Boston One Step Closer to a Luxury Real Estate Transfer Tax

Last week, the Boston City Council voted 10-3 in favor of a home rule petition to the Massachusetts legislature to levy a real estate transfer tax on high-end sales.

A few days later, on December 16th 2019, Boston Mayor Martin Walsh signed the petition in a signing ceremony in Chinatown with housing advocates and lead sponsors. It now heads to the state legislature with growing home rule petitions from other communities.

“This is a significant step forward,” said Walsh.  “We’re asking the legislature to fast track this proposal and get it to the governor’s desk.”

The proposed law, introduced by Boston City Councilors Kim Janey and Lydia Edwards, would levy a 2 percent real estate transfer tax on residential and commercial properties assessed over $2 million.  The tax would raise an estimated $169 million a year for affordable housing, largely allocated through the Neighborhood Housing Trust.  This would greatly surpass the city’s current budget for affordable housing.

“This is not a silver bullet,” said City Councilor Edwards. “It’s our job to come up with a set of tools to make Boston a livable city.  When we see multi-million dollar transactions happen every day, while people cannot afford their rent every day, we have to do more. This is a compromise bill of up to 2 percent tax on properties over 2 million. We’re asking for permission for Boston to be as bold as it can be.”

The City of Boston must be granted permission by the state legislature for this additional taxing authority.  The effort joins home rule petitions for real estate transfer taxes by Nantucket, Somerville, Brookline and Concord. Other Massachusetts communities that will likely submit home rule petitions include Cambridge, Watertown and Arlington.

A coalition of environmental and affordable housing advocates has formed at the state level to press for a statewide luxury real estate tax to fund affordable housing and climate change resiliency.  State legislation includes a home rule option for municipalities to levy a local transfer tax, like the Boston proposal.

The Walsh administration was late to endorse the transfer tax proposal, declaring its support only after a December 5th working group meeting and a substantial compromise.  The initial Janey-Edwards legislation called for a home rule framework that would have allowed for a transfer tax as high as 6 percent and also included a 25 percent surtax on the rapid flipping of properties.  This more progressive luxury transfer tax would have raised over $450 million a year for the city’s affordable housing initiatives.

The Greater Boston Real Estate Board actively lobbied against the tax, which would be paid by a 1 percent tax on seller and 1 percent tax on the buyer.

A luxury transfer tax was one of several policy recommendations from our Institute for Policy Studies report, Towering Excess: The Perils of the Luxury Real Estate Boom for Bostonians, released in September of 2018.  It mirrors existing luxury transfer tax laws in the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
Jefferson Morley
On JFK, Tulsi Gabbard Keeps Very Respectable Company
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up for Left Literature: In India, It Can Cost You Your Life
Gary Leupp
Bloomberg Versus Bernie: The Upcoming Battle?
Richard Klin
Loss Leaders
Gaither Stewart
Roma: How Romans Differ From Europeans
Kerron Ó Luain
The Soviet Century
Mike Garrity
We Can Fireproof Homes But Not Forests
Fred Baumgarten
Gaslighting Bernie and His Supporters
Joseph Essertier
Our First Amendment or Our Empire, But Not Both
Peter Linebaugh
A Story for the Anthropocene
Danny Sjursen
Where Have You Gone Smedley Butler?
Jill Richardson
A Broken Promise to Teachers and Nonprofit Workers
Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission for Julian Assange
Wade Sikorski
Oil or Food? Notes From a Farmer Who Doesn’t Think Pipelines are Worth It
Christopher Brauchli
The Politics of Vengeance
Hilary Moore – James Tracy
No Fascist USA! Lessons From a History of Anti-Klan Organizing
Linn Washington Jr.
Ridiculing MLK’s Historic Garden State ‘Firsts’
L. Michael Hager
Evaluating the Democratic Candidates: the Importance of Integrity
Jim Goodman
Bloomberg Won’t, as They Say, Play Well in Peoria, But Then Neither Should Trump
Olivia Alperstein
We Need to Treat Nuclear War Like the Emergency It Is
Jesse Jackson
Kerner Report Set Standard for What a Serious Presidential Candidate Should Champion
Home Sweet Home: District Campaign Financing
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Latest BLM Hoodwinkery: “Fuel Breaks” in the Great Basin
Wendell Griffen
Grace and Gullibility
Cesar Chelala
Brazil’s Bolsonaro Says No to Democracy
Nicky Reid
Hillary, Donald & Bernie: Three Who Would Make a Catastrophe
David Yearsley
Dresden 75