FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

2019 the Best Year Ever? The Street’s the Place to Go

“In the long arc of human history, 2019 has been the best year ever,” declared an eminent opinion writer for the New York Times. His statistical proof was that “children were least likely to die, adults were least likely to be illiterate and people were least likely to suffer excruciating and disfiguring diseases,” plus more and more people had access to electricity, running water, went online and moved out of extreme poverty.

What about growing inequality? Disasters caused by climate change such as fires in Australia? Millions and millions of people forced to leave their homes? Violence in Afghanistan, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, Syria and the continuing threat of groups like ISIS, al-Qaeda, Boko Harem and al- Shabaab? Donald Trump’s presidency? The rise of autocratic rulers and the decline of democratic values? Brexit? Potential famine in Zimbabwe? Venezuela? Eastern Ukraine? Crimea? Civilian deaths from powerful guns including shootings in schools? Growing disillusion with traditional values and institutions? Racism, even on soccer pitches? Data surveillance and invasion of our private sphere? The situation of Muslims in China and India?

In Geneva, the failure of the United Nations and multilateralism to have a moral voice and to influence global peace and security? The lack of impact of the Human Rights Council and the Conference on Disarmament? Blockage at the World Trade Organization? The continuing financial crisis of the United Nations and the assault on any form of multilateralism by the Trump administration?

How does on judge the positives and negatives of the past year? The Times columnist missed an important point. In spite of all the negatives I mentioned, the most positive thing that took place in 2019 was the fact that people took to the streets to express their dissatisfaction with the status quo. Whether in France with the Gilets jaunes or in the streets of Chile, Iran or Hong Kong, civil society has responded to perceived injustices.

Street manifestations have increased. Throughout the world followers of Greta Thunberg, for example, have raised awareness of environmental degradation and the dire consequences of human inactivity to reverse climate change. Whether or not formally organized, protesters, often helped by social media, have been able to have a voice.

Where traditional political mechanisms have failed, in the words of the Weather Girls, “the street’s the place to go.”

Whatever the subject – environmental or social – people have gone to the streets to show the political leaders that the status quo is unacceptable. Whether or not the protesters are organized like the recent strike by union workers in France, or even if they have been aided or encouraged by exogenous forces, 2019 has seen street movements throughout the world.

Some have failed. Occupy Wall Street had little traction. The students’ Friday protests did not have an immediate effect on governments at the recent COP25 meeting in Madrid. The Friday protests in Algeria did not lead to a radical transformation of the traditional system. Nonetheless, there were partial victories. The Hong Kong protesters were able to get the extradition law retracted. French President Emmanuel Macron has already modified his radical retirement reform.

But the point is not who won or lost. The protests have come in many forms and their goals have changed over time. What is important to watch is how quickly people are ready to take to the streets and how willing they are to continue in the face of extreme repression and economic hardships.

Marching in the street remains a vital means of expression. With the help of new technology, and with little formal legitimacy, people like Greta are able to mobilize large movements. And the traditional political system will have to take notice. In democratic countries like Switzerland, street demonstrations were reflected at ballot box which allowed the Green Party to make substantial gains. In a different way, the general unrest in Bolivia led to the ouster of Evo Morales.

In spite of predictions of general passivity, civil society protest movements have had tremendous influence. So while it may be easier in the future to count how many U.S. senators will vote for impeachment, it will be as important if not more important to watch the growing groundswell of protest movements. They may not give statistical hope for the future nor confirm that 2019 was the best year ever. But they are certainly something to watch if not to participate in.

More articles by:

Daniel Warner is the author of An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations. (Lynne Rienner). He lives in Geneva.

Weekend Edition
July 03, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Peter Linebaugh
Police and the Wealth of Nations: Déjà Vu or Unfinished Business?
Rob Urie
Class, Race and Power
John Davis
A Requiem for George Floyd
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mutiny of the Bounties!
Richard D. Wolff
Revolutionary Possibilities: Could U.S. Capitalism Turn Nationalist?
Richard Falk
When Rogue States Sanction the International Criminal Court
Louis Proyect
Smearing Black Lives Matter…From the Left
Ralph Nader
Trump and Pence – Step Aside for Professional Pandemic Scientists and Managers
Ramzy Baroud
Tearing Down the Idols of Colonialism: Why Tunisia, Africa Must Demand French Apology
Philippe Marlière
Challenging the French Republic’s Color-Blindness
Richard C. Gross
Attack, Deny
Lee Camp
Connecting the Dates – US Media Used To Stop The ‘Threat’ of Peace
Steve Martinot
The Desire to Kill
David Yearsley
The War on Kitsch
Amy Eva Alberts Warren – Rev. William Alberts
Why are Certain Christians Democratic and Others Authoritarian?
Lawrence Davidson
Covid Madness
Brian Cloughley
Britain’s Disorder and Decline
Ellen Taylor
The US Military Has Its Knee on the Throat of the World
David Rosen
White Nationalists on the Attack
Jeff Cohen
Politicians of Color Should Not be Immune From Criticism
Joseph Natoli
Drawn Away from Reality in Plain View
Frank Joyce
Give Me Liberty,  Give You Death
Jonah Raskin
My Adventures in the Matriarchy
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Corruption of the Democratic Party: Talking to Ted Rall about his new book
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
Trump’s Record on Foreign Policy: Lost Wars, New Conflicts and Broken Promises
Paul Edwards
A Bridge Too Far
Arshad Khan
India and China Tussle on the Roof of the World
Jennifer Joan Thompson
How to Do Things With Theses: Chile’s National Police Force Sues the Feminist Artistic Collective, Las Tesis
Shawn Fremstad
Vacations for All!
Thomas Knapp
A Modest Proposal for Compromise on “Confederate” Military Bases
Vijay Prashad, Eduardo Viloria Daboín, Ana Maldonado, and Zoe PC
Venezuela’s Borderlands Have Been Assaulted by COVID-19
Thom Hartmann
COVID Masks: The Latest Faux Conservative Outrage
Jesse Jackson
Mandatory College Football Practices in Time of Pandemic are Nuts
Nicholas Vincenzo Barney
Consensus Politics on the Fringe: The Intellectual Dishonesty of the Intellectual Dark Web
Ted Rall
The Data is Clear: Progressives Should Boycott Biden
Joshua Tartakovsky
Sergei Khrushchev: An Eulogy from His Close Student
Theresa Church
In Reconsidering ‘Normalcy’ Genetically Engineered Trees Do Not Belong
Chelsea Carrick
Let’s Not Lose Momentum
Adam Rissien
Sorry Secretary Perdue, Our National Forests are Not Crops
Paul Gilk
A Few Theoretical Percentages
Thomas S. Harrington
“New Corona Cases”:  A Phrase That’s Tells us Very Little, if Anything,  About the Actual Levels of Danger We  Face
Claire Chadwick
I Got COVID-19 at Work. I Won’t be the Last
George Wuerthner
The Upper Green River Should be a National Park, Not a Feedlot
Julian Vigo
Profiteering in the Era of COVID-19
Ravi Mangla
Policing is Not a Public Good
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail