians across the world to setting their hair to hide receding hair-lines? They don’t want to look even partly bald before others. Of course, how can their right to be so hair-conscious questioned? They have their right to do what they want to with their hair. But one certainly ponder over this. It could be age-factor and to a degree, that of looking better. There is nothing wrong with this. Who doesn’t want to look younger and better than his/her years suggest?

However, with due respect to two political celebrities, there is yet another aspect about the impression conveyed by “image” of both. Of course, it is not the same. Jokes apart, the question of it not being same cannot and does not exist. Their styles, gaits, facial expressions, etc. of both convey distinctly different impressions. While Johnson almost continually carries a “jovial” expression, at least this is suggested by his media-images, that of Trump ever being jovial cannot be imagined. It is not that Trump never has a smile on his face. But even his ear-to-ear smiles seem suggestive of his doing a favor to those around him. They don’t seem as natural as were those of his predecessors, including Barack Obama and Bill Clinton. You’ve got it. There is a certain arrogance in air carried by Trump’s gait, with his head being almost in the skies. We know that it is not there but he seems to convey the impression that it is there.

In contrast, Johnson seems more focused on the ground ahead of him. Not that he is worried about slipping (politically, diplomatically and/or physically) the next moment or who knows he may be, but at least he is trying not to appear arrogant. This is interesting. More so because of the well-known phrase – British upper lip. Yes, all British don’t have it. But those in power and from the royal class have almost always had it. Johnson does not seem to have this trait. Trump does display the sensibility of a stiff upper lip, which cannot be linked with American nationality. Perhaps, it has more to do with his political ego.

With this being the era of communication boom, there is no denying that politicians and most celebrities need to give extra importance to their image. They have no choice as they are almost perpetually in the public eye. And this draws attention to another aspect of image-promotion “attitude” of both Trump and Johnson. Whether Trump has a giant-sized ego or not, there is no denying he is extra-conscious of being head of a superpower. And he probably has no regrets about this reflecting on his face, in his posture, overall in his personality and attitude. What can be said about Johnson projecting, at least trying to, a different image. He is apparently not oblivious of criticism showered on him in various British circles, including media. He is trying to take all this in his stride. He has no choice but let it appear so, even if it is through his hair appearing to be fairly ruffled. Though close observation suggests that this is not really the reason.

Seriously speaking, hair-style of males plays a greater part than of females in projecting their personality even though the former hardly have any compared to latter. In essence, politico-diplomatic reasons may be viewed as playing a major part in image-promotion drive of Trump and Johnson, including their hair-styles, facial expressions and whatsoever you may view as worth taking note of. Clean-shaved Trump and Johnson have limited choice about their dress-styles. It is their democratic right to pay the importance they desire to their respective hair-styles, facial expressions and their images. It may or may not be taken as a hair-splitting issue by research scholars!

More articles by:

Nilofar Suhrawardy is a senior journalist and writer with specialization in communication studies and nuclear diplomacy. Her latest book is Modi’s Victory, A Lesson for the Congress…? (2019). Others include:– Arab Spring, Not Just a Mirage! (2019), Image and Substance, Modi’s First Year in Office (2015) and Ayodhya Without the Communal Stamp, In the Name of Indian Secularism (2006).

February 24, 2020
Stephen Corry
New Deal for Nature: Paying the Emperor to Fence the Wind
M. K. Bhadrakumar
How India’s Modi is Playing on Trump’s Ego to His Advantage
Jennifer Matsui
Tycoon Battle-Bots Battle Bernie
Robert Fisk
There’s Little Chance for Change in Lebanon, Except for More Suffering
Rob Wallace
Connecting the Coronavirus to Agriculture
Bill Spence
Burning the Future: the Growing Anger of Young Australians
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Binoy Kampmark
The Priorities of General Motors: Ditching Holden
George Wuerthner
Trojan Horse Timber Sales on the Bitterroot
Rick Meis
Public Lands “Collaboration” is Lousy Management
David Swanson
Bloomberg Has Spent Enough to Give a Nickel to Every Person Whose Life He’s Ever Damaged
Peter Cohen
What Tomorrow May Bring: Politics of the People
Peter Harrison
Is It as Impossible to Build Jerusalem as It is to Escape Babylon?
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
Jefferson Morley
On JFK, Tulsi Gabbard Keeps Very Respectable Company
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up for Left Literature: In India, It Can Cost You Your Life
Gary Leupp
Bloomberg Versus Bernie: The Upcoming Battle?
Ron Jacobs
The Young Lords: Luchadores Para La Gente
Richard Klin
Loss Leaders
Gaither Stewart
Roma: How Romans Differ From Europeans
Kerron Ó Luain
The Soviet Century
Mike Garrity
We Can Fireproof Homes But Not Forests
Fred Baumgarten
Gaslighting Bernie and His Supporters
Joseph Essertier
Our First Amendment or Our Empire, But Not Both
Peter Linebaugh
A Story for the Anthropocene
Danny Sjursen
Where Have You Gone Smedley Butler?
Jill Richardson
A Broken Promise to Teachers and Nonprofit Workers
Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission for Julian Assange