FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

2019 the Best Year Ever? The Street’s the Place to Go

“In the long arc of human history, 2019 has been the best year ever,” declared an eminent opinion writer for the New York Times. His statistical proof was that “children were least likely to die, adults were least likely to be illiterate and people were least likely to suffer excruciating and disfiguring diseases,” plus more and more people had access to electricity, running water, went online and moved out of extreme poverty.

What about growing inequality? Disasters caused by climate change such as fires in Australia? Millions and millions of people forced to leave their homes? Violence in Afghanistan, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, Syria and the continuing threat of groups like ISIS, al-Qaeda, Boko Harem and al- Shabaab? Donald Trump’s presidency? The rise of autocratic rulers and the decline of democratic values? Brexit? Potential famine in Zimbabwe? Venezuela? Eastern Ukraine? Crimea? Civilian deaths from powerful guns including shootings in schools? Growing disillusion with traditional values and institutions? Racism, even on soccer pitches? Data surveillance and invasion of our private sphere? The situation of Muslims in China and India?

In Geneva, the failure of the United Nations and multilateralism to have a moral voice and to influence global peace and security? The lack of impact of the Human Rights Council and the Conference on Disarmament? Blockage at the World Trade Organization? The continuing financial crisis of the United Nations and the assault on any form of multilateralism by the Trump administration?

How does on judge the positives and negatives of the past year? The Times columnist missed an important point. In spite of all the negatives I mentioned, the most positive thing that took place in 2019 was the fact that people took to the streets to express their dissatisfaction with the status quo. Whether in France with the Gilets jaunes or in the streets of Chile, Iran or Hong Kong, civil society has responded to perceived injustices.

Street manifestations have increased. Throughout the world followers of Greta Thunberg, for example, have raised awareness of environmental degradation and the dire consequences of human inactivity to reverse climate change. Whether or not formally organized, protesters, often helped by social media, have been able to have a voice.

Where traditional political mechanisms have failed, in the words of the Weather Girls, “the street’s the place to go.”

Whatever the subject – environmental or social – people have gone to the streets to show the political leaders that the status quo is unacceptable. Whether or not the protesters are organized like the recent strike by union workers in France, or even if they have been aided or encouraged by exogenous forces, 2019 has seen street movements throughout the world.

Some have failed. Occupy Wall Street had little traction. The students’ Friday protests did not have an immediate effect on governments at the recent COP25 meeting in Madrid. The Friday protests in Algeria did not lead to a radical transformation of the traditional system. Nonetheless, there were partial victories. The Hong Kong protesters were able to get the extradition law retracted. French President Emmanuel Macron has already modified his radical retirement reform.

But the point is not who won or lost. The protests have come in many forms and their goals have changed over time. What is important to watch is how quickly people are ready to take to the streets and how willing they are to continue in the face of extreme repression and economic hardships.

Marching in the street remains a vital means of expression. With the help of new technology, and with little formal legitimacy, people like Greta are able to mobilize large movements. And the traditional political system will have to take notice. In democratic countries like Switzerland, street demonstrations were reflected at ballot box which allowed the Green Party to make substantial gains. In a different way, the general unrest in Bolivia led to the ouster of Evo Morales.

In spite of predictions of general passivity, civil society protest movements have had tremendous influence. So while it may be easier in the future to count how many U.S. senators will vote for impeachment, it will be as important if not more important to watch the growing groundswell of protest movements. They may not give statistical hope for the future nor confirm that 2019 was the best year ever. But they are certainly something to watch if not to participate in.

More articles by:

Daniel Warner is the author of An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations. (Lynne Rienner). He lives in Geneva.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
Jefferson Morley
On JFK, Tulsi Gabbard Keeps Very Respectable Company
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up for Left Literature: In India, It Can Cost You Your Life
Gary Leupp
Bloomberg Versus Bernie: The Upcoming Battle?
Richard Klin
Loss Leaders
Gaither Stewart
Roma: How Romans Differ From Europeans
Kerron Ó Luain
The Soviet Century
Mike Garrity
We Can Fireproof Homes But Not Forests
Fred Baumgarten
Gaslighting Bernie and His Supporters
Joseph Essertier
Our First Amendment or Our Empire, But Not Both
Peter Linebaugh
A Story for the Anthropocene
Danny Sjursen
Where Have You Gone Smedley Butler?
Dave Lindorff
What’s a Social Democratic Political Program Really Mean?
Jill Richardson
A Broken Promise to Teachers and Nonprofit Workers
Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission for Julian Assange
Wade Sikorski
Oil or Food? Notes From a Farmer Who Doesn’t Think Pipelines are Worth It
Christopher Brauchli
The Politics of Vengeance
Hilary Moore – James Tracy
No Fascist USA! Lessons From a History of Anti-Klan Organizing
Linn Washington Jr.
Ridiculing MLK’s Historic Garden State ‘Firsts’
L. Michael Hager
Evaluating the Democratic Candidates: the Importance of Integrity
Jim Goodman
Bloomberg Won’t, as They Say, Play Well in Peoria, But Then Neither Should Trump
Olivia Alperstein
We Need to Treat Nuclear War Like the Emergency It Is
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Jesse Jackson
Kerner Report Set Standard for What a Serious Presidential Candidate Should Champion
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Home Sweet Home: District Campaign Financing
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Latest BLM Hoodwinkery: “Fuel Breaks” in the Great Basin
Wendell Griffen
Grace and Gullibility
Cesar Chelala
Brazil’s Bolsonaro Says No to Democracy
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail